Alabama is seeking to become the first state to execute a prisoner by making him breathe pure nitrogen.

The Alabama attorney general’s office on Friday asked the state Supreme Court to set an execution date for death row inmate Kenneth Eugene Smith, 58. The court filing indicated Alabama plans to put him to death by nitrogen hypoxia, an execution method that is authorized in three states but has never been used.

Nitrogen hypoxia is caused by forcing the inmate to breathe only nitrogen, depriving them of oxygen and causing them to die. Nitrogen makes up 78% of the air inhaled by humans and is harmless when inhaled with oxygen. While proponents of the new method have theorized it would be painless, opponents have likened it to human experimentation.

  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s a pretty good way to go, apparently.

    But there have been an absolutely breathtaking number of death row cases that have been overturned due to new evidence that had exonerated the condemned.

    It seems pretty clear that the state is doing a very crappy job of determining guilt, and therefore shouldn’t be handing down such a permanent sentence.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I used to fully pro death penalty, especially for some of the sick fucks…

      But then I learned about all the false convictions, some COERCED by the fucking police, and since then I’m 100% against the death penalty.

      The satisfaction I get from a heinous killer getting killed, does not outweigh the horror I feel for even one innocent life being taken by the state.

      • insomniac@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s also cheaper to keep people in jail forever than put them to death because of all the appeals. And despite being more careful, we still get it wrong.

    • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is what changed my mind on the death penalty. I have no problem putting a murderer or pedo to death, but we keep freeing people when new evidence is found that proves their innocents. Until we can get it right 100% of the time, we should just lock them up until death.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah this is one reason why I generally don’t support the death penalty. There’s no way to undo it. At least if evidence exonerates someone 50 years later, they’re still alive.

      • DLSchichtl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        2 years ago

        Then you haven’t tried it. Your body is still able to dump co2, so the asphyxiation effect doesn’t kick in.

          • Notorious_handholder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            2 years ago

            Years ago when I was in a bad place in life I attempted suicide using a tank of nitrogen and an oven bag. Thankfully I was stupid as hell and didn’t tie the bag properly or something. So when I passed out the bag managed to come off somehow. Still not entirely sure how it happened but either way I’m thankful it did and I managed to survive for better days.

            Anyways, Im telling you this to let you know I can very much confirm that breathing nitrogen is painless and was no different than regular breathing.

            Your body only starts the alarm bells when it can’t exchange out the co2 in your lungs. It can’t really tell the difference between pure nitrogen and some other gases coming in vs the optimal mixture we need to breath. So the alarms never really go off. There’s more to the science behind it, but it’s kind of a glaring flaw evolution left in our bodys survival system that can be taken advantage of including for use in anesthetic.

              • Notorious_handholder@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Yeah sort of. At first I started feeling very drunk, but not like normal drunk. I can’t really think of good analogy other than it was like half way in between drunk and a small amount of anesthetic maybe?

                It was this slow dip into unconscious, it wasn’t like sleeping where I’m vaguely aware of the passage of time. But it wasn’t the instant knock out of anesthetic or normal unconscious either. It was like lowering myself into a pool if that make sense. Wasn’t a bad feeling, just kind of different. Had an awful migraine that lasted a couple of days afterwards though.

                Thanks I’m extremely happy everday with my failure! Lol

          • DLSchichtl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            2 years ago

            My wife is a detective and deals with a lot of suicides. Use of nitrogen or helium are the new go to for folks that wanna go peacefully. That’s why the party balloon helium tanks have 10% o2 in them now. They were a popular, cheap method sadly. The human body doesn’t give two shits whether it’s breathing a 80% nitrogen/20% oxygen, or 100% nitrogen. All it needs is something that can displace the co2 in your blood. Nitrogen works just as well as o2 for this. It’s when the body can’t exhaust co2 that it goes into asphyxiation. If you were having problems breathing, you were breathing the wrong stuff. It’s biology, yo.

          • jumperalex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I’ve been in a high altitude simulation chamber to experience hypoxia after rapid decompression. 💯 didn’t give a fuck, was a bit giddy, and if left there long enough with dwindling oxygen would have for sure died. No problem taking a breath.

            So in effect, yes tried it.

              • jumperalex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                haha I can’t remember if we were doing cards like that or not. I remember having to answer questions writing them down on a form. Between the handwriting and the answers themselves it was hilarious; and of course educational. It was for certification to do high altitude jumps. you can bet your ass I made sure I was on oxygen per regs every time. No forgetting to pull the cord for me thank you very much.

      • angrystego@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Can you please share more of your experience? What was the occasion and the set-up? What was it like?

  • alvvayson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If ever I would need to be killed, this would be my preferred method of leaving the earth.

    Happy to see them try it, even though I am against executing people.

    With hypoxia, you get euphoria prior to death. No suffering, no pain, just a little high to send you off this earth.

    • Roboticide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sure, but as long as they have the death penalty, it’s probably best they do it as humanely as possible.

      Some states are bringing back firing squads, which definitely feels like a huge step back. If they’re going to kill someone, using an actual painless option instead of lethal injection or shooting them seems like as much of a step forward as we can get up to actually not executing people.

      • cassie 🐺@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        For the person being executed, firing squads are among the most “humane” methods. It’s fast, reliable, and simple. It’s not common because the brutality of painting someone’s brains on the wall is too clear for onlookers.

        • Roboticide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Typically they aim for the heart. Not exactly an immediate or painless death.

          I’d rather have the nitrogen.

    • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yep. Which is how we end up building FUCKING concentration camps in the country and pave that road for a dictatorship to take over one of, if not the, leading super powers of the world.

      This shit needs to stop and we need to address what is happening in the south before we start having some repeats that end in mass death. Enough is enough.

  • c0mput0r@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is how I would want to go. Look up BBC Horizon 2008 How to Kill a Human Being. Explains everything you need to know. Seems like states don’t want to do it because people wouldn’t suffer during execution. Maybe things have changed since then.

  • Mowcherie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I get that it is ‘humane,’ but I get scared when I see humans developing and organizing highly efficient ways to exterminate humans, such as gas chambers.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    Folks who are confused by this, your body doesn’t detect when you’re low on oxygen, only when you have too much carbon dioxide. That’s why exhaling while holding your breath helps you hold your breath longer (to an extent). Nitrogen doesn’t caused the sensation of suffocating while still depriving you of oxygen.

    I disagree with capital punishment but have always wondered about this for stuff like assisted suicide.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Over this summer I’ve been trying to break my record for holding breath underwater. 2:13 was best I could muster but in my experimentation, after slow and steady initial breathing and reduced muscle usage, inhaling one giant breath at the end and holding definitely let’s me stay under longer. This is better until the CO2 saturation of my lungs equals the saturation in the blood. Then, for whatever reason, slowly trickling the air out buys a little more time. This probably helps calm and fool the brain into thinking you’re desaturating.

    • JTheDoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      That’s the thing, we all have to compromise. I don’t support it either, but if something unethical happens, and people still want to keep supporting it, we have to at least convince them to use the “best version” of said thing so it’s at least as humane as we can make it possibly be. I’m shocked we still continue to use these complicated and ancient methods of execution that have questionable reliability or ethics when it comes to suffering.

      It’d be interesting to see how it would be used for AS for sure!

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Surgical tech here… why not just use Propofol? It’s the shit we use to put people to sleep for surgery.

    It kicks in FAST - when the anesthesiologist pushes that stuff, it can literally take like 5-10 seconds for the patients to go unconscious.

    So… for the death penalty, hit em with the normal dosage to put them to sleep, then once they’re confirmed unconscious, push the rest of the bottle… or a liter of gasoline… or chuck em out the window; it doesn’t matter, as they’ll be 100% unaware of the actual method of death.

    Edit - turns out there’s a lot of good reasons we don’t just use Propofol - see comments below. Thanks for the insight, all!

    • lgmjon64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      They used to use thiopental, which is similar to propofol, with similar onset, both as an anesthesic and for lethal injection. Manufacturers stopped producing it because its use was controversial. Now it’s not even available for anesthesia. It would suck if the same thing happened to propofol.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Because the people selling it don’t want to deal with the association with lethal injections

    • JdW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      anesthesiologist

      There you have it, qualified medical professionals refuse (and are not allowed to anyway because of the oath) to participate in executions. So the people administring whatever concoction is made are not medically trained nor usually even particularily knowledgable on the subject. And yes, this has caused a series of botched executions, to the extent that the most bloodthirsty states are looking at smimpler ways to execute. Hence this aricle.

    • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      They already render the prisoner unconcious when they administer the lethal injection. It’s not 100% effective though, thus the search for a method that doesn’t have the potential to horrify onlookers.

  • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Pretty weird phrasing of the headline, like states are excited to kill someone in new and novel ways.

  • Pat12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Smith was one of two men paid $1,000 each to murder Elizabeth Sennett on behalf of her preacher husband, Charles Sennett Sr., who was in debt and wanted to collect life insurance money.”

    Hold on, so why is he being executed? He wasn’t the one who ordered the murder. It seems like lots of other people request murders but those people aren’t sentenced to death.

    • Roboticide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Because he accepted money in exchange to brutally beat and stabbed a person to death. “Just following orders,” has never been an acceptable excuse for an individual to commit a crime, but especially when it’s not an order in a military hierarchy, it’s payment and a voluntary agreement. Fuck him.

      Sennet Sr. committed suicide the moment the police started to investigate him. That’s why he’s not about to be executed.

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t think that was the argument being made. The argument, to me, is why sentenced to death instead of some other sentence. And, were the others that are also part of this crime sentenced.

        The article doesn’t seem to say anything about what happened to the others that are involved. Focused a lot on the execution method.

        Sounds like the guy just did this for the money so I also don’t understand why he’s being sentenced to death. Should just be prison time. But, I don’t have all the facts here.

        • Roboticide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          He’s sentenced to death because he committed a capital murder in a state with the death penalty and a jury found him guilty. “I did it for money” is not exactly a legal defense. An innocent person was still killed, and arguably doing it for money is worse. Fuck him.

          The other guy involved in the killing has already been executed, over ten years ago. It’s a well documented case and took me about a minute of Googling to figure out this guy isn’t particularly being singled out for death and the other got a lighter sentence.

          I personally don’t believe in the death penalty, but also if he didn’t want to be executed for murder, he shouldn’t have committed murder in the deep south.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      because the medical companies they got their lethal injections from decided they’d rather not be associated with governmental killing.

      then the foreign countries they bought from decided the same. so now they have to get creative.

      Personally, I’d like to see a 500t press option: literally just drop a 500t weight on me from a 30’ height. By the time my brains register any sensation they’ll be strawberry jelly squishing out the sides of the press plate.

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This isn’t a new innovation and is actually aware of the science. I think, however, conservative elected officials will insist on continuing Capital Punishment and the world is forced to work with or in many cases against them.

  • PlanetOfOrd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    While proponents of the new method have theorized it would be painless, opponents have likened it to human experimentation.

    Isn’t that how we’re doing the death penalty anyway? We’re trying to find a “painless” way to kill someone, but is there ever really a painless way to do this? I’d imagine even if I’m sitting in a massage chair with classical music playing it wouldn’t matter if I knew that half an hour from now I wouldn’t be leaving the room.

    And we can’t really ask doctors because doctors have taken an oath to “do no harm.”

    The death penalty is just a punishment no one wants to do (well, okay, I’m sure there are plenty of people that have no problem with it), but we’ve told ourselves that we have to do it.

    • Meldroc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ll admit, it’s an improvement over previous methods, though that’s not saying much. Everything’s normal, breathing fine, until lights out!

      My objection to the death penalty is that sooner or later, it’s inevitable, the law will fuck it up and execute innocent people. Some people just can’t do adulting around this. Sooner or later, a crime happens, people clamor for blood, the state rounds up the wrong guy and railroads him.

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      This isn’t experimentation and it isn’t new. I fucking hate this talking point. It’s a well-established, safe, and potentially harmless method, unlike the shit we were doing before.

      Still doesn’t make it right.