Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky warned that Ukraine would lose the war if the U.S., its primary military supporter, cuts funding.

Speaking to Fox News, he stressed the importance of unity between the U.S. and Ukraine as Russia accelerates its territorial gains.

Zelensky acknowledged Ukraine’s challenges on the battlefield, despite new U.S. weapon supplies, including long-range missiles and anti-personnel land mines.

He criticized German Chancellor Olaf Scholz for engaging with Putin, calling it a risky move.

Trump has pledged to end the war quickly but offered no specifics.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Give em full air support. If it causes world war 3, it causes world war 3. Fuck it. Avoiding that isn’t worth letting Russia just consume its neighbors on a whim - that shit certainly won’t stop with Ukraine.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Maybe if WW3 breaks out, Biden won’t hand over power to the literal fascists that are already making decisions to cause our demise.

      • Draces@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Wtf? That’s such a casual suggestion to dismantle democracy. Yeah let’s do that so we never get a progressive in office /s

        • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          If we’re going to have an autocracy, it may as well be the one that is still somewhat benevolent to the common man.

          • Draces@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            If we’re going to have an autocracy

            Yeah I’d rather not. I agree if that that were the only two options it would be preferable but I totally disagree that those are the only two options and I think it’s extremely dangerous rhetoric to say anyone should be an autocrat. Trump is about to be president and is the biggest threat to American democracy we’ve seen in anyone’s living memory. But he’s also about to become deeply unpopular again like every president does after election and particular bad as people start to remember what he’s like. That is a far cry from a guarantee that it’s over. Irreparable damage will be done but it’s just silly to race to the bottom

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          It wouldn’t be the first time a country did that. It’s never ended particularly well though.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        wow yeah I hope we have global nuclear apocalypse so we can avoid the consequences of elections! totally worth.

      • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That doesn’t sound very good either. I still want a chance to vote in another election. Trump might be able to dismantle it before then but if Biden held on to power it would be immediately dismantled.

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      Russia is also already instigating it with having North Korean troops in the combat zone. It’ll just be a tit-for-tat response.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Up to 100k North Koreans. I don’t care how inept they are, 100k dudes with guns will utterly wreck Ukraine.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Incompetent soldiers still consume a great deal of resources, and may become victims of even cheaper drones.

          But “cheaper” still requires some money.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I heard rumors of South Korea sending troops to counter. I don’t want world war but that seems fair to me.

          • foenkyfjutschah@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            it would be more fair that every online bellicist (no matter what camp) enlisted voluntarily and got the chance to validate their theories in practice.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Bold stance. Better to bring about world war 3 than let Russia consume its neighbors? I’ll have to sit with that one for a bit.

      I grew up with the USSR so maybe I’m not quite ready to throw all earthly civilization into the fire to prevent 20% of that empire from being restored.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          The way they’re struggling in Ukraine. 3 years for what they thought would be 3 days, and they haven’t accomplished their goal.

          Plus, several of the former USSR states are formal NATO members: the Baltics. With Russia struggling to hold the worst 1/3 of Ukraine, what on Earth makes you think they could sustain a war with NATO, proper?

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      Give em full air support. If it causes world war 3, it causes world war 3. Fuck it

      If you are so willing to die you can join the front and fight russia in ukraine. Don’t drag other people and the rest of the world in.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      Give em full air support. If it causes world war 3, it causes world war 3. Fuck it

      If you are so willing to die you can join the front and fight russia in ukraine. Don’t drag other people and the rest of the world in.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Same page as catloaf - I already did my time and got my honorable discharge. If WW3 breaks out, pretty sure I’ll be getting recalled. So, yes.

        Then again, the alternative is wait for shit to destabilize until we get there anyway - again this shit won’t end with Ukraine.

        Call Russia’s bluff. If we’re wrong, it’s not like we aren’t fucked anyway. Might as well go down fighting evil, vs going down with evil’s dick in our throat.

        *looks at recent presidential election*

        …oh yeah. Reality. Pass the lube, my throat is sore as fuck.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They’d rather have us back as training personnel. Most of us are broken in some way that makes deployment problematic unless we’re actually desperate. Then they can dump most of TRADOC into leadership spots for new units.

        • foenkyfjutschah@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I already did my time and got my honorable discharge. […] , it’s not like we aren’t fucked anyway.

          you mistakingly switched from your specific miserable situation in singular to a general assumption in the plural form.

        • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Because of you don’t stop Russia now, there is a big chance that in a few years it’s a gangbang with the all the Brics nations who learned to handle the nuclear whip like a pro dom.

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          You don’t have to wait, instead of wasting time commenting here you are free to join the front in ukraine

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    If US cuts funding it would be abandoning its allies in violation of the Budapest memorandum which the US signed in '94 to protect Ukraine if Russia invades, and that violation from Russia since 2014 also grants Ukraine back its nuclear program which should have been supported by allies like the US. The only language a dictator like Putin understands is violence or the threat of violence, look at the nuclear saber rattling he does frequently and how people and nations capitulate to it and the only neighbors they avoid are either nuclear armed or NATO allied.

    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There is no treaty that the US has with Ukraine that obligates the US to defend Ukraine. Stop spreading misinformation.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m all for America funding as much as possible, but FFS Europe, the monster is ringing your doorbell.

    • Metz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That reads as if the EU is just sitting on its hands and doing nothing. Please keep in mind that there is significant financial support coming from the EU:

      image

      Source: https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/

      Where the EU cannot compete with the US is in the supply of military goods. For the simple reason that these do not exist to the extent that the US has them.


      Edit: I have to correct myself in a detail. The graph of course shows Europe not the EU. So it includes e.g. the UK as well. The point still stands though looking on the rest of the data.

      • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Jesus fuck that really puts it into perspective how much larger the United States military complex is. I want to to see this combined with the Israeli financing. I mean is what we bitch about being bad over budgeting of the defense budget or whatever it falls under really just a means of paying other countries to fight battles they used to send US soldiers to fight? Did I just become pro-military complex?

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nice sources! Puts things in perspective for me. I really mean that.

        Still doesn’t change the fact that the enemy is at the gates. And has been for decades. And it ain’t America’s gates. Which is not to say, “Not our problem.” It eventually will be our problem.

        Europe has to spin up a war economy. Yesterday. We Americans have the privilege of being able to do that with two oceans buffering us. Europe has no such buffer. Once again, the filthy Russians are knocking.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-reviews-plan-halt-us-military-aid-ukraine-unless-it-negotiates-peace-with-2024-06-25/

    Trump’s plan is just to force Ukraine to hand whatever the Russians have taken over to the Russians, or whatever or they stop getting aid.

    The Kremlin said any peace plan proposed by a possible future Trump administration would have to reflect the reality on the ground but that Russian President Vladimir Putin remained open to talks.

    The Kremlin said any peace plan proposed by a possible future Trump administration would have to reflect the reality on the ground but that Russian President Vladimir Putin remained open to talks.

    So Putin’s puppet will let them take what they have under control…and knowing Trump and Putin, probably more, like sanctions or stripping Ukraine of more autonomy.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    That was kind of the point. Trump, Putin and Netanyahu are playing everyone. Started the Gaza attack knowing Americans move on and will forget about Ukraine once Gaza is in flames and he was right. Americans don’t care about Ukraine anymore, they’ve moved on and voted with Putin. Just waiting for the next conflict now that will distract everyone away from Gaza

  • index@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ukrainian people and russian people already lost the war, casualties are up to a million

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean all offense when I say this that is a stupid idea and you should be ashamed to have even thought of it. Essentially saying Biden should get some American soldiers killed so he can prevent trump from taking office.

      You can’t claim trump is a fascist and also suggest using fascism as a weapon to prevent fascism.

    • Homescool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Dunno how a state of emergency would stall the transition of power. That’s happening no matter what. On time. Period.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          No. It very much is not in his powers.

          Biden’s term ends at noon in 2 months. He can’t just declare that it doesn’t. If he could, Trump would have done that in 2021 instead of trying to overturn the election.

        • Decoy321@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s because there wasn’t any law against it at that time. Now we’ve got the 22nd amendment.

  • krashmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This issue is a great example of the insane double think that most of Europe has about the US. We are too involved in world affairs until someone needs to take military action and then all of a sudden we’re the only ones who can address it. Ukraine is your neighbor, not ours. You should be the ones funding Ukraine’s defense because if you don’t Russia is on your doorstep. Ukraine should have so much money that it doesn’t matter what the US does but instead all of Europe is looking on like “it’s a shame a country on the other side of the world isn’t doing enough to stop this”.

    Edit: lots of people proving my point for me below. Downvote if you like but Europe is gonna have to step up or watch Ukraine fall. There isn’t a third option no matter how much you wish there was.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That being said, it’s not crazy to ask the country who has been developing anti-Russian weapons for 50 years to donate those weapons to an anti-Russian cause. That’s what they were built for after all.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        5 months ago

        More than anything your statement just makes me wonder why the phrase “the country who has been developing anti-Russian weapons for 50 years” does not refer to a European country. They seem to have been content to outsource defense spending for the last half century at least and now are acting surprised that they have to rely on someone else for defense.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sure, the US will at the same time see a lot of their international soft power evaporate. The US is showing what it means if they for decades keep riling up a country, rattling sabers only to not be home when it counts. Taiwan and whole of Asia Pacific is watching this.

      Also the US will see their intelligence networks dry up, humint will become less reliable and less likely to reach them. Tulay gabbard as head of the national intelligence in the US means a lot of countries cannot share their intelligence with the US anymore.

      That will surely help the US prevent their next international tragedy.

      And if the US emboldens dictators around the world and make the whole less stable, what happens to the world economy and all these countries the US sells to… they can’t afford… or shop elsewhere. Especially the EU fending for themselves will probably mean short term gains for the US in weapons sales, and then they stop. The EU will have been forced to do everything in house and the US will lose a massive customer base. And create a larger competitor at the same time.

      The examples of this short sighted way of thinking are endless. But it is true the EU needs to do more in terms of re-armament. Because the US is an untrustworthy Partner.

      Just like Putin proved to be when our leaders made him too important in our energy market… he leveraged his power. Now trump will do the same.

      I hope you people in the US will be OK, because if you think we will have it bad because if this, if only a part of what maga says they will actually happen, you’ll be in for a heck of a ride.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        We’re definitely not looking at a good time on the home front that’s for sure. I agree with the rest of what you said as well. People don’t seem to like it being pointed out to them though. Perhaps they think Trump will not pull funding from Ukraine but if I had to bet on all the things Trump will do over the next four years that would be in my top 3.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well, I wonder if the US defense contractors and Trumps team will play nice. Because Biden gave them a shit ton of extra billions. I wonder if the dynamic duo will try and play rough with the defense sector to save the 2 trillion of waste.

          The US defense had a huge stockpile of equipment that was aging out or even needed decommissioning.

          And a new generation of tech needed to be battlefield tested.

          By doing this the US was able to:

          • funnel extra cash into the defense sector (the US version of welfare)
          • give the military the extra cash to buy new stuff
          • get rid of old and unwanted stock
          • save money on storage, maintenance and decommissioning of old stock.
          • Show their allies they are the arsenal of democracy and can be counted on… while showing their adversaries they will go to bat for their allies.
          • Be on the right side of history.

          What I mean to say is the US got a bargain on crippling one of their main geopolitical adversaries. It only cost them old military stuff they did not want anymore, while boasting about billions… that never left the US and stimulates the US economy.

          I honestly don’t get how the Dems can do such awesome things in the last 4 years and are unable to tell people about it.