• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Two of them is roughly the size of a pickup truck…

      Like, it’s volume, they could say X gallons, but it would be hard for people to visualize. So people use an example most readers would be familiar with.

      Have you honestly never wondered why journalists use random things? Or has no one taken the time to answer before?

      It’s been common literally for centuries before either of us were born, but most likely all of human existence. Just with animals like buffalo instead of pickup trucks.

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The problem is he’s Unfortunately, short, so he has a hard time on visualizing things like the size of pick up, which are quite large

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Go to Boston, and you will near the story about how an engineering class from MIT was asked to measure the distance across a bridge without using any established unit of measure. So this picked this guy named Smoot and counted off how many Smoots the bridge were.

        For some reason, they tell this story to tourists as proof of ingenuity but it was the most pointless exercise I could imagine in engineering.

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          So, how would you make that measurement?

          The point of the lesson was to teach creative problem-solving. And a by-product of that, all measuring systems are simply arbitrary units made up by some random dude. And that in the end, no one standard is better than another. All that matters is that enough people agree upon a standard that is reproducible to a level of accuracy that is Good Enoughtm and fit for purpose.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      And are we talking a reasonable work truck, or one of those American abominations referred to as ‘pickup trucks.’

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    falling from the the sky and burning is a good thing, bigger concern is them staying up there for too long

      • expatriado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        communication satellites are low earth orbit to reduce latency, that means +25000 km/h velocity to sustain orbit, and would also have a very shallow entry angle, that combination means total vaporization

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          i mean, with that many satellites what are the odds (i have the smoked 2 joints stupids) something fucks up and it doesn’t come in at that shallow entry angle?

        • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Low earth orbit is most survivable reentry trajectory… coming in at a higher angle significantly increases the heating.

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The vaporized materials themselves are a problem. When we’re building these mega-constellations, we’re putting some real mass up there. We’re introducing all sorts of exotic materials into the stratosphere that would not naturally occur there at those concentrations. And remember, this is a very sensitive environment. The actual volume of CFCs we introduced into the stratosphere wasn’t that large. The volume of all our AC refrigerant and hair spray cans was nothing compared to the atmosphere. We may actually not be that far from the sheer volume of satellites affecting the ozone layer as they decay.

            The stratosphere is an environment like any other. It has a finite ability to absorb and process any form of pollution without noticeable and significant effects. I’m not qualified enough to estimate the number of satellite reentries to damage the ozone layer or to have other deleterious effects, but at least from that study featured in that video, we may not be far off. The story of civilization has been repeatedly realizing that what we once considered infinite dumping grounds were anything but. And the stratosphere is no different.

            Edit: may have misinterpreted parent comment and went off on a wild tangent.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Falling from the sky a good thing?

      Ok well hope neither you nor a loved one is standing under it then. Cuz you sure aren’t hoping so. Go learn some humanity in the meanwhile.

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    How awesome would it be for Donald Trump, Joe Rogan, Dana White, and Elon Musk himself to get smashed by a Musk satellite during a photo op in the octagon at the White House UFC fight.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I love how this is simultaneously a great and horrible photoshop. Like the splice is obvious in the foreground but I can’t see it in the background at all. Like I have no idea how this was done.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Nah, I just wasn’t looking close enough, it’s just a simple paste of one image on top of another from the same angle. If you follow the line where the truck ends upwards, you can see a similar line on the roof of the building and the tree in the background doesn’t quite line up perfectly (but it’s close enough that our brains assume it’s fine).

          That might have even been done in paint rather than gimp or ps.

          • tb_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            There is some line on the roof, but the roof still strangely lines up. The tree in the background nor the sky have a visible line.

            Furthermore the text on the tire is garbled, and the whole image has this “covered in vaseline” feeling to it.

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              You’re right about the sky, though I think the tree does have a line but the blur hides it (I can see it when I include the line in the roof but not when I block it). I’d say that it is more sophisticated than paint, but that an image editor was used to take the cloud from only one of the images.

              I disagree that the tire text is garbled. https://www.bfgoodrich.ca/en/auto/garage/articles/making-of-the-ko3-tire here’s a picture of a similar tire with the same text. AI might have been used for some of the editing of that transition, but I don’t think the source images were genAI.

    • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you split it this way you end up with more than half of the weight, you need to split it down the middle through front and rear bumpers.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t understand what kind of capitalist pig you need to be to allow private companies access to low orbit.