What older movies made a good use of either side stepping special effects or have effects that somehow still hold up today? Why are they good movies?

  • bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lord of the Rings effects still hold up, in my opinion at least. The Balrog uses a lot of “hidden” information with the use of blackness to cover up bad cgi. Horse charges are zoomed out far enough to disguise how few horses are actually there. Most of the movies use practical effects though.

    • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Especially when you compare the effects in Lord of the Rings to the Hobbit. You can really see when the studio is overworked and underpaid, even when it’s a studio as good as weta.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I can usually turn a blind eye to bad CGI, but The Hobbit was next-level awful. It wasn’t so much bad as unfinished. I felt I was watching a pirated movie before post production was complete.

        • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Check out the M4 fan edit. I recommend this at every opportunity haha. They cut down the entire extended trilogy into a 4 hour film, covering only the events in The Hobbit novel. One of the many adjustments they make is colour correction, which really helps with the “unfinished” feel you’re talking about. It’s incredibly well done, and aside from a few janky cuts is the definitive version of The Hobbit movies imo.

    • F/15/Cali@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, I was racking my brain to find a major movie filmed in the last decade without digital effects so that I could induce a recognition of the passage of time, and I couldn’t manage it. Covid started more than half a decade ago, and modern movies rarely use solely practical effects

  • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    Blade Runner (1982) still looks incredible. The miniatures and attention to detail in design effectively set the tone for subsequent cyberpunk.

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    Star wars, with models and miniatures.

    Most great old movies, where cheesy effects were irrelevant next to the story.

    Gravity Falls Little Gift Shop of Horrors, where the characters watch an ‘incredibly expensive’ stop motion scene that we (the audience) only see as reflected shadows.

    • Devadander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Just gave the special editions a rewatch. The cgi inserted scenes have aged incredibly poorly, especially compared to the rest of the 1977 effects

    • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      And matte paintings. Never forget the legendary artists who turned paintings into scenery, or the camera workers who managed to blend in the actors to them.

      • That first legendary pan-down to Tattooine, which the Tantive IV and Star Destroyer then fly past? Matte painting.
      • The sterile hangars and seemingly-bottomless pits of the Death Star? Matte painting.
      • The busy Rebel hangar on Yavin IV? Also a matte painting. I seem to remember reading that some of the hangar floor markings - besides making it look like an actual hangar - served to help align the matte with the set shots and coordinate extras so they wouldn’t accidentally walk out of the filmed segment and behind a matte portion.
  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Jaws.

    The shark prop didn’t work well and looked terrible, which resulted in much of it being left out of the movie. The movie is more terrifying because of this.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Gremlins. My brother and I were just discussing this because we heard that the new Gremlins movie will be using analog effects.

  • Masamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    You want old movies? How about Royal Wedding (1951). It has a scene where Fred Astaire dances on the walls and ceiling. There’s no cgi or special effects, it was just done with a simple camera trick.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Forever underappreciated. They were hiring research professors at universities to do that stuff. It was so cutting edge that it was actually experimental.

      • noughtnaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        And they got disqualified from the Oscars “because they cheated” – the following year there was a brand new nomination category for computer generated effects…

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    Matrix 1. Other than some CGI, it doesn’t have so much special effects as much as it has special camera tricks.

  • anomoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I was kind of shocked how well Flight of the Navigator held up when I rewatched it for the first time as an adult a couple of years ago. The effects used for the ship were great.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      It was a favourite growing up (up there’s with Explorers, The Goonies to me back then), I hadn’t watched it in decades till a few years ago. I also thought it held up really well. Besides the exterior spaceship there’s minimal effects anyways (plus cute aliens of course which were practical) it’s more an odd buddy (new friend?) comedy. I still thought what was there was for the ship effects held up better than expected for the time.

      Course may be rose tinted glasses and all, but I really enjoyed it last time still, plus time travel is always awesome.

  • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I can’t believe no one has said The Thing yet.

    The creature effects are so good, it holds up today.