My three kids are in their 20’s. Assuming there are no weapons involved, I’d say they’re safe with any of them.
Bin Laden, Hitler, and Combs would each have a rough night. Lindsay would probably be ok. If necessary, they could restrain her without injuring her.
I don’t know who top left is, but I reckon Bin Laden’s the safe bet here
Hwo is on top left and bottom right?
Just leave them home alone.
Alternatively, you reckon Osama could teach them basic engineering skills? If they are making phone-activated landmines surely they can put up some fun RF experiments.
I know for a fact Bin Laden had games and the movie Cars on his computer. Safest bet.
That’s an easy choice. Bin Laden wasn’t even that bad of a guy.
We’re not actually reposting incel memes on Lemmy, are we?
Osama bin Laden loved his kids. He was hard on them, for sure, he was basically what you imagine when you think of a deep south US prepper survivalist - a bit eccentric and paranoid, but intelligent - he would be taking his kids on long hikes, teaching them how to sleep in the desert with only sand as a blanket, but he did it out of a deep desire to protect them and give them skills to survive.
deep south US prepper survivalist
intelligent
sorry, you lost me there
If they have blonde hair and blue eyes, uncle Adolf is the safest bet.
Did Hitler actually do any killing people himself, or did he just have other people do it for him? If it’s the latter then I pick him, because I think he’s too lazy to actually do anything.
Tbh, I don’t know who the lady is
I think that’s the lady currently on trial for murdering her three kids.
Now I know, and
trial is over. she will likely have another trial. we won’t know until end of Sept when the next hearing for her case is set.
it’s possible a plea deal could be offered, but unlikely.
‘we have had the trial, yes. but what about the second one?’
I’ll check back in a few hours, I have a feeling this’ll be a dumpster fire.
Surprisingly it’s not that bad. Proud of the lemmings
Well I’m not jewish…so…
Are you ‘arian’? Cause if not, I’ve got bad news for you
Bin laden it is then, at least he can teach my kid life skills like flying and chemistry
Yeah, I think he’s the only choice for a kid tbh. Even he had standards and his beef was with the us gov not with kids
Easy choice, Diddy is the only one I can realistically sue afterwards. If I’m throwing my kid to the wolves, I might but as well get paid for it.
We have different definitons of “easy” choice.
If I’m throwing my kid to the wolves, I might but as well get paid for it.
I would choose any of these guys over you
People murder their children every 5 days in America. That means that 265 people have wiped out their families since Casey killed her kids. In almost all cases, the father is the perpetrator. Do you know the names, or faces of any of those hundreds of men?
Casey killed her kids because she was nuts. Not even the prosecution disputes this.
People hate her because misogyny and ableism. If she was a man and did it for insurance money, this would barely make the local news.
She was able to control and strangle her three children to death. I feel bad because there’s a documented path of attempting to seek mental heath.
Let’s be real if this wasn’t a white woman it would likely be a max sentence verdict. This was a horrific crime, the type of shit that gets minors charged as adults.
(Insert gender war here)
People hate her because misogyny and ableism.
I kind of disagree
It’s become a huge story because of the support and empathy that she’s getting, while the other cases of infanticide don’t receive attention or support (and rightfully so).
Still doesn’t make the choice for babysitter any easier
it’s a huge case because it’s a proxy for the gender war and extremists on both sides have trumpted it as loud as they possibly can. like the bozos here pushing false claims about the evidence.
most normal folks think she’s nuts and should be jailed like anyone else who kills her kids.
the insane people think she should be set free and isn’t guilty, even though she confessed and all the evidence is clear she did the crime. and many of them claim it was the dad that did it because only men can be evil, and if she did do it, he forced her to do it with psychic powers.
the subtle of court case, whether she is criminally liable for her actions, is completely lost the vast majority of folks, especially the insane people.
- Woman is charged for killing her three kids.
- Evidence is real shabby.
- Regardless, she was clearly out of her mind.
- Loads of people hop on the case as an example of a person that should not be punished due to their mental state.
- The case gains loads of media attention.
- “This is misogyny.”
When the crime is strictly a parent killing their children its about 50/50 this is called filicide. You’re conflating family annihilation with filicide. Your source supports my claim not yours. There have been more than double instances of filicide vs familicide in the same span. I don’t know the names of any of the men or women. Again women being around half that number. You are talking about a different crime. Especially considering those are almost always very open and shut whereas this has lots of strange intricacies. The prosecution absolutely disputes she is/was insane at the time of the crime. That’s literally the entire case. They even brought medical professionals involved her treatment to dispute the fact she was insane. Are you sure your angle isn’t rooted in misandry? That last claim I made has the exact same amount of merit your claims about ableism and misogyny do. Which is very little. I believe she should be in a psychiatric hospital for the rest of her life, not general prison. The false narrative that she is either going to be found innocent or guilty is what’s mudding the waters. She’s either going to prison or a hospital upon retrial, period. This is in the news in part because it distracts from Trump raping kids and the general shit show happening. As well as the fact its just an interesting case with a ton of layers.
