Ukraine said it took a Russian position using just drones and ground robots.

Zelenskyy said it was a wartime first, and no Ukrainian infantry was involved.

He said robots have done over 22,000 missions in three months, keeping many soldiers from harm.

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well, the future looks bright enough. We may work to death in captailist states, but at least robots will fight each other, so no need for soldiers.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Yeah… I really don’t like the changes that the Russian Invasion of Ukraine are making to war.

      Cheap Kamikaze drones, unmanned roving gun turrets, etc etc… Removing men on the ground feels like its gonna make it easier to pursue and lust for wars as these technologies continue to advance further and remove the human components.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    As always, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

    things are going to get really weird

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    So… we got two ways to go. One the robot on robot wars end up wiping us all out by exhausting all or resources and of course killing civilians. Or we take to space and have the robot wars stay on earth. Mars at least I figure. For a few at least.

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Possible. It does seem like drones fighting drones should mean less human casualties, which has both a humanitarian side and an escalation risk side.

      Then again a lot of people have thought their weapons would make war less deadly, and been very wrong, including the case of WWI-era artillery.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        They “accidentally” told the drones/robots to attack the schools and hospitals. “We would never do that on purpose”

        “Well why were the terrorists using school children as human shields!”

        I doubt it will ever stop

        • festus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          This, but also if you aren’t putting your soldiers at risk then war becomes more palatable (and thus more likely). For example, I doubt Trump would have attacked Iran if he had been quoted 1000+ American causalties in the first week.

    • juanito_the_great@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I really, honestly hope you are right. Sadly, I think you are wrong. I’ve recently been exposed to the concepts of “human safari” and “drone siege” and they aren’t pretty. “Drone on drone” might be just the preamble of these.

      • slaeg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        No preamble, unfortunately. The Russians are doing these “human safaris”, which are, of course, clear as day war crimes, to train their drone pilots.

        Also to terrorize and wear out the civilian population of course, which is the Russian way of war.

        AI drones are coming along, but these won’t only be used on other drones or robots, that much we can know already.

        • juanito_the_great@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Indeed, I meant that in a hypothetical “drone vs drone” war, after the drones win the attacks on civilians and sieges will most likely come after.

      • minorkeys@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I do not mean it will be tolerable to be near. I mean citizens of nations who choose war will tolerate it more if their own soldiers are not dying in war. If war requires less people and more “stuff” to wage, citizens will feel less motivation to speak out against it. It will make waging war more of an option not less of one, if only equipment is being lost.

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      How long until inter-country conflicts are settled by robot battles and we’re basically living the plot of Robo Jox?

  • Tolc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    crazy stuff, now twinks will win wars not 7 feet chuds