This is like your boss finding shit to do when there’s nothing to do.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hegseth criticizes Scouting for being “genderless” and for promoting diversity, equity and inclusion.

    Imagine thinking this is a BAD thing.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Imagine thinking it’s true.

      The Boy Scouts of America had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century by way of multiple sexual abuse scandals, a dwindling membership, and repeated bankruptcy.

      This isn’t DEI, it’s a desperate appeal for more warm bodies in the program to shore up a dying movement.

      It’s BAD in the sense that Scouting has largely become (arguably always had been) an MLM run by and for the benefit of a few connected business savvy insiders. And drawing in more grist for the mill only delays the inevitable failure of this corrupt and sclerotic institution.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s BAD in the sense that Scouting has largely become (arguably always had been) an MLM run by and for the benefit of a few connected business savvy insiders.

        Could be worse: could be Girl Scouts.


        Seriously though, if both Girl Scouts and “Scouting America” suck, is there some other alternative (short of not participating in a scouting-like organization at all)?

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      But this is a fairly recent thing that Boy Scouts has become more inclusive.

      My kids were just moving up when they were opening cub scouts. As a parent I thought it was great that it made it more family oriented. No one complained about the girls, no one complained that women were now able to run camping events, no one complained that there were entire families at camping events.

      I have no idea how they approached it for Boy Scouts.

      But the thing is, this is change, recent change. And change is scary. Regressives want to hold back change, even to a past more mythical than real

    • ronigami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean, it’s kind of a bad thing when the literal whole point of Boy Scouts was to foster masculine qualities for boys. They had Girl Scouts for something else. And you could create a third Genderfree Scouts instead but no, they just got rid of Boy Scouts.

      • Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ah yes the masculine qualities of camping in the woods. Helping out the community, and doing crafts. Wait…

        Since when is messing around in the outdoors, helping out in the community, and making things masculine?

        Can’t wait to tell my mom she’s a man! And I’ll be sure to remind my dad who’s a lot more of a homebody and enjoys making experimental deserts he shoulda joined the girlscouts…

        Values are masculine and feminine as perceived by society not as a result of any inherent “energy”. Let people do what they want and don’t force labels down their throats.

        • ronigami@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          When did I imply people shouldn’t do what they want? Ah yes, the classic ‘make up a thing to get mad about’ activity of keyboard warriors.

          You’re basically being the “what is a woman?” guy. Masculinity and femininity can exist without being defined. Just let them be.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Was scouts supposed to ge about fostering “masculine” values ever?

    I never did it, but I always thought it was about learning useful skills and confidence, appreciating nature (leave the camp cleaner than you found it) and learning how to work towards your goals.

    Those things are not inherently masculine. They’re for everyone.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent.

      Nope, nothing in there about masculine.

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ugh, I still remember that whole list by heart. I did and do take issue with “obedient” and “reverent.” Question authority.

        • 5too@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m honestly not clear if this is a sarcastic comment or not.

          For myself - those all seem like gender neutral virtues, viewed separately and together. I don’t know that I agree with each one as a virtual, but I don’t see anything that would or should apply to one gender more than another.

          • JandroDelSol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            yeah, it was a mean spirited comment, I just get pissed off when positive traits get gendered. all of these are good things for people to be, doesn’t matter the gender

    • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes. And growing up in NY my experience with them was a lot less toxic than what some people here are describing, so it really was pretty much just about that.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, I’m from Jersey, and similar to you it was just a thing for boys to do. There was no homophobia, we accepted from the weird kid to the sporty kid, and eveyone in between, and sometimes there were cliques and sometimes we whittled soap. We went camping sometimes. There was fire, yeah, that seems to be ubiquitous among the boy scouts.

        I stopped when I got bored. There were no scandals.

        • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah, as far as I know, none of the boys were being victimized by the orthodontist scout leader, and there was no serious religious aspect. Most of the kids were probably from liberal Jewish families who went to temple mainly on the high holidays, regardless. I quit because the camping trips kept getting cancelled, and that was the main reason I enjoyed it.

          Christ, why can’t we just have normal things that are what they’re supposed to be, without wackjobs corrupting it?

          • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I think we can and do have normal things. I feel like exposure to mass media brings problems right to your door, and it just isn’t how it is. At the same time, there is a bit of responsibility that falls on your (my) shoulders to be involved. I certainly won’t stand by while some bullshit is going down especially bullshit that my kids are exposed to. I will let kids be kids, but I won’t let them be poisoned with negative, fearful nonsense.

            And so yeah, my response to much of the crippling depression that’s blasted at us over the past 10 years has been to stick my head in the sand. And people here will chastise me for this, but I refuse to take on global problems when I’ve got things right here that need my attention. I know this isn’t exactly what we’re talking about, but I come to Lemmy to philosophize.

    • khepri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d say, as far as being distinct from the Girl Scouts, that the two groups had basically identical values and goals. Boy Scouts maybe leaned a little heavier on the camping and knot tying and outdoor skills, but both were mainly focused on building good character, community service, basic life skills, etc.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Like ten years ago, Girl Scouts in my town had a civil war, because they were leaning too heavily on “girl”activities. A bunch of the girls defected to Boy scouts to do “more fun activities”

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Something about the phrase boy friendly spaces sounds very odd to me. Certainly doesn’t sound like the warrior mentality ole drunk Pete is going for does it?

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      He should just use “safe spaces.” Much clearer and surely he’d get the full support of everyone who supports this

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    He also just tried to remove nooses and swazticas from the military’s recognized hate symbols so this tracks. I fully expect this administration to announce some form of Shitler youth indoctrination program any day now.

  • khepri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I was in cub/boy scouts from ages maybe 10 all the way up aging out at 18. It was mostly about being homophobic, knives, and fire aka the three pillars of young white boys in the 90’s. I couldn’t be happier at how they’ve been trying to turn things around these past 10 years.

    Also, Fed involvement with the Scouts is minimal. Apparently they provide logistical support at Nat’l Jamboree (not that I ever saw) and give tours of bases and stuff (not that I ever saw). So this seems, at best, performative.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wait until he finds out our old pack burned flags!

    Back when patriotism was “normal”, Scouts along with veterans helped organize and run a regional event to properly and respectfully retire worn flags. It was a huge deal

    • Derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Czech here, glad Scouts hold the flag to the same standard everywhere. We used to burn the flag if it touched the ground or was “desecrated” in a different way.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I hope current scouts in your country can still treat such things as normal. Here in the US, any patriotic symbolism has been taken by the crazies.

        • Derpgon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          They still do! At least our center does. Other were saying it they do it as well, but that was about 10 years ago, and I hope they still do it.

          It is not treated as some kind of patriotism, it is merely to uphold the highest standard for a national symbol.

          But nobody here really treats it as overly dramatic or extreme.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      When I was 10 or so where my cousin was part of the boy scout flag retirement It was pretty elaborate with speeches, explanations, demonstration on how to start a fire, a whole folding mini ceremony complete with symbolism about each fold signifance and then love music during the actual buring. Maybe 40-50 people in the audience?

      I asked my navy uncle on the way home “I thought burning flags was a bad thing…?” and he promptly told me to shut the fuck up, they did it the only correct way and not ask stupid questions.

      Never wanted to do anything scout related again. Weird lil 'MERICA indoctrination culty shit.

  • blitzen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The scouts have come a long way in the past few years. But I imagine most of the adult that make up that organization are republican voters, and you reap what you sow.

    • khepri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      My troop was always pretty chill and inclusive (for a 90s Boy Scout troop). But yes, of course an all-male organization with ranks and uniforms and a big emphasis on faith and patriotism is going to attract more conservatives (and pedos!) than your area’s average.

  • mayorchid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I feel a bit of schadenfreude for this one. I was bullied harder in Boy Scouts than I ever was at school or church. None of the leaders ever noticed or did jack shit about it. There was an expectation of physical strength and ability that I was never able to meet. The uniforms were ridiculously expensive. And the higher levels of the local org were deeply cultish under the surface and intertwined with the Mormon church in bizarre ways (this was before the Mormon church stopped being an official sponsor of scouting).

    I know things have gotten better lately, and the current administration is incapable of doing good things, but if Scouting goes bankrupt I will not shed a tear.

    • khepri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      yeah man those Mormon-only troops were another flavor for sure lol. Mormonism + nationalism + being 14 + a uniform is a helluva drug it turns out.