• Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 years ago

          Hydro, wind, solar, and wave/tide energy capture are not.

          The crazy part is photovoltaics are the only power source that doesn’t spin something to make electricity. Truly an outlier.

          • gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            There’s one more outlier though which is Electrochemical cell, like galvanic element or voltaic pile

            It was used around 1800 as a major electricity source, but I guess it quickly became uneconomical in 1866 or sth when the dynamo was invented.

            Edit: wait yes, it actually says this in the second paragraph of the linked article:

            The entire 19th-century electrical industry was powered by batteries related to Volta’s (e.g. the Daniell cell and Grove cell) until the advent of the dynamo (the electrical generator) in the 1870s.

          • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Which requires them to output DC rather than AC, so they require inverters to change it to AC. It’s handier for battery storage though.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I swear Nuclear Reactors were designed by a chemist with a grudge against a physicist and engineer.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Run low on water, stop reaction. Fission products keep getting hot even though reaction stopped. Not enough water to cool them off. Shit.

    • Kaelygon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      thankfully modern ones like molten salt reactors have passive safety, where they stop the reaction if overheating occurs.
      edit: My mistake, there’s no active commercial molten salt reactors.
      But nuclear power is very safe nowadays because of the multiple fail-safes, which some can still be passive like emergency cooling.
      I much rather get electricity from magic rocks than destroying rain forest in developing countries drilling oil, gas or mining coal.
      The biggest risk in nuclear is environmental disasters like in Fukushima’s case, which is the last significant nuclear incident in past 13 years

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You can’t stop decay heat. It’s just molton salt reactors can operate at much higher temperatures and if it loses active cooling passive cooling with just air and infrared radiation while the salt passively circulates could be enough.

      • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Isn’t molten salt just energy storage? Heat up salt when you have excess of energy, take heat out when you need it. The worst disaster there is just the container melting.

        • Agent641@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          No, there are molten salt thermal batteries, but they aren’t the same as molten salt nuclear reactor. In a nuclear reactor the fissile material is dissolved in the salt for some reason, and the molten salt acts as a moderator or something. Apparently its safe because if the reactor power fails, the salt ‘freezes’ which prevents fission from occurring. Seems like complex extra steps to me but what do I know.

          • JATth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            MSRs have negative temperature reactivity coefficient and outlet temps around 700C at atm pressure. PWR is at measly 300C and 150 Bar.

            If all control is lost, the salt expands as it heats up pushing the expanded volume out from the reactor core. The fission stops once the fuel is leaves the core region where the moderator is. Reverse is also true: you pull heat off from the loop, so the fuel-salt becomes denser, increasing reactivity. MSRs can naturally “follow” the load, if done right.

      • Synapse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ah yes, the passive safety of the molten salt spontaneously catching on fire when in contact with air and can’t be put out with water.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Turn water back on suddenly and realize what happens when water touches an object many times warmer than it’s boiling point.

  • Skepticpunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Same applies to geothermal.

    lava is really hot

    use lava to boil water

    use steam to turn a generator

    free electricity!