An Oklahoma man who was doing target practice in his backyard on Christmas is believed to have shot and killed an elderly woman a few blocks from his home, authorities said.

Cody Wayne Adams, 33, has been charged with first-degree manslaughter in connection with the deadly shooting, court filings show.

The victim was on a covered front porch with family members at a residence in Comanche when she was shot Thursday afternoon, according to the probable cause affidavit. She was holding a baby in her left arm while seated on a love seat when she was struck in her right upper arm, according to the affidavit. The bullet then entered her chest cavity, it said.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Just gonna politely point out that America is living under extreme corruption and tyranny right now, and the 2nd amendment aint doing shit to help with that problem. Sure gets lots of innocent citizens killed though.

    Just like any expected conflict ever, the 2nd amendment caused an arms race - and the govt is far, far more heavily armed than the people.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      System works as designed. The second amendment fuckwits never cared about freedom and democracy at all.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Statistically speaking, buying that handgun is going to dramatically increase your odds of dying by firearm.

        • thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 days ago

          Not sure who’s downvoting this but the claim is verifiable.

          Here’s a John Hopkins report from 2023: https://publichealth.jhu.edu/center-for-gun-violence-solutions/data/annual-gun-violence-data

          What I think is the most interesting, and a fact I learned taking a firearms safety course here in Canada, is that the highest risk remains suicide.

          From the report: Gun suicides have accounted for the majority of all gun deaths each year since 1995.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 days ago

            Having a gun can turn that fleeting ideation into a permanent decision real quick.

            • TronBronson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 days ago

              Gun is probably the easiest cheapest way to access assisted suicide in the USA. That not-so-fleeting ideation probably drives a lot of people to the local Walmart to get a gun since its easier than getting a doctors appointment.

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            I personally think suicide is my right. Also when someone says that they want a gun to protect themselves… and someone states that it’s more likely to result in a gun death, but forgets to mention the suicide part… it’s disingenuous and that’s probably why the downvotes. Say the whole statistic. Maybe it really is a mental health crisis and not a gun problem. The biggest danger to a gun owner is themself. It gives you the power to end your life at your leisure which is really bad… because you haven’t created enough shareholder value or paid enough taxes yet. How can you consider buying a gun to end your life when it life itself is so fucking magical ya know?

            Either way Smith and Wesson issues my insurance policy. This is America people.

            • thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 days ago

              Kind of feel like we’re talking past each other.

              Suicide is your right. No qualms with that. I support thoughtful assisted dying and no one can stop you from taking your own life if you are determined to do so.

              But the comment mentioning a dramatically increased probability of death by firearm isn’t disingenuous. They were answering someone talking about acquiring a firearm to protect themselves from others. I think it’s reasonable to remind anyone considering a firearm for self protection to understand they’re more likely to die by firearm as a result of that choice no matter how the death occurs. Even if suicide is the bulk of gun deaths it’s not the only cause - and so while being even more fully informed is helpful, I don’t agree that the warning is misleading in any way, I’d argue it remains just as factual.

              It also doesn’t have to be either or: it can be both a mental health crisis and a gun crisis.

              I’m also not unilaterally anti-firearm; I enjoy long distance marksmanship and hand loading precision cartridges quite a bit. That said, I understand the choices I’m making and the risks that come with them; taking every precaution I can to protect those around me from harm.

              • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 days ago

                Totally agree with you, I mostly take quarrel with OP you were replying to. Yes owning a gun makes you much more likely to die in a gun incident. It opens to door to so many preventable tragedies in your own home. I just feel like that statistic demands the explanation that this includes people who bought a gun with the intention of suicide. It includes all the people who bought a gun with intention to resolve a conflict. It includes the biggest most negligent idiots you know, who will probably be shot by their children in a “tragic” accident. If you’re a law abiding, risk mitigating person scared of ICE showing up at your door… and you’d like a fire arm because that feels tyrannical, I’m gonna say you’re gonna be a wee bit better off than the statistic suggests.

                IKYK, sounds like we have similar views on firearms in America. Bit of a quagmire innit. Hate watching it be discussed without nuance.

        • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          I know, probably partly because if you intend to use it, you’re more likely to get shot instead, or shoot yourself.That’s why it’s only a consideration, but also, domestic tensions are…less than ideal.

          But I have no kids, I’d take lessons and practice first, and I’d never leave ammo loaded. I do not want a gun in my home. I’m fine keeping them animated and fired with a gamepad.

          And I’d like to think in the very unlikely situation I’d need it, I wouldn’t, like, engage, like an idiot.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    Law enforcement investigating the shooting canvassed several residences to the north of the deadly shooting and found that all but one – Adams’ – had “suitable shooting backstops or firing locations,” according to the affidavit.

    So… pretty much everyone in the area had a shooting range except the accused?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      A “backstop” is not a shooting range…

      It’s usually just a pile of dirt.

      It’s wild for a bunch of people in a neighborhood to all be doing this, because even if the first couple are kind of safe about it, every idiot starts thinking jt’s safe to just shoot at a can or anything. All they know is they hear gunshots

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        20 days ago

        Sounds like a terrible neighbourhood to live in, shots going off from everyone all the time

      • Burninator05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        My parents have a place to shoot in their yard. It’s a stack of old railroad ties four deep, two wide and ten tall with dirt piled up around the back. There is an empty field for over a mile behind that. I can’t imagine using it if anyone was any closer.

        • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 days ago

          Under the right conditions, the NATO 5.56 x 45 mm can travel u to 3600 meters (4,000 yards). If one round, for some reason is shot above the berm, one mile is not enough. It does not take much to fuck up.

    • Floodedwomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yeah, this happened literally 4 houses down from me. We all shoot guns, but we have targets, and those that dont go down to the bridge and fire into the creek bank. This whole thing is because he was lazy/stupid.

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    If only that baby were armed, it could have returned fire and everything would have been okay. More guns is the solution!

    • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      It’s insane to me how many people think that taking guns away will actually increase the violence… like the people that would normally shoot up a place would suddenly become experts at building bombs and take out WAY more people… when the reality is that those people would probably be more likely to blow themselves up trying to build a bomb… guns are so simple to kill with, a toddler could do it. Building a bomb or something equivalent is much harder than pulling a trigger.

      • If the polive was actually useful, then maybe getting rid of guns could be a good thing.

        But as an Asian American. I know about the Korean Americans during LA Riots who had to protect their stores by themselves because the authorities didn’t give a shit.

        Asian Diaspora are one of the most vulnerable groups. Because a lot of us have successful bussinesses and racists are jealous and like to target us.

        So I’d prefer well regulated militias than police. Especially in the context of America where cops are horrible.

      • AxExRx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Especially since we have a model of what that society looks like, with places like Japan and great britain, most of Europe etc. They de-escalate to knife crime picking up the majority.

      • possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        vehicle ramming attacks are constantly increasing. people who want to kill will find a way to kill with whatever tools they have available.

        • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          I’d choose you trying to run me down with a vehicle over shooting at me with an AR15 any day of the week.

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            Well I think most of the population would think guns. Judging by how we use firing squads for capital punishment and not Dodge Rams. You might be able to sell this idea to the prison/auto industries. Have you considered consulting or lobbying?

            • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              So what you’re saying is, that you believe a Dodge Ram is a more effective killing tool than a firing squad? I can’t tell if you’re being facetious or just plain didn’t read anything here.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    20 days ago

    Yup, that’s why if you’re going to practice, do so on a range and always consider: what the hell is BEHIND/AROUND my target?

    JFC for a nation as obsessed with firearms as the United States, the level of firearms safety knowledge is shockingly low.

    • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 days ago

      People in my neck of the woods talk about fire arms the way I talk about video games or TV shows. They sound like recreation rather than self defense. I don’t know if knowledge is the only factor; a sense of seriousness about firearms seems to be lacking.

      • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        To be fair if guns were legal in my area I’d totally have one for fun. They look like a ton of fun. Probably best I’m not allowed one

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Yep people shoot around where I live on their own 2 acre plot of land. Always know what’s behind your target “there are trees” and what’s behind those trees Joe?

        • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          There’s a house in an adjacent neighborhood that occasionally fires guns to a degree that it sounds like a gun battle is taking place. This story will make me wonder about their gun safety.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    The dumbfuck Adams is one of many reasons why the USA needs stricter gun control. I wonder if the worthless POS is a Charlie Kirk supporter.

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    Gun rights, keeping people safe since… Never.

    And keeping tyrants who abuse the constitution in check since… Also never.

  • Cloudstash@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    20 days ago

    “I’m a responsible gun owner, i have owned guns since the dawn of light” - Proceeds to 360 no-scope the neighbor.

    Well, no, the average gun owner in USA is not a responsible gun owner.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      The average gun owner is responsible, it’s all these super owners who skew the stats. The average gun owner owns one pistol that’s locked away in a case or safe and only sees the light of day when it’s opened at the range.

      Then there are super owners who skew the results and have a half dozen guns and shoot them off at their property with no bullet berm or any actual range safety practices. They keep their guns on their bedside table, by the door, etc, always loaded with the excuse that it would take too long to deal with safety practices if there is an intruder.

      These are the people you hear about in the news. The more guns the less safe in my experience.

      • Cloudstash@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        In the eyes of an American perhaps, sure, but if you come from a civilized place on the world, well simply no…and we still are allowed to own guns, its simply not handed out like candy.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 days ago

    There’s gotta be a name for the look where a physically unfit/poor performing American tries to offset this by donning physically “tough” fashion accessories and hair dos.

    I know there’s gravy seals, but they kind of take it to the next level.

    This, it’s more like a defence mechanism. Like they’d totally get their ass kicked in literally anything—fighting, jogging, getting up out of a chair—but they keep themselves safe by dressing up and casting tough stares.

    • agedcorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      1st degree doesn’t mean premeditated, it means to the highest degree. A murder charge typically implies premeditation whereas manslaughter implies recklessness.

      1st degree manslaughter sounds right to me, killing someone accidentally through extreme recklessness in this case.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Geez, if he’d lived any closer it would have gone through her and into the baby as well. Although she probably dropped the baby in any case.

  • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    When a deputy said he suspected the shooting may have caused the victim’s death, Adams “became visibly upset and began to cry,” the affidavit stated. The deputy also told him that “while he was shooting towards the ground in his backyard that there was nothing behind his property to stop any bullets from traveling beyond his property and hurting someone,” the affidavit stated.

    The state failed. This man should have not been allowed to own a handgun without proper training. I’d bet in this moment he had no idea bullets would bounce up. Just sad that some basic laws would solve this.

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yes because those are less lethal. Under no pretense. We need proper education of firearm safety and usage like we need better education of car safesty and usage.

      • Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        Yeah, but allowing people to have guns is killing hella people for no other reason than “I like guns”. Nobody is resisting anything or keeping anyone safe or stopping the bad guy. It’s just raining bullets and people who are okay with it use the Constitution to allow it to continue. (The Constitution, as it turns out, is fucking bullshit.)