• Susaga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Forbes did the math once and determined that Smaug, a dragon embodied by greed and selfishness, is worth $62 billion. There are 17 people richer than him.

    Smaug was shot in the heart and it was a morally good act.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Asking this on lemmy is like asking a pack of wolves if they enjoy the taste of lamb. You already know the answer you’re going to get…

  • ALQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 months ago

    Billionaires shouldn’t exist; no one needs that much money. They should be taxed until there are no more billionaires.

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think they’re bad for the economy. Money has to circulate. Every time a billionaire throws another million on the pile, they make things worse for everyone else.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This is a view we don’t see often enough. Everybody is into hating billionaires the way teenage girls hate the super-hot cheerleader. All they do is complain that it’s not “fair” for somebody to be so rich. There’s not enough discussion of the purely mechanical reasons extreme wealth is bad for the economy, not to mention the corruption opportunities it creates. The ultra-rich don’t spend their money, they just exchange it to trade big blocks of asset ownership back and forth. None of that money ever gets spent on a loaf of bread or a bus ticket, or a GI Joe with the kung fu grip. It essentially disappears from the economy. I don’t think most people even comprehend how that works - it involves more thought than reacting to memes.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        They literally steal work out of the system like a parasite. As you say, we shouldn’t be envious, but fix the problem with the money leaking away.

    • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t support violence at all. But for every mentioned woodchipper, this scene from Tucker & Dale vs Evil is mandatory:

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago
    1. I think wealth should be capped at a few million or tens of millions. Too much wealth hoarding keeps money out of circulation at the consumer spending level, which is bad for the economy in general, especially lower income people.
    2. Without knowing anything about a person and how they became a billionaire, I have no opinion on them individually. Jumping to conclusions about someone based on the group they belong to (like say, a black guy walking down the street) is bigoted thinking, no matter who the target is.
  • Apollo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ideally they’d be taxed into no longer being billionaires.

    Realistically we probably need to violently remind them who holds the actual power before this becomes a reality.