• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    “United” States stands divided. It just gets worse…and at an incredible speed. It’s always quicker and easier to demolish as opposed to building. Every one wants the easy money and the quick buck without a balanced expenditure of energy.

  • SirFasy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    All hail The New California Republic. But in all seriousness, it wouldn’t surprise me if the United States has a balkanization event happen in the near future.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The US does not need balkanization.

      We have a single region that has been rebellious and trying to corrupt and destroy the rest of the union since the founding, because they cannot see any governmental or religious structure as legitimate unless it is founded on the principles of racism. This is their own words.

      Lincoln was wrong to readmit the south, we should have let Sherman finish then build a wall around them, while letting any slaves who wanted to escape do so.

      Either that or we need to restart reconstruction today with absolute brutality.

      Before they committed treason against the US alone, this time they allied with Russia to bring us down.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        We have a single region that has been rebellious and trying to corrupt and destroy the rest of the union since the founding

        Isn’t a ton of the current Trump administration rot coming from Silicon Valley?

        Isn’t Silicon Valley in California?

        Lincoln was wrong to readmit the south

        The South was under the Reconstruction plan, complete with Marshall Law and Freedman’s Bureaus and all sorts of additional federal oversight, untilThe Compromise of 1877 gave Rutherford B. Hayes the presidency at the cost of his soul.

        Lincoln didn’t simply readmit the South. He readmitted 9 million enslaved Americans as proper first class citizens. And the initial wave of democratization gave birth to a brief but generally optimistic egalitarian glimpse of a potential future.

        Lincoln’s big mistake was not putting Smedly Butler into his VP seat. Letting the country revert to Andrew Johnson was the big blunder. One that Grant had to spend two terms mopping up.

        But that’s all distant history. The modern fascist presidency is born out of Manhattan Island. The modern Texas/Florida/Ohio Axis of Evil is a product of Yale Business School. Stanford Alumni are fucking us up far more today than some Daughters of the Confederacy could have dreamed.

        This isn’t a North/South problem. It’s a turf war between extractive industry and the professional class.

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, because if there’s two things we know silicon valley loves it’s the core issues of the Trump administrafion:

          1. Immigration restrictions

          2. Tariffs

          He was voted in purely about the south, who are not only fascists to the core (if what they consider to be Christo-fascists).

          The thing is: their religion, the southern Baptist church, was founded because they wanted a religion whose core dogma was that slavery was a commandment from God. Hence their basing the Sbc around the curse of Ham justifying slavery. The nazis themselves based the Nuremberg Laws off Jim crow, only without the 1 drop rule.

          This is 100% the south, the restriction of women’s rights, the anti-lgbt, racism, isolation ism.

          They’ve been sold that Russia is their best ally because it is the last True (read: white) Christian Nation fighting against the atheist and Muslim hordes who have infested Europe.

          Silicon valley doesn’t want any of this bullshit, they just want less regulation. This has been a nightmare for them, Europe is starting their own competitors and regulating the cloud providers.

          Silicon valley is smart, this whole thing has the backwards inbred balls-over-brains energy of the south.

          Show me one Manhattan anyone who thinks those tariffs are a good idea.

          Super popular in the south though, finally those rich northerners will have to pay them to do the work, instead of buying stuff from the dirty Mexicans.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            there’s two things we know silicon valley loves it’s the core issues of the Trump administrafion:

            Immigration restrictions
            
            Tariffs
            

            Go pick up a copy of The Network State

      • samuelazers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Reminds me of east and west germany, even still today, one side is poorer than the other, which fostered new radicalism.

        And also where i live, Quebec, poorer rural regions control the elections.

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Exactly, the difference is in east Germany after the war they mostly dealt with the nazis.

          In the south they gave them a timeout for 10 years then let them take power again.

          • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Lol no they didn’t deal with the nazis in East Germany. They were pretty quickly persecuted if they came out, but as long as they stayed quiet and clamied they wanted socialism, nothing happened to them.

            And then after the fall of the east block, all of the nazis in eastern Germany no longer had to be quiet and there were also many nazis from the west who helped spread it even further while there was a power vacuum and nothing was done against it.

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    How would a state secede from the US? Like, what’s the actual process?

    • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The state government would put forwards a local movement to secede from the US, and if it actually passed the federal government would butt in and go “you can’t secede, that’s completely illegal and unconstitutional” (it is), at which point the state would either go “oh well” and stand down or say “go suck eggs” and continue trying to secede, which the federal government would treat as rebellion or insurrection.

      • j0ester@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Even if the federal government says “okay”. They may actually turn around and pretend it never happened… or they can start a war with them.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      You need to amend the constitution which requires 38 states to agree to it that considering how many right wing states hate California doesn’t sound impossible

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      There is no process. States cannot just up and say “see ya” on their own, we fought a war over that.

      If the people felt that it would be OK for a state to leave, the proper thing to do would be to pass an amendment stating a process, and then the state would do it. There would be a lot of details to hammer out: does the State get to keep Federal property (like military bases)? Does it inherit a share of the deficit? What happens to deferred US taxes on things like 401k accounts?

      IMHO it would take so long to hammer that stuff out that it’s basically impossible.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        “But it’s not legal!”

        Have you learned nothing the past three months? Laws are what we make of them.

        A state seceding is a simple process:

        1. The state passes an act to allow it.

        2. The sitting president endorses the idea and agrees to let them go peacefully.

        That’s it. The United States Constitution itself was illegally written, an exercise in simple willful power. State secession works the same way.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Legally, a state can’t secede really, but the other states could agree to let it go. It would require a Constitutional Convention, which would require 2/3 of states to agree to let it go.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      There is a historical example, but given the outcome, I don’t think it would be a good idea to follow that blueprint.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      That’s what the Civil War was about, there is no legal way to exit were one nation period end of story millions of dead soldiers proved it.

      If a state tried to leave they would have to prove they could no matter the laws. It would be war. No ifs ands or buts. That means having a military that could take out the US military. Currently the top Airforce in the world is the US Airforce, the second largest Airforce is the US Navy, then it’s Russia, then it’s the US Army. Unless you can somehow convince the military to side with you when you leave, it’s not going to happen. I would imagine if you tried to claim it legally the best you could hope for is Federal agents walking in the second said state gov claims independence, and idk arresting the heads of state for treason, and telling said state to elect a new gov.

      • CircaV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        But what is the US military going to do? go to a state that wants to secede and just kill everyone in it??

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s really not legally possible, meaning your either having a revolution, a civil war, or the USA has no ability to stop you as it’s effectively over.

      Unless CA has military bases that would fully side with them, as in all the ones in CA and they would need other states, THEN a war could be possible, but that is very unlikely, currently there’s no military that could beat the US military, so it’s not even worth going over unless the US dissolves.

      • BussyCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        The civil war only happens if the U.S. attacks after a secession, but the state that single most funds the U.S. military is California, if you include Washington and Oregon in the secession you now end up with 19ish% of the countries budget and a sizable percentage of the military bases. With the American civil war there was somewhat defined lines of north vs south but this would be fights inside their own states.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s actually not far off from how things shook out economically in the Civil War. The North had roughly 5x the manpower, firepower, and money of the South. The South was never going to “win” the Civil War, due to that disadvantage. For them, “winning” would have been making the war costly enough to the North that the North gave up.

        • seejur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          And the sentiment of half the East Coast (the one that matters) would be sympathetic to the secessionists

  • samuelazers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    As i read this, i am remembered of Newsom meeting Trump, after he refused to help with Californian wildfires.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Unfortunately this runs into constitutional problems. While the spineless subhuman creatures in congress and the supreme court seem to have no problem with Trump and his administration ignoring the constitution I fully expect them to come down hard on any state that does so (at least in cases that go against Trump and his policies).

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      They could implement this by just not charging the duties at the ports in California and see who blinks first.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          Federal and local government are likely both involved. With the doge cuts, who knows how many boots they actually have on the ground for this these days?

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      If the union doesn’t provide any benefits and only costs money and prevents your state from functioning as well as it could and the union only makes solutions harder to solve … why stay in the union?

      States stay together because of mutual benefit, not because of a document or promises.

      And you could force a state to stay in a union by force but the cost of doing that far outweighs the benefits of a peaceful union.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        See my other response to peregrin5 but in addition you’re assuming rational actors all around. Actual reality is far more messy with many of those involved making decisions based more on feelings than any in depth reasoning. States stay together because there’s no obvious alternative. There’s no mechanism for a state to leave the union and doing so requires solving many problems that have no obvious answers.

    • boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The Trump administration has demonstrated that the constitution doesn’t really matter. Why keep pretending like this is some sort of sacred immutable text? The spell has been lifted.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Just because Trump and his goons are ignoring it doesn’t mean his cronies in congress and the supreme court won’t still use it to attack anyone they want to.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          But without boots on the ground, enforcement won’t happen. If Trump mobilized military on his own nation, he will well and truly enter the final find out phase of his life. The social contract is wearing thin.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Wouldn’t take the military, he can call on federal marshals, the FBI, the NSA, the CIA, and probably even some of the local police would be willing to become his dogs. He could also in theory deploy one states national guard into a different state although that’s a little shakier legal ground. That’s assuming of course that the local officials would refuse to appear in court or a congressional summons voluntarily. There’s also other ways of exerting pressure like refusing to issue federal funds (although that’s far less effective against Democrat states since they contribute more federal funds than they receive, particularly California).

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              National Guard is military. Using federal law enforcement might be on the table but they’re woefully underequipped to deal with California as a whole.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        yes, without any shared understanding around whether we enforce all laws or just some, law books are just reems of scratchy toilet paper. So are everyones holy books, and any international agreements we have.

        Trump doesnt care about laws and law enforcement has openly hated the public for a long time. Their oaths to serve the law are a vanity that they jettison whenever its convenient.

        And Biden/Harris violating god knows how many genocide and arms laws for zionist $ and then losing the election and support across every voting demographic didnt help matters. I wish I could go back in time to the day Obama picked Biden as his running mate and shake Obama until he picks someone else.

    • joostjakob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      It looks like they’re just going to lobby trading partners to please direct (actual) retaliatory sanctions towards products from red states, not their state. In general, I like that idea. But maybe now any excemptions for blue state products should come with a promise to actually fight the incipient fascist government…

    • eric5949@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      They did it during the pandemic, the union is quite literally dissolving before our very eyes.

  • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Would be fun to watch companies from other states bypass the tariffs by buying California products.

    Then of course, Trump will propose tariffs on a State.

  • mesa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It would be ironic if businesses come back to California because of the tariffs.

  • deepfuckingdumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is based on a quote “look at new opportunities to expand trade” and a tweet “California is here and ready to talk.” How definitive do those two things sound? How definitive does Newsweek’s title sound?

    Newsweek is a gossip rag.

    • Sprawl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Newsweek is pretty close to a tabloid these days. They are a tad better than the NY Post, but not by much.

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    lol i’m considering a move to Tijuana so i can commute to San Diego… if California can nix the chicken tax then i’m moving.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    Trump has got another great idea. A tax of 1.5 million dollars for each ship made in China that will dock at any American port, or 1 million if the ship is not made in china but the shipper fleet has a majority of Chinese ships.

    So, off before they did like California, Panama, Louisiana, new York, those stops will increase the price of shipping by 4.5 million dollars.

    Trump thinks that in this way, in a couple weeks, shipyards will reopen in the states and everyone will buy American ships. Because it takes a couple days to build an oil tanker

    Result:

    They’ll just unload the goods in Canada or Mexico then use trains/trucks. For oil and coal and wheat and other stuff that can’t be easily transported by land without ax existing infrastructure, that’s an additional 20% cost on top of tariffs. Inflation go go go

    • Lanske@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah Trump wants the US to be a great shipbuilder again… but for that you need materials (steel), workers who want to do that sort of job( he’s deporting a lot of people) and skill to manufacture ships…

      He thinks by taxing countries or companies, they will go to the US, but they won’t, and if they do it takes time and a lot of investment…

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Kudos to California. The neo-Nazi filled MAGA is all about state rights and I hope they tell California to secede.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Well, they could make a deal to buy at a price adjusted for tariffs so it’s a lower price then compensate for that with lower prices on CA exports you don’t actually need to stop tariffs legally, they can be worked around the trick is trading something back that makes up the difference and costs less than the tariff to give.

      • obvs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        38.3% of voters.

        Not 38.3% of the population.

        Pretty significant difference.

      • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Every place in the world has douchebags in it. I’m sure that the share of douchebags even among California voters is actually much larger than 38.3%, once you figure in the assholes who voted for someone else beside Trump (not to mention the people who didn’t vote at all). And you guys have your own Trump, Poilievre. Every country has assholes. Don’t forget that.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t understand why the north won and still allowed the Confederate flag, war criminals to be heroes name bases after war criminals. It boogles my mind and is probably one of the reasons America is where it is. The north never actually won just dominated for awhile.

          • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It is because we generally don’t obsess about the south like they obsess about themselves and the north.

            We have shit to do.

            Like an unemployed drunk staying at home, screaming at the TV and beating his wife because their life didn’t turn out well.

            While we have reasons not to be so trash.