• Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    If it’s jot you then the question becomes, are you willing to commit suicide so a reasonable facsimile of you can save some strangers.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d pull the lever if I was tied to the other track. The only meaningful difference is that there will be someone who shares my values and experiences roaming the earth after I die. I can live with that.

      I wonder if that would inspire him to become healthier and live longer. If I knew someome sacrificed their life so I could live, I would probably treat my body a lot better. Maybe I should go through a transporter…

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If it’s a wormhole or Niven-style teleporter, it’s unarguably you coming through the process. Star Trek… I’ll grant that the conversation gets a little more complicated.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Define “you.” An identical collection and pattern of atoms and subatomic particles? Then yes. A continuous consciousness as experienced by the “me” on the entry side of the teleporter? No.

    Would I kill myself to save five lives and create one? Yes

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is no way to know that were not constantly dying and being replaced. The experience of continuity may be an illusion because you don’t notice that you’re only alive for a split second, and replacing the consciousness that was alive a split second before you.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Okay? That’s all well and good, but there is a way to know that a transporter does kill you. Given a choice between maybe living or definitely dying, I’m gonna choose the former.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This here, although teleporters might actually be implemented in a way that transmits the original being to the destination. It’s a fictional technology after all, so why not?

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I hate that comic. Equivocation is a fallacy. Your alarm clock is proof that you don’t lose experiential consciousness when you sleep.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          What comic and no it doesn’t. And reading through your exchange with the other guy it’s clear we have very different ideas about the nature of self-identity. I don’t think of my body as necessary for “me” to exist, I am my thoughts and memory rather than my neurons and chemistry. If that information can be copied and transmitted then there will be a “me” that continues from a new location.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            There will be a you, but it’s not the same you. If you read my exchange with the other guy, then what are your thoughts on the “shot in the head” topic? Would you be okay with this you being killed in a very real and visceral way, as long as a you would be reconstructed elsewhere?

  • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’ve shed and replaced every atom that you were made of when you were born and many times over since then, are you still that same entity?

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, but you didn’t shed them all at once. If the ship of Theseus exploded, and then they built a new one, the question wouldn’t be, “Which is the true ship of Theseus?” it would be, “Hey, did you guys see Theseus’ new ship?”

      • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s all just abstract philosophy on a non-reality scenario, I’m just having fun with it.

        On a heavily relative note, though, has anyone watched Space Dandy? The show about a dandy guy in space?

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I did, and I remember enjoying it, but that was 10 years ago and I don’t remember it that well. Did they have a teleporter?

          • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            They had one, but it was never existential. They had warp, though, and it put them in the same but different dimension when they used it, so Space Dandy’s cosmic energy warped every time he used it, essentially changing him at a material and energy level but not a conscious one. He has a relationship with an energy entity that decides they can’t be with him because he’s literally not the man they fell in love with, and because he’s used the warp so much his energy is essentially changing the fundamental make-up of the universe.

            • pjwestin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, I do remember that the series ended with him being given the opportunity to become God (AKA the narrator of the show), and him turning it down, creating a universe without God, which appeared to make everything the same but without narration. I assume that was related to the cosmic energy? Fun idea, but, to bring it back to Theseus, his continued consciousness despite his physical transformation into energy implies the existence of an intangible part of his being (AKA a soul) that continues beyond his human brain. If we ever prove that transporters are teleporting our souls, I’ll happily use one. Otherwise, they are 100% suicide booths.

              • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Meh, I don’t think we have souls, I’d take the suicide booth, it would be cathartic. Especially if it does the fix your health issues thing like the Star Trek teleporters do (except the times it would get in the way of the plot, so it just doesn’t. Because.) maybe I could get a functioning thyroid out of it.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    My concern would be less about whether it sends the original or creates a perfect copy, but more about how reliable it is. Getting Riker’d/Boimler’d would be okay, but having more than a negligible chance of any other sort of transporter accident would definitely give me pause.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The trolley problem but the only way to pull the lever is to take a nap first.

    Since your consciousness stopped and then a new was started from the same meat is it still you?

    If it is, then surely a new consciousness constructed from a pile of meat identical to your brain would also be you?

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          What we call “unconsciousness” is really just a state of reduced consciousness. Your mind is maintained throughout, and you’re still aware of the outside world, just to a lesser extent.