• Farmington Hills officials are fuming over a glut of unsold Cybertrucks being stored in the city.
  • Tesla has been parking the EVs at a shopping center earmarked for major redevelopment.
  • Officials say the electric vehicles violate zoning codes and are warning the property owner.
  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    The property owners should seize them for unpaid storage fee’s. That has happened in my state. Putting your property on someone elses property is considered a tacit admission of a debt when it comes to storage. Ironically there is another law that states you can’t charge for more than six months storage without a signed agreement. However there is nothing regulating how much that fee is. Case in point a person failed to pick up late model car at a towing company for two years. The towing company gave the owner a huge bill and they went to court to get it reduced to six months. The towing company just resubmitted a bill for six months at a increased rate that equaled the amount of the original bill. By the time the asshole who should have come and got their car sooner got through the bill had went up again. It was quite entertaining. to watch.

  • HowAbt2day@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Aren’t these atrocities full of nice lithium batteries? If so, confiscated cars can be scraped for parts with the batteries going to hospitals, schools, the ACAB offices and fire departments to be used as backup electricity.

  • Johnnykorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    But using the land for vehicle storage is against city code.

    You can park your car in the parking lot, but not that car…

    And dealers do not randomly park cars in parking lots without permission otherwise they would have been towed. The lot owner is getting paid.

  • Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    God the environmental damage caused by making all these batteries, only to be used in a cyber truck and dumped in a car park.

    Remember when Elon was pretending to be saving the environment, well now he isn’t.

    • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      EVs were never about saving the environment. It does so much damage making a new EV. If companies wanted to save the environment they would have invested in refurbishing and updating older used cars.

      EDIT: Sad how many ignorant people are down voting this without even attempting to look up the environmental cost of making a brand new car loading with rare earth minerals. While destroying a slightly older car that’s already been built and whose environmental impact has already been dealt with and would best be put to use rather than sit in a junk yard for 50 years.

      Too many corporate boot lickers believing the car companies based on nothing more than “Green” buzz words.

      • innermachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        The most environmentally friendly thing you can do as a car owner is just keep the oldest car u have alive as long as possible. Cash for lunkers wasn’t about getting people in cleaner cars, it was about subsidizing companies so they could sell more while destroying perfectly good vehicles. This shredded the used car market and we are paying for it now. Literally. If you need to get a new car anyways, sure an ev or hybrid might be the way. But keeping a stinky old diesel running, while it may seem counterintuitive, is the cleaner thing to do. What we wmit driving pails in comparison to the production pollution associated with all these throw away cars.

        • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          The most environmentally friendly thing you can do as a car owner is stop being one. Ride a bike. Take Mass Transit. Walk.

          • innermachine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Spoken like a true pedestrian. I live in one of the bigger “cities” in my state and it’s smaller than a “small town” in the last state I lived in, not having a car here is impossible. The most environmentally friendly thing to do would be abandon all technology and eat berries in a cave and die at 30 because of poor hygiene, your comment is irrelevant to the conversation at hand.

            • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Don’t worry about it. You’ll be dead from a multiple simultaneous crises. Your car won’t save you.

              We in the “rich” world already have a housing crisis where masses would love a cave over their current sleeping rough. Berries would be nice too and hunger is all too well known in the developed world.

              You are way out of touch. Congratulations to be so fortunate.

          • RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            That’s a great idea unless you are rural. City folks can do these things far easier than people that the nearest store is 10 miles away.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 days ago

    Well if they’re just abandoning them, then the city should seize them and start selling them for parts. I know most of it is garbage but surely parts of it can go to something more useful.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      The article didn’t do their research but certainly implies it’s the landlord making a quick buck on storage fees why waiting for redevelopment to start

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t think lithium fires can be extinguished. I thought dumping sand on them might be a solution but a commenter mentioned that the fire is self oxidizing and basically you just have to wait for it to end, while maybe cooking it with water a bit as it burns.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Some of those trucks ended up stored at a run-down mall in Farmington Hills outside of Detroit in Michigan. Unsurprisingly, local officials are not happy about it.

    Lol, he’s not even trying to hide them anymore. I would like to see pics of these trucks *from afar at the rundown mall. It sounds very dystopian to see, Mad Max like.

    Edit: The pics they show don’t show the mall in the background and how empty it looks.

  • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Someone call a bomb squad. There are a bunch of terrorist bombs disguised as tesla cars in parking lots. I heard it’s complicated to defuse, so I think we should just conduct a controlled detonation on these obvious terrorist cars. 😏

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 days ago

    Tesla’s Cybertruck is a big silver sales flop and that’s given the company several problems, including working out what to do with all the electric pickups it can’t sell.

    Yes. That’s how you start a swastidumpster article.

  • Bieren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The city should just confiscate all of them. I mean, at this point they are abandoned on city property.

  • Jikiya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Did he park them in a lot away from cameras, hoping there would be some “demonstrations” that would then allow him to claim insurance money? Does the policy cover “domestic terrorism”?