• rustyfish@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    You guys remember when you woke up and our biggest problem was Disney disappointing people with its Star Wars trilogy?

    Kinda miss those times now.

    • Soleos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      19 days ago

      The Last Jedi and and Rise of Skywalker came out during Trump’s first term, UK had triggered article 50, natural disasters, North Korea was ramping up nuclear testing, a new age of fake news was taking shape, trade war, rise of Hindu nationalism… you know what you’re right, I do miss those times compared to now… But you know maybe this is the second act when things are most dire before… Well depends on the story arc 😅

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Not to ruin your moment, but both the Rwandan genocide and the Bosnian genocide happened several years before the star wars prequels

      • TheFonz@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        I’m not trying to scare you, but the 90s was over two decades ago… I know I’m still in denial too

  • carlossurf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    19 days ago

    All those morons who voted for trump hope you enjoy being even more broke for the next decade and your sons going to war to die so rich cunts can get richer

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 days ago

      If I have to bludgeon you to death for the last tin of beans in a radioactive wasteland, its nothing personal.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I know they’ve tried but does Iran really have any viable nuclear capability? Or is it just like Iraq where the hydro-electric aluminium tubes are justification?

      • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 days ago

        They have the capability but they’re not there yet. They’re trying to get there, but every time they make progress Israel bombs them back to square. It’s been an effective strategy to stall Iran’s ability to get nukes.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          I mean it’s some pretty serious overstepping… Nobody even does that to North Korea, even though they get ever closer to developing a ballistic missile, something capable of delivering a nuke (which they do have). But nobody is bombing NK… Why? Because that’s a fucking act of war!

          Bombing Iranian facilities is just an egregious breach of their sovereignty. If on the other hand, some country tried that against the US, it would be a major international incident as soon as they crossed into our airspace, regardless of whether they deployed a single munition. But if they did hit a target, a completely unproportional retaliatory bombing campaign would ensue.

          And the only reason Israel gets away with this dangerously aggressive behavior is that they have the military might of the US at their back. They believe they’re untouchable because they assume the US will always be an ally. And truth be told, it’s all a terrible policy for their own longevity. Some day, eventually, we’ll have a president with a conscience and a Congress that supports them, and then we’ll stop giving weapons to Israel. And on that day Israel will finally have to take responsibility for their actions, and we’ll see what their neighbors really think of them. Until then, they continue to dig themselves into a deeper hole, convinced that it’s the safest way forward.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Let’s not make them out to be saints, either. They’re very squarely aligned witb China and Russia.

          • To be fair, they really don’t have any other option. They’ve already made the US a long-term enemy both culturally and politically, and, despite that, Iran still seeks to be a key geopolitical player. There aren’t many other avenues for that in the short term, which is all that usually matters for a dictatorship.

            Things will be shaking up in the next few years, so let’s see whether they’ll continue to be perceived as antagonistic to the world at large as the US shifts into goblin mode and khamenei kicks the bucket, hopefully loosening oppression.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              Building Nuclear Weapons solve exactly zero of their problems. Just look at North Korea as an example. I also don’t really like the prospects of another civil war in the Middle East.

              Iran’s core problem in Geopolitics, lack of foreign investment despite an increasingly educated population, is due to their own underinvestment in agriculture and stifled private-sector growth due to government corruption and collusion. Most of their exports are oil and gas in most years. They recently had a multiple year recession where GDP continuously shrank.

              Compare them to other middle eastern regions like Afghanistan which provides the majority of the world’s real Saffron and a hefty sum of Gold, Turkey which exports Cars, or Syria which exports Olive Oil. Iran has the climate and resources to expand and diversify in a lot of sectors but instead it continues to cut government subsidies and increase taxes, it’s just not sustainable.

              • I honestly don’t know enough about economics to dispute anything you’ve said. I will point out that this dispute is nearly entirely unrelated to nuclear capabilities, though. Were both Israel and Iran to both disarm their nuclear capabilities, they’d both still seek to tear into one another for a host of theology-adjacent reasons.

  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    19 days ago

    As shitty as this is, I think Iran is a paper tiger. Israel has been beating the shit out of them for years now. I don’t think they’re going to be able to successfully counterattack in any meaningful way.

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        So, I appreciate this is the internet, and text does a piss poor job of communicating inflection and sarcasm, but surely there’s a limit to the necessity of the /s? This year already we’ve had to rely on the restraint of Iran to maintain a semblance of peace five or so times in the face of direct Israeli aggression. How could anyone take what I said at face value?