• snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    6 months ago

    Paraphrasing:

    “We only have the driver’s word they were in self driving mode…”

    “This isn’t the first time a Tesla has driven onto train tracks…”

    Since it isn’t the first time I’m gonna go ahead and believe the driver, thanks.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      6 months ago

      Furthermore, with the amount of telemetry that those cars have The company knows whether it was in self drive or not when it went onto the track. So the fact that they didn’t go public saying it wasn’t means that it was in self-drive mode and they want to save the PR face and liability.

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        6 months ago

        I have a nephew that worked at Tesla as a software engineer for a couple years (he left about a year ago). I gave him the VIN to my Tesla and the amount of data he shared with me was crazy. He warned me that one of my brake lights was regularly logging errors. If their telemetry includes that sort of information then clearly they are logging a LOT of data.

          • Pika@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            6 months ago

            Dude, in today’s world we’re lucky if they stop at the manufacturer. I know of a few insurances that have contracts through major dealers and they just automatically get the data that’s registered via the cars systems. That way they can make better decisions regarding people’s car insurance.

            Nowadays it’s a red flag if you join a car insurance and they don’t offer to give you a discount if you put something like drive pass on which logs you’re driving because it probably means that your car is already getting that data to them.

            • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              We just got back from a road trip in a friend’s '25 Tundra and it popped up a TPMS warning for a faulty sensor then minutes later he got a text from the dealership telling him about it and to bring it in for service.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Since the story has 3 separate incidents where “the driver let their Tesla turn left onto some railroad tracks” I’m going to posit:

      Teslas on self-drive mode will turn left onto railroad tracks unless forcibly restrained.

      Prove me wrong, Tesla

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Map data obtained and converted from other formats often ends up accidentally condensing labeling categories. One result is train tracks being categorized as generic roads instead of retaining their specific sub-heading. Another, unrelated to this, but common for people that play geo games is when forests and water areas end up being tagged as the wrong specific types.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Aha. But that sounds correctable… So not having any people assigned to checking on railroads and making sure the system recognizes them as railroads would be due to miserliness on the part of Tesla then… And might also say something about why some Teslas have been known to drive into bodies of water (or children, but that’s probably a different instance of miserliness)

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean …… Tesla self driving allegedly did this three times in three years but we don’t yet have public data to verify that’s what happened nor do we in any way compare it to what human drivers do.

        Although one of the many ways I think I’m an above average driver (just like everyone else) is that people do a lot of stupid things at railroad crossings and I never would

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m pretty sure Tesla self-drive does a lot of stupid things you never would, too. That’s why they want you at the wheel, paying attention and ready to correct it in an instant! (Which defeats the whole benefit of self-drive mode imho, but whatever)

          The fact that they can avoid all responsibilities and blame you for their errors is of course the other reason.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      The ~2010 runaway Toyota hysteria was ultimately blamed on mechanical problems less than half the time. Floor mats jamming the pedal, drivers mixing up gas/brake pedals in panic, downright lying to evade a speeding ticket, etc were cause for many cases.

      Should a manufacturer be held accountable for legitimate flaws? Absolutely. Should drivers be absolved without the facts just because we don’t like a company? I don’t think so. But if Tesla has proof fsd was off, we’ll know in a minute when they invade the driver’s privacy and release driving events

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Tesla has constantly lied about their FSD for a decade. We don’t trust them because they are untrustworthy, not because we don’t like them.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          They promote it in ways that people sometimes trust it too much …. But in particular when releasing telemetry I do t remember tha ever being an accusation

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s more about when they don’t release it/only selectively say things that make them look good and staying silent when they look bad.

    • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Maybe I’m missing something, but isn’t it trivial to take it out of their bullshit dangerous “FSD” mode and take control? How does a car go approximately 40-50 feet down the tracks without the driver noticing and stopping it?

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        On some railroad crossings you might only need to go off the crossing to get stuck in the tracks and unable to back out. Trying to get out is another 30-40 feet.

        Being caught off guard when the car isn’t supposed to do that is how to get stuck in the first place. Yeah, terrible driver trusting shit technology.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      The thing that strikes me about both this story and the thing you posted is that the people in the Tesla seem to be like “this is fine” as the car does some pretty terrible stuff.

      In that one, Tesla failing to honor a forced left turn instead opting to go straight into oncoming lanes and waggle about causing things to honk at them, the human just sits there without trying to intervene. Meanwhile they describe it as “navigation issue/hesitation” which really understates what happened there.

      The train one didn’t come with video, but I can’t imagine just letting my car turn itself onto tracks and going 40 feet without thinking.

      My Ford even thinks about going too close to another lane and I’m intervening even if it was really going to be no big deal. I can’t imagine this level of “oh well”.

      Tesla drivers/riders are really nuts…

  • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    If only there was a way to avoid the place where trains drive.

    I checked first. They didn’t make a turn into a crossing. It turned onto the tracks. Jalopnik says there’s no official statement that it was actually driving under FSD(elusion) but if it was strictly under human driving (or FSD turned itself off after driving off) I guarantee Tesla will invade privacy and slander the driver by next day for the sake of court of public opinion

    • egrets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      They didn’t make a turn into a crossing. It turned onto the tracks.

      Just to be clear for others, it did so at a crossing. That’s still obviously not what it should have done and it’s no defence of the self-driving feature, but I read your comment as suggesting it had found its way onto train tracks by some other route.

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Thanks. I could have clarified better myself. I meant “didn’t turn from a rail-parallel road onto a crossing to be met by a train it couldn’t reasonably detect due to bad road design”

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Tesla’s self-driving is pretty shite but they seem to have a particular problem with railway crossings, as also pointed out in the article. Of all of the obstacles for the self-driving system to fail to detect, the several thousand tons of moving steel is probably one of the worst outcomes.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Maybe if they use LIDAR like they should have instead of just cameras it wouldn’t be such an issue, but they’re determined to minimize costs and maximize profits at the expense of consumers as are all publicly traded companies

  • BeBopALouie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    At this point, if anybody buys one of these vehicles from Tesla, they absolutely deserve what they get. It is absurd.