Father, Hacker (Information Security Professional), Open Source Software Developer, Inventor, and 3D printing enthusiast

  • 1 Post
  • 128 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2023

help-circle








  • Conservatives love the concept that private charities should be the ones who provide, “hand outs” (e.g. free food) and things like health care to those who can’t afford it. Except they always conveniently neglect the fact that all the charities in the world combined are but a fraction of a percent of government spending on similar things.

    Furthermore, charities cannot hope to match the efficiency of governments providing the same services. Even the most inefficient government agencies have overhead far lower than the best-run charities.

    Governments don’t have to solicit for donations. They aren’t beholden to the market or bad economic times. They can pool bureaucratic resources across multiple programs and take advantage of economies of scale that the biggest charities could only dream of.

    The truth is that if you actually want to help the most desperate people of the world, government programs are the most efficient and effective way to do so.




  • Not a bad law if applied to companies and public figures. Complete wishful thinking if applied to individuals.

    For companies it’s actually enforceable but for individuals it’s basically impossible and even if you do catch someone uploading AI-generated stuff: Who cares. It’s the intent that matters when it comes to individuals.

    Were they trying to besmirch someone’s reputation by uploading false images of that person in compromising situations? That’s clear bad intent.

    Were they trying to incite a riot or intentionally spreading disinformation? Again, clear bad intent.

    Were they showing off something cool they made with AI generation? It is of no consequence and should be treated as such.