• DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    Is that why they all feel the same and suck equally?

    OKCupid used to be great. Felt different. Less corporate I guess. Easier to talk to people. Was shit the last time I checked a handful of years ago.

    Fun Fact: OKCupid used to be SparkNotes, which used to be a CliffNotes type site. Then they started doing user generated quizes. Which X-Men would you be? Then it was randomly a dating site one day.

  • ironpangolin29@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I wonder if you will find real people, real connections if you create a profile that contradicts what you are looking for.

    You want an outdoorsy, travelling, generally adventurous personality to travel the world with. If you ask for that, they’re going to match you with introverted hermits.

    Ask for hermit homebodies. You’ll find your Ellie.

    Consider the chance that they built an algorithm that matches you with failures to keep you coming back to the platform.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 hours ago

    the best way to avoid monopoly charges, is to create multiple companies that “compete” with eachother, that you own.

    Luxotica learned this a long time ago, which is why they profit on almost any pair of glasses you buy, and why no one things its a monopoly

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s just a big game of Monopoly except they’re allowed to trick us into thinking they haven’t dominated the board yet. What a joke.

    • UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 hours ago

      And they have made the apps intentionaly worse, because a successful dating app deletes its users.

      • Flagstaff@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The proof lies in them not bothering to ask, “Why did you reject this person?” If they actually took note, they would zero in on your type immediately and send you only people of that type and you’d match within weeks. They don’t want that lol. They want you to hang around…

      • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah it’s one of those cases where basic material interest ought to cast suspicion on the apps in my view.

  • frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Makes perfect sense! How many companies would you expect to own all the popular dating sites? 5? 10?

    Of course not! There should only be one company controlling entire markets, it’s the American way 🤡

  • Delilah@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Here are all the sites the match group owns. All of the ‘* people meet’ sites are making me laugh.

    Archer Asian People Meet Babyboomer People Meet BB People Meet Black Christian People Meet Black People Meet Black Professional People Meet BLK Catholic People Meet Chinese People Meet Chispa Delightful Democratic People Meet Divorced People Meet Genxpeoplemeet Her Hinge Indiamatch Interracial People Meet Italian People Meet J People Meet Latino People Meet Ldsplanet Little People Meet Loveandseek Marriage Minded People Meet Match.com Match Japan OkCupid Ourtime Pairs People Meet Pet People Meet Plenty of Fish Republican People Meet Salams Seniorblack People Meet Single People Meet Sniffies (minority stake)[63][64] Stir The League Tinder Upward Yuzu

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      21 hours ago

      If you want each entry to appear on a new line, you need to put two spaces at the end of each line.

      Line 1
      Line 2

      If you want a paragraph break, use two newlines

      Paragraph 1

      Paragraph 2

      • Trex202@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Archer

        Asian People Meet

        Babyboomer People Meet

        BB People Meet

        Black Christian People Meet

        Black People Meet

        Black Professional People Meet

        BLK

        Catholic People Meet

        Chinese People Meet

        Chispa

        Delightful

        Democratic People Meet

        Divorced People Meet

        Genxpeoplemeet

        Her

        Hinge

        Indiamatch

        Interracial People Meet

        Italian People Meet

        J People Meet

        Latino People Meet

        Ldsplanet

        Little People Meet

        Loveandseek

        Marriage Minded People Meet

        Match.com

        Match Japan

        OkCupid

        Ourtime

        Pairs

        People Meet

        Pet People Meet

        Plenty of Fish

        Republican People Meet

        Salams

        Seniorblack People Meet

        Single People Meet

        Sniffies (minority stake)[63][64]

        Stir

        The League

        Tinder

        Upward

        Yuzu

  • Semester3383@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    And the best part? Matching algorithms don’t do shit. You can’t actually predict attraction and interest based on matching character traits.

  • blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Hot take: match group is actually doing a pretty damn good job of trying to get you a date. The constant changing fashions of dating sites indicates that the company’s sites don’t have a stranglehold on the market like, say, facebook does. They have significant competitors in the form of Bumble, Grindr, Feeld, Badoo, etc. People on site like Lemmy often concoct conspiracies about how the sites are somehow nefariously keeping your soulmate from you.

    But they arent. Dating sites arent difficult because the companies are evil (sure, they are evil, but thats not why dating sites are difficult). They are difficult because people are difficult.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Nah, match group has been using fake accounts to lure mostly men into their sites for decades. Make a free account, get a message within 30 minutes, pay 5 bucks to read it.

      Last time I used tinder, in early 2023, the app was actively hiding any of the “49+” profiles that had swiped right on me. I’d get, at best, 1 match a week. I mean, 300 (yes, I counted) swipes left and not a single “you missed a match”?? They probably had fingerprinted my device and knew I was a returning user, even if I was on a different phone number, so I was a better target for them to sell their subscriptions. Either that or the algo caught how I was just going left without a thought and kept showing all their fakes and bots.

      hell, tinder is so awful that the vast majority of brazilian users there just leave their instagram handle on their profile, with a few also asking to “only message if we match”

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        If your complaint is “this business won’t give me their services for free”, then that’s not a real complaint. They’re a business, and businesses exist to make money. Last I checked, the price of a hinge subscription for a month was about $30. You could easily spend that much on a few drinks in a night at a trendy bar.

        Is tinder full of bots? Yes. But also, tinder is something of a sinking ship, and the bots keep their numbers inflated while not fighting thr flood saves on expenses. I’ve had much better luck on Hinge.

    • Flagstaff@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      If they did an actually good job, they would ask every person after every single swipe, “Why did you reject/accept this person?” and zero in on your type instantly. They’d use that data to immediately, strictly filter for such people and you’d be off in a month, tops. I don’t know how many times I have to repeat it: they do not care about you matching.

      With that said, people being difficult and guarded and full of expectations sure don’t help, either, yeah.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That is an awesome idea for a dating site. You should make it, and when it starts finding people their soulmates within a month, it will quickly become the most profitable app in the world and you’ll make oodles of money.

        Or else you’ll figure out some flaw in your plan, and it will end up about as good at finding people matches as showing them a random assortment of people on the site.