• BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Does jellyfin have an easy way for remote streaming? I have a couple dozen people on my Plex server, most not very tech savvy, so setting up tailscale and running remote that way isn’t an option. I have a Plex pass so I haven’t been screwed by Plex yet, so I’m not rushing to get out, but I could see myself running both.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes-ish, it’s harder for you than the users. But you will have to secure a URL and they will have to remember that URL. Also there’s some security issues with some unsecured endpoints on Jellyfin. That said I have mine out there exposed to the net and am comfortable enough with it.

        • Gonzako@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I have mine behind a caddy reverse proxy that forces https. I think that handles most sniffing concerns

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Bummer… unfortunately, that’s a deal breaker for me to completely drop Plex. Maybe someday.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          So I don’t get it, I have mine up with a domain without tsilscale… The clients are quite happy wherever. I don’t even see that much “crawling” traffic that goes to the domain, most just hit the server by ip and get a static 401 page that the “default” site is hard coded to give out.

      • oakey66@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I moved away from plex as well. I do have remote access but had to set up Tailscale on the accounts that access it. It’s a bit of a hassle initially but works well.

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I set mine up with HAProxy for TLS offloading and ACME for the server cert. Restrict your access to just your country/region by GeoIP and you are pretty good to go.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d love Jellyfin if not for their incredibly infuriating seek behaviour. Why do I have to press play to start the video again?

      • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        In case this helps, for me when I use it on Android TV with said TV’s remote, the arrow buttons on the direction pad for anything require pressing play/OK button after. But if I use the fast forward buttons, it does seek and then just keeps playing.

      • binarytobis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        For me I just want a fast forward button. They have something they call fast forward, but it seeks instead.

    • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Agreed! I stayed with Plex for a long time because Jellyfin had a rough time with live TV (antenna) and I already had a PlexPass because of a sale a long time ago. Now Plex is only still running because I love Plexamp.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Playing devil’s advocate, I understand one point of pressure: Plex doesn’t want to be perceived as a “piracy app.”

    See: Kodi. https://kodi.expert/kodi-news/mpaa-warns-increasing-kodi-abuse-poses-greater-video-piracy-risk/

    To be blunt, that’s a huge chunk of their userbase. And they run the risk of being legally pounded to dust once that image takes hold.

    So how do they avoid that? Add a bunch of other stuff, for plausible deniability. And it seems to have worked, as the anti-piracy gods haven’t singled them out like they have past software projects.


    To be clear, I’m not excusing Plex. But I can sympathize.

  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The writing was on the wall when they started getting American VC money.

    American VC culture is anthenema to truly user focused products.

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If jellyfin was easier to use and had the same options as Plex, id switch over. But I’ll keep my Plex lifetime pass as long as I can until they make all lifetime passes null in the next 2 years and make us all pay monthly.

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m going to call it like I saw it, a very long time ago.

    <rant>

    You have a product that is basically purpose built to make data hoarding and piracy practical, yet it requires a login with a central service. I don’t care what justification anyone thinks makes that worthwhile or even a good compromise. Signaling to any corporate entity that you’re in possession of such a thing is a bad idea to begin with. They shouldn’t even know you exist. That information, along with anything else you do with the product is compromising to you and can be sold for money if aggregated with everyone else’s data.

    If you find this rant out of place in our modern world, I’d like to point to the concept of shifting baselines. This didn’t used to be normal and nothing short of greed continues the behavior. The technology before this ran/runs without anyone knowing. Consider VLC, or XBMC.

  • barcaxavi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not for me. Before Plex I was browsing folders on my TV and I actually had to organize everything, plus find and download matching subtitles. It sucked so much.

    I got into self hosting because of Plex and ran it on a 2015 Shield (both the server and the player) for ~8 years. Just moved the server to another machine this year. Still happy premium user.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I hate headlines like this. I’d love to hear the REASONS WHY Plex are doing all of this. But no, it’s just “4 ways in which Plex now sucks” which we all know already.

    Before someone says “the reason is money” we need to ask: do the developers of Jellyfin not use money? Why won’t the same thing just happen to them too?

    Before someone says “enshittification,” we need to ask: does this mean Jellyfin will soon have the same problems?

    We all seem to love Jellyfin so I think we need to understand the actual reason why, or this will just continue happening.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hate headlines like this. I’d love to hear the REASONS WHY Plex are doing all of this.

      1. Greed… do you really need 3 more?

      Before someone says “the reason is money” we need to ask: do the developers of Jellyfin not use money? Why won’t the same thing just happen to them too?

      Plex is a private company wanting money… Jellyfin is a voluteer-drive effort

      Before someone says “enshittification,” we need to ask: does this mean Jellyfin will soon have the same problems?

      Enshitification happens to privately develop products due to <checks notes> greed… Jellyfin is not a private company pushing a product for profit

      We all seem to love Jellyfin so I think we need to understand the actual reason why, or this will just continue happening.

      Back to “greed”

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        As predicted, a one-dimensional answer.

        Let’s say they want more money: they do have a healthy software subscriptions business. How can they get more by becoming the world’s tiniest streaming service? And won’t that cannibalize their subscriptions business as the experience gets shittier and shittier?

        Some actual “whys” within this would be things like (made up, but for example)

        1. the subscriptions business is dying - less than 1% of users ever buy a pass and efforts to increase that failed for (another reason here)

        2. streaming services are dumping cash into viewer acquisition because a war is on for dominance in that space and Pled is capitalizing on that

        3. Plex has high overlap with gamers and are making good money on midroll gaming ads during these streams

        4. Plex has legal concerns about facilitating piracy - this is the real reason why sync is shit and they killed watch together. They are desperately trying to pivot out of their old business before they get sued - OR all this streaming nonsense gives them a kind of fig leaf over that somehow

        See, issues can be complex and interesting. Just calling them greedy is neither. How is this the greedy play, even?

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Nobody outside Plex’s finance department is going to have what you’re looking for if those examples are anything to go by.

          What it comes down to is they have $130M that investors are going to want back and all the decisions they’re making now are aimed at doing so. That doesn’t mean any of those decisions are good or are going to work. It didn’t even mean they won’t backfire and have the opposite effect.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Anyone who has knowledge of or works in any areas adjacent to any of these could provide some kind of insight. Fuck me for wanting some grownup conversation about why businesses do the things they do, instead of a circle jerk of hating on mustache-twirling villains.

  • Doorknob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    If they were going to get enshittified, they should’ve been smarter about it to gradually introduce lock-in. The switching cost of going to Jellyfin is almost zero. Did it in an afternoon about a year ago. Ya done goofed, Plex

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Goodness, how am I supposed to store and stream more entertainment than I could watch in a lifetime now?