• Rusty@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’m still can’t believe some crazy guy 100 years ago convinced the whole country that eating sugar with milk is somehow a healthy breakfast. And the same guy convinced the same country to do the genital mutilation on male infants.

    • sunbytes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Kellogg’s theory was that bland foods that were full of fiber would stop people from masturbating.

      Because he didn’t approve of that kind of icky nonsense.

      So I think the sugar came later.

      I think Graham of Graham crackers was working with a similar concept.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You’re combining the two Kellogg brothers. One thought that pleasure was sin, and that a good diet should be as bland as possible to maintain piety. The other thought his brother’s cereal tasted like shit and was really hard to market and sell, until he added sugar and salt, then subsequently became filthy rich.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Ironically, pre-sugared cereal may have also reduced the amount of sugar in kids’ cereal. For a while, kids were taking regular cereal and dumping sugar on it. Instead of actually parenting and telling them no, the parents started buying sugary cereal.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      And both were done with the goal of reducing masturbation.

      Knowing better has a full day’s worth of content on this, if you’d like to know more