• HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    So, I looked at age verification - it was made clear photos were on device only and never transmitted.

    If this turns out to be false, then the legal fallout would be apocalyptic.

    (Edit: or not, see the comment by ambitiousprocess below)

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    10 days ago

    The fact that these photos and PII (personally identifiable information) were not destroyed after the verification process was certified is absolutely atrocious OpSec. I don’t even care which of the two companies is ultimately responsible, because they are both responsible.

    1. Zendesk for their bad OpSec
    2. Discord for both outsourcing this AND not having contractual requirements to properly secure and destroy PII when it was no longer required.

    I work in IT, and treat PII like it’s dangerously radioactive, because in the digital world, it really is.

    • Tom Arrr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      “Apparently” only those who were challenging the verification results and uploaded awaiting reverification are affected.

      Not that that isn’t bad enough

    • Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Right. It blows me away the required training we have to do for physical files more secured than Fort Knox! Tech world? Eh just throw it in the recycle bin

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 days ago

    Politicians: That’s the point.

    Joking aside, now that I think about it, what difference does does it make if companies are stealing infos and spying on you with government mandated age verification checks, and hackers stealing your government mandated age verification info? This just reinforces my view that governments (and companies) are nothing but glorified gangsters.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      A hacker stealing your id can do way more malicious stuff like more expertly crafted phishing and identity fraud just to name two.

      No one involved in this from the government to the companies is innocent in this chain though in my opinion. A breach is always bound to happen.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        To me giving a company or government permission to create the databases allowed for mass facial recognition is the same thing as giving the facial recognition data to criminals. It will be leaked/hacked/sold, etc. It is only a matter of time.

        How many Social security numbers in the U.S. have been leaked/hacked/sold/illegally transferred? ~340 million.

        Facial recognition will be a near useless tool for security in 10 years, and 100% for population monitoring at the rate we are going.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Option 3: companies that you pay to provide authentication service. Regulated so that they clearly tell you if they are subsidizing service outside of your payments.

      We nearly already do this with certificate services and they would probably be in a good position to offer an id service.

  • aliser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 days ago

    so instead of creating some kind of authorization system that would not require sending your private information to everyone the govt did nothing and instead put that responsibility on EVERY company. begs the question why rushing so much?

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 days ago

    To the surprise of no one here. This is the first thing I think of when a system wants me to upload an ID.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’ve criticized the sort of personal information that is allowed to be managed by banking entities in the cases of Accidental Americans, where people who have nothing to do with America except that they were born in the US have their data handled by private entities to be passed onto governments they’ve never been in. Public entities that should handle and be responsible for it in their actual home countries want to wash their hands off from them and there’s too much money against too small of a minority for anyone to care about their rights. It doesn’t matter how banks have consistently proven that they or their staff can act criminally, either.

    At least here, it affects a lot more people so it will likely bring in the change and reform it needs, even if the sensitivity of this data is significantly less.

    Gonna have to say, this guy is definitely gonna be screwed by this:

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Just the UK, as far as I’m able to find. Some US users have to verify by clicking the box, but I do not believe they’ve been en-masse required to upload ID or use the UK’s facial recognition nonsense.

        From the discord age verification FAQ:

        The age verification features described in this article are fully available only to users in the United Kingdom and apply to all new and existing UK accounts.

        • Kirp123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          So I guess it was only UK ones. For some reason I thought they were asking pictures in the US too.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 days ago

            You might be confusing it with how several states have attempted to implement identity verification for access to porn sites (which has so far avoided a similar scandal to this one by virtue of rampant, contemptuous noncompliance on the part of the porn sites)

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Besides some countries, people that had their account flagged as possible underage also need to verify themselves.

      I know a French guy that joked about being 12 in a chat, got reported by a troll that got his account locked, and had to send his ID to unlock it.

  • Billegh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 days ago

    That’s why I used a picture of my anus for my age verification photo. The wrinkles are what sold it, I think.