• Dagamant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 minutes ago

    Here is how it has gone down for a few companies I have visibillity on:

    • Investors with enough stock to have influence demand the company use AI and cut staff
    • remaining ataff struggles to fit AI into their now bloated workload
    • quality slips and stumbles. a few employees are able to make the transition and cause huge AI bills while attempting to cover the workload
    • everyone gets upset and nothing gets done well

    It looks like investors who have also invested in AI are trying to push its use and it is stumbling all over the place. If a company cant adapt it is basically stripped for parts and sold off to companies that are handling it better.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    5 hours ago
    1. Build up reliance on AI, which looks really cheap
    2. You can now replace employees with AI so fire away!
    3. You are now completely dependent on AI and a handful of employees
    4. AI company sees they have you and start jacking up rates. If you could afford paying for people before then you have the $ to pay high rates.
    5. Company now wonders why costs are back to where they were before and the AI isn’t working out as expected.
    • monotremata@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s particularly funny because I’m pretty sure AI companies are still selling the service below cost to try to retain market share (and drive small competitors out of business). They just aren’t taking quite as big a loss on every token with the increased prices.

    • Batmorous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago
      1. They see people have gone to new companies thatre private unionized and value customers/employees/etc replacing them as they had done with their employees
      2. The company asks for them to come back to be laughed at as the people watch for them to slowly sink and be replaced with many better alternatives to take their place
      3. That is happening right now and we all can make it happen faster
  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 hours ago

    And if we had strong labour relationships, we’d make them fucking pay for having attempted to destroy our lives for profit.

  • NM_Gringo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Someone should remind those soggy, arrogant execs that down here in the developer trenches we survived web services, software as a service, outsourcing, and off-shoring. We’re still here after all that and we’ll still be here after AI.

  • Zahille7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I thought billionaires liked giving money to their billionaire friends? What’s the issue?

    /s

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    And the media will keep on shamelessly calling them “job creators”.

    Hopefully some day the average voter will see through that shit.

    • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      4/5 actually, if statistics are anything to go by. The remaining 20% are just slightly above median stupidity, with a vanishingly small sliver actually approaching competent.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    That makes it pretty clear that most executives are the worst possible people to run a company. Well, that’s just how it is when ruthlessness and greed are the only criteria used to select top executives.

    But hey, even if they were to lose their jobs because they’re burning through so much money, things will go on as usual: Anyone who’s ever held a top management position will always be hired for the same role somewhere else, because competence is definitely not the deciding factor here. Never was, never will be.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    At this rate the leopards are going to have to start going on a restricted diet. Maybe the panthers are hungry too though.

    I mean exactly what you think I mean.