• HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      27 days ago

      *so that the government can say kids won’t watch porn.

      Rule 1 of computers that everyone who has taught an ICT class learns - if little Timmy wants titties, he finds a way.

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    Let this be a reminder to never turn away from piracy. It needs to constantly be in the background and if any company gets like they always do, then it comes back out. But if we let the knowledge fade away then it’s impossible to rebuild it.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    Or you know you could punish parents for not parenting. Like if kids are watching porn and caught and if it’s actually against some law then go after the parents.

    It’s not hard to teach parents how to implement a filtering DNS. But no, countries think they need to be the nanny.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      “Protecting children” is just the pretext under which governments can sell increased surveillance. The fact that there are more effective ways they could act to protect children, yet governments everywhere continue to push for ID checks and monitoring online activity, shows that the aim isn’t what they say it is.

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        27 days ago

        Protect from what? I mean seriously. Most of us (guys at least) probably saw porn way before we were old enough and most of us probably didn’t end up as rapists or pedophiles. It’s not a good thing by any means, but it really feels like we’re trying harder to keep sexual material from entering their brains than we are trying to keep them fed, clothed, educated, housed, healthy, loved, and physically safe. Of all the things I mentioned the last seven have a monumentally greater affect on their success and well-being as an adult.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      27 days ago

      That’s just the pretext they give to justify it. The real reason is surveillance. Now they have a way to confidently tie your accounts to your individual identity. And most of these solutions use third parties which will then sell that data as well, so now anyone can tie your account to you without you ever knowing.

      Even if the government is barred from surveilling citizens in these ways, third parties aren’t, and the government can just buy that information, no warrant needed anymore.

      And these laws never stop at porn, it’s drugs, LGBTQ information, etc. and they can always easily add additional things later with little fanfare.

      • Epzillon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        27 days ago

        This is it. Theyve been going after encrypted messaging apps for a long time, ig they realized theyre not getting anywhere and figured to just hit it head on.

        The internet has always circumvented this kind of shit, just look at TPB. The ones who are getting really beaten up by this is the older generations and the ones lacking technical know-how.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 days ago

          Yep. “The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.”

          LOL, wrong on that last point! Gen X and Millennials are generally hot shit on tech. It’s the young folks who don’t have a clue if something doesn’t “just work”. Present company excluded of course. :)

      • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        I feel like I’m standing between two really stupid positions here.

        On the one hand, just let parents teach their kids is basically a state’s rights argument. A lot of parents won’t teach their kids, so… do we care? Does this matter? We should probably mount a stronger effort then.

        On the other hand, we don’t need the government to get involved to stop 9 year olds from seeing titties—we just don’t! Websites the world over have implemented 2-factor-authentication more or less by themselves (and probably because they want to spy on you). And, no one says the word r----- anymore because if you ever do, a bunch of anti-bullying PSAs will be really annoying about it in your replies.

        Not every social problem needs to be solved by swinging around Thor’s hammer. We do have other means.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          is basically a state’s rights argument

          No, it’s a privacy and individual rights argument. I don’t want local governments enforcing it any more than I want national arguments enforcing it.

          Kids seeing stuff they shouldn’t isn’t itself a problem, but it can lead to problems. For example, kids learning to make bombs itself isn’t an issue, kids making bombs to hurt others is the issue. Hold parents legally accountable for the latter, not the former.

          The furthest I’d be willing to go on this is requiring a payment method (which itself requires sufficient age) to be entered before accessing anything “adult oriented,” and even then I’m not completely sold. But this way the burden of verifying age is restricted to things consumers already need to trust, and parents would need to give or allow their kid access to a payment method.

          • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            26 days ago

            I think you misunderstand. I’m not saying I’m in favor of this law.

            By state’s rights, I’m referring to the way republicans pretend they want the freedom of choice where they are actually just looking for excuses to keep doing what they’re doing. In this way, letting parents choose is functionally identical: parents won’t choose, so it is equivalent to doing nothing.

            There has to be a cultural shift for anything to change.

            Kids seeing stuff they shouldn’t isn’t itself a problem,

            If I’m being perfectly honest, I do not give a shit if 9-year-olds can see titties. Like, my other argument against this government overreach is that I don’t know what problem it’s supposedly solving that can’t just be solved with better sex-ed.

  • ckmnstr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    26 days ago

    Don’t threaten, just do it. Enshittification must end.

    The only reason we have mainstream paid video streaming now is because early Netflix was genuinely better than dodgy, pop-up riddled mirrors on movie4k.to. The convenience was well worth 8 bucks a month. Same for Spotify.

    Fast forward 10 years and Spotify wants me to pay 15 €, scan my face and listen to forced podcast ads AND pay extra for paywalled audiobooks that used to be free? Meet my good old friend youtube-downloader, then.

  • Allemaniac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    what are “spotify fans”? Spotify paid 150k $ for Trump’s inauguration party, f them. They do not deserve my money

    • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      26 days ago

      I left Spotify for many reasons including this. They’ve only proven that they do not care about artists at all. I remember before I left, many of the tracks that came up “based on my playlist” were just random AI generated crap.

  • ‮redirtSdeR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    27 days ago

    what’s even the point of age gating “explicit” music?

    “oh no! “Speak To Me” by Pink Floyd has the fuck word in it! can’t let my kids hear it!”

    • Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      We live in a rural part of Canada that has been left behind by modern times. Mostly by the choice of the residents. I grew up during satanic panic. It was crazy here. My wife and I let our kids listen to anything they want. They always have. They’re 10 and 12.

      Their friends often comment about swear words and “sex, drugs and rock and roll” themes of the music they listen too. As an old man I get to regale them with stories of how crazy the Christians were over heavy metal and punk rock when I was a kid, including their grandma.

      Now I yell “you’re gonna go to hell!” As a joke to them every time their friends bring it up and I am around.

  • Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    27 days ago

    I mean, the Spotify CEO invests in AI weaponry being used to murder kids in Gaza so the morally correct thing to do would be to leave Spotify over that.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    26 days ago

    The streaming services are run by shithead C-suites who think last quarter is the way it’s always been. They forget the only reason most of us use their services is someone more visionary than them made it more convenient than piracy half a generation ago. Let’s remind them there’s an alternative.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    A VPN is a must if you wanna go down this route

    Soulseek (and I recommend the Nicotine+ client over the official one) is a fantastic source for all music in all formats, and particularly obscure off-label shit you won’t get anywhere else. You’ll even have some success finding audiobooks there, although this is very hit-and-miss. I wish audiobook pirates would use it more heavily. It’s P2P, like Napster used to be. You’ll have to share something or you’ll get auto-ignored by most users.

    RuTracker is a great non-private/non-ratio-monitoring torrent site for music (does require a free account though). I’ve never had a single torrent from there that wasn’t seemingly seeded by a Godzilla’s dick. Obviously it’s in Russian, but there’s really no difficulty navigating around. The only thing you might struggle with is signing up for an account, but just have your favourite translation tool open in another tab 👍

    If you don’t mind slow download speeds (from the likes of RapidGator), I enjoy Exystence. It’s a blog that shares link to the latest albums and offers both lossy and lossless versions. Nice RSS subscription to have.

    If you do find yourself using RapidGator a lot, don’t waste money buying a sub directly from them, it’s insanely pricey. Instead, get a reseller like Real Debrid, which costs like 10% as much and also covers you for about two-dozen other file hosters. I highly recommend putting as much distance between your credit card and the company as possible, just for safety reasons. Using PaySafeCard is fine, as Real Debrid will never see your details in that case. I don’t have any specific reason to be weary of them, I just don’t trust random/small/hitherto unheard of companies as a rule.

    • Drasglaf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’ve been using RuTracker for years and it usually has all the music I need. And it has more than music, great site.

    • lustrum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      I often see here and reddit people justifying piracy with various reason.

      I do it because I can, because i’m a tight cunt and I like free stuff.

    • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      27 days ago

      My favorite part is when the AI DJ plays some dumb song it’s previously served up repeatedly, and then tells me how much I like it because I listen to it so often. I’d never choose to listen to it on my own, and the only reason I hear it is because Spotify keeps cramming it down my throat.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    You’re way better off with your own music collection. That is what I have. I use Tauon music box it handles large playlists well.

  • caudatecoder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    25 days ago

    as an independent artist I just wanna add: the best thing you can do to support artists and bands is to buy directly / on bandcamp. spotify pays shit to artists, you need millions of listeners to get any meaningful amount of cash

    of course that isn’t a sustainable option if you listen to a lot of different music. so piracy is an option that I wouldn’t mind. hell, if you like my stuff and just write to me I’ll send you mp3s for free

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      This exactly. Pirating is still preventing the artists from getting paid for their work. Choose to buy albums from companies like Bandcamp over just simply stealing their work.