• ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    I’ve had enough of this “you can’t blame democrats for what Republicans are doing.” They’ve set up and maintained a system where they’re the only people who can push back on the fascists, and now that the time has come they’re refusing to stand up, and keeping anyone else from standing up.

    They’re not just incompetent, they’re complicit. The billionaires and Republicans are our Nazis, and the Democrat leadership are our Vichy France.

    • SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      27 days ago

      Don’t worry both sides are not the same though so you can take that to the bank, not the same bank that the democrats are cashing their corporate checks in though because that would be unseemly.

      I am only half kidding, maybe a quarter kidding.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        If you can watch what’s been going on for the past two months, and still believe this both sides bullshit, then you’re a fucking idiot.

        Are Democrats corporate stooges and feckless cowards? Yeah most of them.

        But this is next level. You’re insane if you think it would be anything like this had Harris won.

        • ceenote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          27 days ago

          I’m not an advocate for “Both sides are the same” but I am an advocate for “Democrats are failing to meet the moment and we should fire the whole leadership.”

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Are Democrats corporate stooges and feckless cowards? Yeah most of them.

          And from a functional standpoint, that means no meaningful opposition.

  • Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    27 days ago

    That’s the default setting for Democrats in every situation, until there’s a whiff of class solidarity in the air. Then the Democrats suddenly become the most powerful force imaginable, able to tank campaigns and careers with a phone call.

  • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    The lawmaker said Democrats are worried they would get the blame for a shutdown if they voted to defeat the House bill. The House is out of session for the rest of the week, upping the pressure on Senate Democrats.

    Voters haven’t punished Republicans for their numerous shut downs. But that said, voters are always more likely to blame Democrats for anything at all.

    In the article there are definitely some interesting points. Like how Elon would probably use the shut down to fire even more people. Or Trump would use it to take even more power from Congress.

    I still think the Democrats need to stand firm and refuse to vote for it, make Republicans pass it via reconciliation. Shut it down if necessary. But there’s definitely a lot of possibly terrible outcomes to a shut down to consider.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      27 days ago

      The Republicans literally control the entire government. Everything that is happening is their fault and if the Democrats feel like that won’t be the case they suck at their fucking job.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        They don’t control the entire government in this context. That’s why they need Democrat votes.

        As for fault: the spending bill is in itself reasonable. Refusing to vote for it may be the optimal strategy (I don’t know) but it doesn’t look great.

  • LupusBlackfur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Of course they are.

    And, of course they will.

    Feckless spineless wimps that they are.

    🤡 🤦‍♀️ 🖕

  • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    I’ve said this before (fucking search my comment history if you dare), Both parties are two sides of a shit sandwich (yes, the republicans are the side where the actual turn is in). We need a 3rd party to compete, and actually organize to push both of these parties out. Won’t be overnight, but we can – and should, do it.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    An important thing you all need to understand about the Filibuster: it’s not the final vote. It’s basically a vote to stop talking and hold a vote. So all the Democrats can do with a Filibuster is delay (perhaps indefinitely).

    But as a wise Canadian philosopher once noted: “If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice”. What to Democrats gain by delaying this indefinitely? Without some action, the government gets shut down. All they gain is a closed government and a bunch of fingers pointed at them. Republicans know this, and will not give any concessions for Democratic votes.

    The best move is to allow the vote, and then vote against the actual bill. They make their objection known, but still allow the government to stay open.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      27 days ago

      Didn’t hurt the Republicans every time they threatened a shutdown when the Democrats were in power. And if the Dems think they can get some concessions from the R’s by forcing the country to get hit, then it might be worth it to stop some crazy shit in the long run.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        They will get no concessions, because Republicans do not care if the Federal government shuts down. They want to drown it in the bathtub. Republicans are effective weaponizing the government shutdown because they know they don’t care, and Democrats do.

        However, government shutdown in general are very unpopular. When Republicans go there, their immediate popularity takes a hit. The problem is that American voters have short memories, and are likely to forget before the next election.

        • Mr_Crash_Davis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          You hit it on the head!

          I’m all about trying to obstruct what the GOP are doing…but what’s the gain in picking this fight? What’s the “better deal” to be had?

          If I were a GOPer that truly cared about the national debt, I’d be pissed that Johnson is passing an extension of Biden spending priorities after he said back in December that the budget fight would come in March. Of course we’ll see how many “budget hawks” actually remember that conversation.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          They will get no concessions, because Republicans do not care if the Federal government shuts down.

          A shutdown is preferable to expediting this and giving republicans an earlier opportunity to move on to other, worse legislation. Thought democrats were about harm reduction. Guess that was just a lie to get people to vote for their pro-genocide candidates.

    • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      But as a wise Canadian philosopher once noted: “If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice”.

      iseewhatyoudidthere.jpg

      Now it’s stuck in my head.

  • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    Shutdowns really suck if you’re employed by the federal government. Nothing makes you feel more powerless than either being told you’re not allowed to do your job because your employer can’t figure out its shit or you’re told you have to work, but you aren’t guaranteed your next scheduled paycheck until the shutdown ends, and in 2018-19, it was really unclear when it would end. And if you’re furloughed and get back-pay for not working, you’re viewed poorly by the public for getting paid not to work, even though it wasn’t your fault. I could definitely see Democrats being blamed for all the bad things resulting from a shutdown, even though it’s provisions in the GOP bill that are ultimately causing it to happen. Holding federal employees’ paychecks and government services to the public hostage is absolutely the shittiest way to conduct political business.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’m a federal employee. Being furloughed for awhile scares me less than what DOGE is doing. Every coworker I’ve discussed it with (and it’s frequently discussed at my office) feels the same way.

      • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        27 days ago

        I’m all for whatever maximizes the pain for DOGE. What would that be? A 40-day shutdown showdown that results in a better spending bill?

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        DOGE is not a government agency and would presumably continue working regardless of shutdown. They could continue to operate under Musks funding.