Some Tesla engineers secretly started designing a Cybertruck alternative because they ‘hated’ it::“They were like, ‘You can’t be serious.’ They didn’t want to have anything to do with it,” Franz von Holzhausen said, according to Walter Isaacson.

    • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Good luck getting a base model F150 at a decent price. I tried earlier this year and only 3 dealers East of the Mississippi had the base model and they all wanted $30,000 OVER MSRP. Ford can lick my butt for not making enough base models and trying to push their XLT and platinums starting at $75k. I need a truck to work in not have it open and close the lift gate for me.

      At this point I’ll take a shit looking truck at a decent price over whatever the duck Ford and their dealers thought was a good idea with producing so little of the base model, not to mention base model with extended range batteries were ONLY available to fleet purchasers.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        You are actually allowed to buy directly from the manufacturer. Contact the Ford plant. They’ll sell it to you at MSRP

      • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s almost like lithium supply chains are absolutely fucked, and EVs would get zero traction without government subsidies.

        Feels good though. Saving the world. (/S)

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          We actually just discovered the largest deposit of lithium on earth in Nevada, so those should get unfucked in the next couple years.

          Kansas has declared all their children available for the mines.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      The “micron precision” memo that leaked tells me they’re nowhere close to mass production. At my old job, tolerances were pretty much set when we finished a design for a large chemical unit operation – which was typically built within two years. I would expect mass production of something like a car to not to take too much longer.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I see what you did there, stealing thunder with the Lightning.

      And yes, Ford’s approach is smart, cheaper, and more utilitarian. Besides, it doesn’t stand out like a smashed thumb in a splint.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Rivian also has some decent designs. I know that Ford has a stake in the company, but it’s only holding 12%, so I don’t know that they have much say in what goes on over there.

      • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I could’ve sworn Ford sold out in April. Also I love the idea of a Rivian, looks so good, but one of my customers has had one on order for so long it might as well be the cybertruck to him at this point.

  • EpsilonVonVehron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    2 years ago

    Any day now, the cyber truck will come whizzing down the hyperloop with its sub 10 micron build tolerance and tornado proof glass, fully autonomously driving of course. Any day now.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    There’s no way in hell this shit doesn’t completely flop, right? Like, who in their right mind would buy this garbage aside from techbros riding Elon’s pole?

    • Cornpop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There’s a ton of goobers that want it, but very few are actually going to be able to afford it. It’s going to be 80k plus

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      If it weren’t for Musk standing to make a profit from it and Tesla’s history of questionable design decisions and quality issues, I’d potentially be interested in one. I like how it looks (although my aesthetic choices are certainly not everyone’s cup of tea,) and the specs are pretty impressive if they manage to deliver on them.

      There’s a lot of hunger out there for more EV trucks, musk fanboys will gobble up anything he is involved in, and lots of people make questionable vehicle purchases, I think it will sadly sell just fine.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      There are plenty of people not in their right minds who have the money (or access to financing) and questionable taste to go buy the thing as soon as it’s available.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 years ago

    The OG cybertruck reminds me of Lara Croft in the OG Tomb Raider.

    If you know you know, looks like a shitty prototype.

  • angrystego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    So both the engineers and everyone in the comments is just saying they hate/like the look of it? That’s the last important part. As I understand it, the Cybertruck is never going to be allowed to the roads in Europe because of how unsafe it is. That’s what people should be interested in. Looks can be pleasing to some and ugly to others and that’s ok.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I wonder how much the other car’s crumple zone affects the performance of your own. I wouldn’t be surprised if one car not having one would degrade the performance of the one that does.

          In which case, these cars actually become a public safety risk.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        the bodies of children it’s software won’t detect will have plenty of crumple zones, don’t see what’s the issue

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        the thing is a giant slab of angled metal, when it crashes into things my guess is the hood will slide backwards and “dissect” entire people.

        • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s a threat with most vehicles and is easily engineered for. Aside from visibility problems, we can’t know what real safety issues it might have until we get crash test data.

    • WhipTheLlama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Why are people so convinced that the Cybertruck won’t be safe? Of all the bad things we can say about Tesla, it’s a fact that they’re quite safe vehicles. I see no reason why the company would suddenly build a vehicle that is so unsafe it cannot be sold in Europe. Some comments in this thread say it doesn’t have any crumple zones. How strong do you think 3mm stainless steel is? The strength of every vehicle comes from its frame, not from its body panels. Same thing with the Cybertruck.

      • Trashboat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Safety isn’t just about the driver though, you also have to think about what happens when they hit pedestrians or other cars. I gotta say, there’s a lot of vehicles I’d much rather be hit by than this if I had a choice

        • WhipTheLlama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          There are also pedestrian safety laws. I’m not convinced that the Cybertruck is less safe than any other similar-sized pickup truck. If anything, the nose is a bit lower, so it’d let a pedestrian fall on the hood more than if they were hit by another truck.

          Either way, the stainless steel isn’t going to be a factor, and the pickup market is flooded with vehicles that are less safe for pedestrians than lower cars.

  • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Y’know, I wanted one until I learned anything about Tesla as a company or about Elon, and then I decided it’s vaporware and will probably never be delivered for reasons that are stupid. Looking from the outside but with experience shipping big software releases, this smells a lot like what you get when you think of QC not as an engineering discipline, but as a cost to be minimized.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    Drive one from California to Texas and see where the body panels pop off.

  • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Am I the only person besides Elon who likes the cybertruck? I hate agreeing with that idiot on anything, but I think the cybertruck looks cool.

    • Klystron@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s intentionally designed to look polarizing. You’re not gonna find a lot of people sitting on the fence on this one and since it looks so different from every other car on the market there’s gonna be a lot of people who aren’t into the change. But yeah I hate it.

    • soren446@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The concept version scratched an itch I’ve had about seeing cyberpunk influence in modern car design really well. The more recent images remind me that it’s indeed a soulless corpo who would create a cyberpunk hell scape in a heartbeat if it could.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s this. I want a Tron themed EV and I want it to not look stupid driving around suburbia.

        And I’m afraid that those two things are mutually exclusive. Part of the cyberpunk aesthetic is the lack of soccer moms and hotdog stands.

    • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      It looks like a cheap, “futuristic” car that would be in a vintage sci-fi movie.

      I mean, there is nothing else on the road that looks like it for better or worse

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I like it, but honestly, the bigger reason I want it is the supposed 14k+ tow capacity.

      If it doesn’t actually achieve that, which I’m definitely dubious it will, it’s a nonstarter for me.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’d expect that to arrive at the same time as the unbreakable glass and the full self driving.

    • elfahbeht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think it’s mostly that the roof comes to a point. If it had a flat roof it’d look a lot better.

    • ultranaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I love it too. It’s completely ridiculous and ugly in a way that appeals to me.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    There’s a lot to hate. It’s insanely ugly. It’s like a PT Cruiser and a Nissan Cube mated and all the worst car genes went right into the CybeR TruCk.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Keep those designs in your back pocket. Teslas gonna need something to replace the Cybertruck with after it flops and investors finally oust Elon.

    • sugartits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The sales of the Model Y are more than making up for any dud Tesla puts out right now.

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    i’m really excited for this isaacson bio; i loved his steve jobs one, but i read that in high school, bright eyed and wanting to go into tech. lol.

  • ensignrolaren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Read this as ‘cyberduck’ at first and I was like, what’s wrong with my favorite FTP client? Why do they hate it?