Ah yes, the notoriously left wing BBC… My eyes are rolling so hard they may fall out of my head.
Compared to American news, yeah. :P
You’re not measuring by what percentage of Trump stories are positive/negative, the only metric that matters to him.
Nutrition Label…? Is that just a cute name for the full details?
Palestinian deaths treated as less newsworthy: Despite Gaza suffering 34x more casualties than Israel, BBC gave Israeli deaths 33 times more coverage per fatality and ran almost equal numbers of humanising victim profiles (279 Palestinians vs 201 Israelis).
Systematic language bias favouring Israelis: BBC used emotive terms 4 times more for Israeli victims, applied ‘massacre’ 18x more to Israeli casualties, and used ‘murder’ 220 times for Israelis vs once for Palestinians.
Suppression of genocide allegations: BBC presenters shut down genocide claims in over 100 documented instances whilst making zero mention of Israeli leaders’ genocidal statements, including Netanyahu’s biblical Amalek reference.
Muffling Palestinian voices: The BBC interviewed significantly fewer Palestinians than Israelis (1,085 v 2,350) on TV and radio, while BBC presenters shared the Israeli perspective 11 times more frequently than the Palestinian perspective (2,340 v 217).
https://cfmm.org.uk/bbc-on-gaza-israel-one-story-double-standards/
Over 400 media figures, including 111 BBC staffers, have signed a letter demanding the BBC remove board member Robbie Gibb over conflict of interest on Gaza and the Middle East and his “consistent efforts to stifle legitimate coverage of Israel’s war on Gaza”
https://institute.aljazeera.net/en/ajr/article/3250
Today Drop Site News is publishing a landmark investigation about the BBC’s coverage of Israel’s unrelenting assault on Gaza by British journalist Owen Jones. His report is based on interviews with 13 journalists and other BBC staffers who offer remarkable insights into how senior figures within the BBC’s news operation skewed stories in favor of Israel’s narratives and repeatedly dismissed objections registered by scores of staffers who, throughout the past 14 months, demanded that the network uphold its commitment to impartiality and fairness. Jones’s investigation of the BBC has three main components: a deeply reported look into the internal complaints from BBC journalists, a quantitative assessment of how the BBC characterizes the year-long siege on Gaza, and a review of the histories of the people behind the coverage—and, in particular, one editor, Raffi Berg.
https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/bbc-civil-war-gaza-israel-biased-coverage
This just begs the question of who “Newsguard” is and why anyone should trust them.
There’s dozens of conservative sites that do these ratings for right wing crap and give them high scores, too.
The US government shouldn’t be relied on for credible or reliable information.
They can’t be relied on for anything.
Incredibly bleak, given how much they’ve historically invested in demographic, scientific, and economic data analysis.
But even when you look back on that data and information, the majority of it was skewed and manipulated to conform to and confirm a very specific set of values, politics and beliefs … much of whom didn’t have the best interests of people but rather in coddling corporate interests, the economy, money and power.
While that may be true, I think it’s also generally correct that the information was generally based on objective reality, even if the interpretation was skewed. Now, they are just making up information, and using it to support that narrative they wanted. It’s easier when you can skip objective reality to make up the story you want, and continue to repeat it as indisputable fact
the majority of it was skewed and manipulated to conform to and confirm a very specific set of values, politics and beliefs
That’s the nature of human observation and analysis. Everyone brings their own baggage.
The raw data continues to prove useful reference material for anyone looking to independently analyze policy.
Miss Leavitt is the reason that dumb blonde jokes actually exist.
Miss? She’s not even married? How is it that she is accepted by her fellow fascists?
At least mentally she is a miss. As in miss by a mile…
Does she read his diaper shit like tea leaves to determine what is true?
Reading? No. Tasting? Yes.
Didn’t Donny post an AI video of him flying a jet and dropping shit on protesters? Didn’t Donny post an AI video of himself playing guitar?
How is calling a news network fake not lible and opening up the government to be sued?
Ma’am, excuse me but, you’re a fucking idiot.
Waiting for the first nation to label the US Government as a rogue state.
Every fucking day this portion of the US government is so much like WWE.
This is prime entertainment for the Kremlin.
I’m not even sure it’s not just a coincidence either.
When the President is the WWE Hall of Fame, and Secretary of Education owns the organization…
She was groomed. Its weird when she has anything to say.
BBC should report that.
Ah, the liar paradox
That is the highest compliment you can give a news outlet. Great work BBC.
100 a fake human she is.
