• ladybugs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    None. Someday, some company will build and sell a tool that actually does that, and it will be hella privacy invasive. Actually, it’ll probably just be another invasive feature added to the Ray Ban perv glasses.

    • ladybugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      another thing: I think most people answering here aren’t thinking about how it would feel to have the statistic they’re choosing over their own heads.

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Times they told the truth.

    If it’s objective truth, sweet! Motherload I can asking anyone the a question to the secrets of the universe and know whether they’re wild guess was true!

    If it’s subjective truth, also useful, but you know just lies or ignorance detector

  • Lumisal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Percentage on how likely someone is to be caught if they were murdered along with the coordinates of that location 48 hours from current time.

    Just for curiosity.

    Or maybe what everyone else said about farts or something

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You could cheese this by picking a statistic for something like “likelihood to agree if asked for a favor”. I’m not going to stress over the wording on how to make it most useful, but something like that could be interesting.

    Or something like “amount of undiagnosed cancers” if you want to save people.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Ugh I’m horrible with names, maybe a picture of their face also.

      Though on a more serious note, a picture of the last hairstyle you saw them with could be helpful.

  • TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I was going to hold back on this one, but then i read the comments section:

    Willingness to give head on a scale of 1-100. the Stat could have different color codes though, so I could “at a glance” some further info. (like bright red means they probably have an STI, regardless of the number, or lavender over a woman means she prefers “tacos” if you catch my meaning, dark green could mean they are down with little convincing, you know, “that sort of thing.”)

    I’m expecting to confirm my suspicions that the numbers are not as high as the spicy sites would have you believe.