• undrwater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    “After reaching out to Meta about why the promo campaign had been stomped out, the company replied that “any mention of civil rights, feminism or social reform are usually classified as ‘social topics’ by our automatic system,” and therefore rejected.”

    Wow.

    • redditStinksSuperBad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      not that i’m a meta fan, I fucking hate that company, but this swings both ways. Imagine your local coffee shop is boosting posts about traditional marriage and pro-life themes. They get blocked as well.

      • undrwater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s no way to get around “any mention of civil rights” though. That covers all humans.

      • madeofpendletonwool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I just don’t go to that coffee shop. Problem solved. They can say whatever they want. If I don’t support it I don’t go. I don’t see how the coffee shop argument hold up. And if enough people hold the same views they close.

        Meta however is too big to fail. Which gives them a free pass to pass their cancerous views onto society while knowing no matter how much the general public hates them and their shitty views they will continue to use the platform because their friends and family still use it. Enshittification. If my coffee shop enshittifies I tell them to pound sand.

      • undrwater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Maybe. This was an advertisement for a book that had those themes.

        Personally, I don’t want either to be excluded.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    I see incredibly violent and bigoted content all the time on Meta platforms and always report it. Rarely does anything get taken down. But feminism bad I suppose.

      • obvs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I stopped using Facebook years ago.

        Before there were viable alternatives.

        The idea that you need Facebook because there aren’t significant alternatives is just not true.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        No alternative is viable if no one uses it.

        The network effect is real, and it’s what lets these fascism pushers stay top of mind at all times.

      • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Let’s have tacos tonight.” “Nah Im not feeling tacos.” “OK let’s get Chinese food.” “Nah i don’t want Chinese food.” "…ok… let’s make soup. " “Nah I don’t want soup tonight.”

        • undrwater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          This made me thoughtful and laugh at the same time, thank you.

          You’re right, of course. People prefer centralized platforms, and we “nerds” prefer decentralized ones.

          There are no alternatives.

      • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Facebook to Friendica

        Twitter/Threads to Mastodon/Euclavd

        Instagram to Pixelfed/Vernissage

        Tiktok to Loops

        YouTube to PeerTube

        Anything else?

        Edit:

        Whatsapp to Signal/Delta Chat/Cwtch/Briar

        Reddit to Lemmy/Piefed/Pylova

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The viable alternative is nothing.

        Because no one gives a shit about you (general you, not specific at BitsAndBites), or about what you say. You use it cause you’re addicted to performing for people you dont even talk to or like, because no one can actually maintain hundreds, if not thousands of connections like you collect on facebook, most of whom don’t even give a shit about you. its just a mutual masturbation session, only instead of jerking each others dicks off, your jerking eachother off with pointless likes.

        All social media is, is a means of generating profit from mental illness, and manufacturing mental illness for profit.

    • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      the problem is people are so addicted to it, at least in my province. They don’t want to hear about any alternative that would require the smallest effort. In the 80’s, Dead Kennedys made an album called “Give me convenience or give me death”. I took me decades to realize how accurate this title was for depicting the world we live in.

    • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      And also Instagram and whatever other Zuck products are in your life. I’m happy they wasted so many billions of dollars setting of virtual Mii meetings lmao…

  • ksigley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lol. Feminism should be the standard. Everything else is simply sexism.

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is the problem with social media. Outrage drives clicks, so “feminism” is portrayed as a caricature of brightly died hair, “ugly” women, feeble men, and the stereotype of unemployed art students.

      It’s exactly what we were warned about in books like 1984 and animal farm. The media controls thoughts, who controls the media?

  • velma@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The production in question is an adaptation of “A Room of One’s Own,” a book by the legendary English author and feminist Virginia Woolf. According to the Teatre Raval, planned promotional posts about the show were blocked on both Instagram and Facebook, likely by an automated content moderation system.

    After reaching out to Meta about why the promo campaign had been stomped out, the company replied that “any mention of civil rights, feminism or social reform are usually classified as ‘social topics’ by our automatic system,” and therefore rejected.

    According to the Guardian, the company then cryptically recommended the Raval remove “key words” related to social activism, so the promo campaign can pass the automated censor — though the company failed to explain what, exactly, its content system objected to.

    ”We don’t know if the publicity has been rejected because of the name of Virginia Woolf or because of the word feminism, or both,” Clara Sanchis, who stars in the one-woman show told the Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia, per the Guardian, which translated the comments.

    “In any case, it’s a way of erasing from the map advances that have taken centuries to achieve,” Sanchis continued. “We have given social media unlimited power and every day we can see how dangerous this is. It’s bias and manipulation.”

    It’s not going to stop at Meta just like it did not stop at Roe v Wade being overturned.

    I’m sick of men telling me that I’m overreacting about these issues.

      • velma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Absolutely. It’s not just the censorship though - it’s the attack on women’s rights that I’m referencing.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m sick of men telling me that I’m overreacting about these issues.

      The ones telling you that you’re over reacting are the ones who have a vested interest in your downfall

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yepppp, where meta goes rightwards other social media sites follow. And many of them are run by misogynists

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The United States and its most powerful corporations now fully and openly embrace fascism. Revolution is our only hope now, there is no one coming to save us but ourselves. Join your local socialist group and start training now. Don’t wait for the mass arrests to begin.

  • pixiribbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    facebook has become such a sinister platform. i’ve witnessed several members of my family become radicalized by their algorithms pushing conspiratorial rhetoric. the worst part? they refuse to use anything else. there’s just something about facebook that has them convinced it’s reputable.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    3 days ago

    Meta wants to be the global town square, but apparently Virginia Woolf and feminism are too dangerous for its ad system. Meanwhile the company keeps asking us to trust its algorithms with billions of people’s speech. If Meta can’t distinguish feminist literature from prohibited content, maybe it shouldn’t be the internet’s self appointed censor.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      If Meta can’t distinguish feminist literature from prohibited content,

      You misunderstand… Feminist literature is the prohibited content. I’m not making a joke here. That’s literally their policy!

  • ruplicant@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    what the actual fuck. almost every week I hear about Meta failing to remove scams, child porn or hateful shit from their platforms, and now this…?

    enormous amounts of people are hanging in a Nazi bar everyday but they’re just too comfortably addicted to do otherwise. it’s sick

  • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So would promoting a play about how great capitalism is get filtered out I wonder?

    I’m fortunate to be of the age where I’ve grown out of Facebook so never bothered to setup Instagram.

    Moving on from WhatsApp is hard though 😡

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nobody needs meta. Just stop using any of their products.

    I can’t think of the last time I used Facebook or anything related to it, my life is better for it.

    Just leave them behind.

  • Techno-rat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Lol, lmao even. What about all the russian bots spewing political propaganda 24/7, just to name one of the millions of glaring examples?

    Obvious to anyone with two braincells to rub together that this is further capiulation to the american fascist pants-shitter in chief. And money. Same thing anyways.

    When do we put zuckyberg through the hague?