The 3 that come to mind for me are Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz and The Princess Bride. All three are poking fun at their respective genres but also are great examples of the genre. I’m curious if Lemmy has other such examples.

    • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      There is a curse in the Star Trek movies where every other movie in the franchise is terrible. The first one is bad, the second is good, the third is bad, and so on. This almost fits perfectly, but it inverts from the 10th movie onwards. The 9th is bad, the 10th is bad, the 11th is decent, the 12th is bad…

      However, if you add Galaxy Quest into the line up, then it’s the good Star Trek movie between the 9th and 10th, and the pattern holds.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I prefer the explanation that the bad movies are those which are odd if you add up their digits. It would mean 19 and 20 should be both good.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Scream was incredibly meta. It references plenty of slasher films and even has one character talking about the rules of slasher films.

    While it’s not exactly a parody, it does poke fun at its own genre a lot.

    • mindbleach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      Scream is the perfect answer. It was a response to the waning 80s slasher boom, making it all more real, more visceral, and more of a threat to the savvy audience, while still being funny as hell. Comedy and horror go beautifully together. There’s a shared tension with the unknown.

      • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        Scream is the perfect answer because Scary Movie didn’t get the joke and assumed it was a normal slasher, so they tried to make a parody of it.

      • Y|yukichigai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 years ago

        After watching Season 2 of The Orville I’m of the opinion that Seth MacFarlane should be put in charge of the next mainline Star Trek series. The man truly gets Roddenberry’s vision.

        • 1bluepixel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Nah. I respect what MacFarlane is trying to do, but Orville is nowhere as good as TNG or SNW. It echoes TNG in a lot of ways but never rises above it. The writing is more heavy-handed and MacFarlane doesn’t have the gravitas or the acting chops to rise to these ambitions.

          It was good while the only current Trek we had was Picard and the godawful Discovery, but I think the SNW creators got the Trek mainline back on the tracks.

  • flicker@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 years ago

    Austin Powers was such a good spoof of the genre that it killed the genre it was spoofing (for a little while). It was also a great movie in its own right!

    To this day I’ll say “There you are!” And if someone asks if they know me, or if I was looking for them, or any number of things, I’ll say, “No, but there you are! You’re there!”

  • mindbleach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 years ago

    So a deconstruction / reconstruction shuffle. A work picking apart the tropes of a genre, making you question them… and then putting them back together in ways suited to a self-aware audience.

    One Punch Man looks like a decent example. The premise is a rebuke of who-is-stronger anime, like the endless power-level treadmill of Dragonball Z. The main dude is stronger. Next question. And the next question is, well, what does a setting with assorted superheroes and supervillains look like, if there’s some guy who is unbeatable 1v1, but is otherwise just some guy? Does society support him, after he’s basically relegated to an occasional “come save our asses” phone call? How do other supers proceed with their equally-cliche motivations, when SSJ4 Goku showed up in episode one?

    Shaun Of The Dead is definitely a reconstruction of zombie tropes - timed right at the crest of the 2000s zombie-movie revival. But Hot Fuzz is a little odd to mention here because it’s actually three distinct genres. It goes from screwball comedy to murder mystery to blockbuster action without missing a beat. Ironically I’d say the weakest part is the screwball comedy at the beginning. It’s very sedate compared to what it almost was: there’s a deleted scene where Angel did Word-art banners for each department, ending on rainbow lettering reading “sexual assault.” The opening we got is held-back to ease the later shifts in theme. And while each of these shifts is truly masterful, I’m not sure I’d call the movie as a whole a great example of anything it riffed on.

    Really - does it fit any movie marathon that would unironically include Point Break?

    • BigDev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I like the way you’ve explained the concept! I never could find the right word for it, I always thought of it as “meta” media, though that never seemed 100% right. “Reconstruction” is much better, it implies a more thorough understanding (and appreciation!) of the source material than mere meta-jokes. My concept of meta would lump Shaun of the Dead in with shit like Disaster Movie, which are obviously leagues apart.

      • mindbleach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        90s parody movies lean way too hard into deconstruction, and aren’t very good at it. They’re trying to say “here’s how that would really go” but lack the patience to be clever. E.g. Scary Movie 3 having a character square off against the scary girl from The Ring. That’s not a fully-formed joke. That’s a three-second cutaway gag in Family Guy.

        The clearest line between deconstruction and reconstruction might be Neon Genesis Evangelion versus Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann.

        Eva takes the cynicism and plausible physics of real-robot shows like Mobile Suit Gundam, and applies them to children piloting skyscraper-sized combat vehicles in monster-of-the-week battles. It doesn’t kill off characters left and right, and the action is rarely gory or played for shock value, but there’s a level of emotional violence that is unmatched outside of surrealism. It has an audience-insert protagonist specifically to go “this is you, and that is bad.” The last few episodes are infamously a sharp left turn into abstract philosophy and, like… giving characters therapy. On some level Neon Genesis Evangelion is a mecha anime series that actively despises its audience for enjoying mecha anime.

        Gurren went “yeah that’s nice” and wrote a love letter to joyously stupid mecha anime. The universe literally runs on whatever sounds awesome. It is unselfconsciously goofy in a way that wraps back around to being cool as fuck. Now: it’s not unaware of criticism. It was made by the same studio as Evangelion. But the key figures would eventually split off into Studio Trigger, whose output is primarily reconstructions - shows rooted in asking “how would this insane premise really work?” and then building a fun story within that universe.

  • AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    A bit older than the Orville, Red Dwarf was the original satire of Star Trek turned into a legitimate Sci-Fi show a la Star Trek.

    I enjoyed it a lot, at least the original seasons. Never watched the later ones they added thirty or so years later.

  • CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 years ago

    James Bond. Ian Fleming wrote a series of novels parodying spy novels, and they’ve turned into one of the best spy movie franchises, with no hint of parody left.

  • ass-destroyer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ll add Kick Ass and Starship Troopers. Although very different movies I feel like they both satirize their respective genres to great dramatic effect and stand out as some of my favorites.

    • SoNick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Starship Troopers is weird because the book went full on in embracing the military-industrial complex and was kind of shit because of it. The movie made it a parody instead and it worked great!
      …then they made a few sequels that yeah were more in line with the original book but in this case is that really a good thing?

      • Pea666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Starship Troopers is peak sci-fi in that it holds up a mirror for society to see the ugly bits.

    • SoNick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I came here to comment Sir Terry Pratchett’s works as well! They’re all really good while also poking fun at fantasy tropes