Rebecca Joynes is currently serving a six and a half year prison sentence

A teacher who was convicted for having sex with two boys, becoming pregnant by one, has been banned from the profession.

Maths teacher Rebecca Joynes, 31, was jailed for six and a half years in July last year after being found guilty of six counts of sexual activity with a child, after sleeping with one pupil before falling pregnant by a second while on police bail.

The Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) convened earlier this month via a virtual hearing, which Joynes did not attend, to consider her professional conduct. A panel recommended she be banned from teaching.

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          They define rape as penetration

          Good news is she did seem to actually be punished with a sizable prison sentence (by uk standards)

        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          I dunno. I almost think there should be a different term or word for it. I’m not saying it’s OK at all, I just think bundling so many sexual crimes under one name isn’t great.

          For example; I was a horny teen and probably would have been into a teacher like that. It would have been wrong and it likely would have messed up different aspects of my life. I’m not condoning it or trying to downplaying it, but I feel if I had been violently penetrated against my will by a male teacher the trauma would be a whole different kind.

          So yeah, I don’t know if we should call it rape, but I recognize the boys were underage and taken advantage of, and the crime absolutely deserves to be punished. I’m also the person who get’s all worked up by modern loose usage of terms like WMD and many others, so I know I can be a handful.

          • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            Maybe that young girl wanted to have sex with an older man? Maybe there was no force involved at all?

            NOOOOOO!!! RAPE IS RAPE! SIMPLE AS THAT!

            I get that you want to separate sex by force from sex by free will but when it comes to kids there can never be consent and it defaults to rape. It should not be minimized just because a female teacher raped young boys.

            Edit: If you want a different definition for what happens to someone being forced or not you could call it rape with assault or rape with {whatever}. I don’t think the rape part should be minimized in any way. Just extended in brutality if anything.

            • Lumisal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              I get that you want to separate sex by force from sex by free will but when it comes to kids there can never be consent and it defaults to rape.

              The issue with that definition, legally, is if two 12 year olds have sex with each other, they would now both end up in jail.

              Things like that have happened in the USA btw because the law is set that way.

              The problem isn’t whether they can or can’t consent at that age - humans don’t magically gain some universal phenomena of consent at some arbitrary number.

              It’s the lack of foresight and knowledge of consequences, as well as the physical and mental health risks for young girls who get pregnant. That’s why it’s bad.

              That’s also why the best defense against pedophilia is education about sex. And why the right wing globally usually is against sex education.

              If they know what it is and what it can cause, it’ll be much harder for them to be convinced or tricked by an adult.

              • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                I really don’t get what you are trying to say here.

                So what does the law in the US say now then? That the boy gets thrown in jail?

                Why would you not make exceptions for kids under the age of 15 to have sex with kids under 15 and kids over 15 but under 18 to have sex with kids over 15 but under 18? Granted that they both gave consent.

                In normal countries a kid can not consent to have sex with adults and it would be defined as rape and general sexual education is not frowned upon.

                • Lumisal@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  The US las varies by state, but in some cases only the boy goes to jail. In other both go to jail.

                  Even your proposal of

                  Why would you not make exceptions for kids under the age of 15 to have sex with kids under 15 and kids over 15 but under 18 to have sex with kids over 15 but under 18?

                  Has issues. For example, if two teens were already having sex at 14 but one turns 15, although legal before, it’s suddenly illegal, even if consenting.

                  Same with 17 to 18.

                  That’s why your statement of “underage automatically does not equal consent” doesn’t legally work.

                  What I think would work better than a simple lower limit age ban would be to also include an upper limit age ban as well. I think perhaps of 2 years for 13 and under and 3 years for 14-18.

                  That way, if say a 17 year old has a partner that turns 18 or 19, there’s no issues. But if an adult that’s 22 (or older) does something with a 17 year old it’s illegal.

                  This gives room for consent, because teens are able to consent - they should just be able to do so safely with their peers, rather than because they are targeted by older, more experienced/manipulative adults.

      • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        23 days ago

        Do I look like I give a fuck what the law says? They were underage, ergo could not give consent, ergo it was rape. Also power dynamics teacher pupil makes it even more rapey

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    falling pregnant by a second while on police bail.

    She really can’t stop fucking kids, can she?

    Maybe she has a future in US government

  • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Paedophile teacher who raped two boys is struck off

    Edit: at least six rape apologists didn’t appreciate my headline correction.

    • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      22 days ago

      Well the boys were 15 and 16, past puberty, so it’s not paedophilia. She still belongs behind bars, I’m your friendly neighbourhood language officer.

      • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Well the boys were 15 and 16, past puberty, so it’s not paedophilia. She still belongs behind bars, I’m your friendly neighbourhood language officer.

        Fine.

        She raped minors.

  • Rakonat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    So now the administration just needs to pardon her and make her Secretary of Education. Causes that’s fucking on brand for this shit show.

  • Mihies@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    She is an amateur. She should just say that she didn’t know them and it’s certainly a democrats conspiracy.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      Invoke the Jewish space lasers and it’s all suddenly Hilary’s fault via Hunters laptop. Blatant grift has been going on so long it should just be a class in school now

  • Feedback17@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    Trump wants to lit her in charge of the US Department of Education. PS: If you support Trump, you support child rape.