Because let’s say you’re Tom Hanks. And you get TomHanks@Lemmy.World

Well, what’s stopping someone else from adopting TomHanks@Lemm.ee?

And some platforms minimize the text size of platform, or hide it entirely. So you just might see TomHanks, and think it’s him. But it’s actually a 7 year old Chinese boy with a broken leg in Arizona.

Because anyone can grab the same name, on a different platform.

  • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Tom@tomhanks.com

    A celebrity can host their own domain to prove authenticity.

    So what. On Xitter I can make an account called Tom.Hanks and get the blue mark by paying Elon. Because Tom Hanks has the username Tom_Hanks.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    It should work the same as email: you can trust it’s them if the user account is hosted on their own site, or their employer’s, or if they link to it from another confirmed source.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      But look below in the comments. Can you even tell which of my comments came from Lemmy.World, and which comments didn’t? Some platforms will just show Lost_My_Mind. I can’t tell which platform @AbouBenAdhem is posting via. I just see AbouBenAdhem.

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not familiar with every client, but on mine it only hides the domain for users on my own server. (Early email used to work exactly the same—you could send an email addressed to just a username with no tld and it would go to the user with that name on your own server by default.)

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because with celebrities come fanbases.

      Imagine if whoever the new hot artist is put out their next music video exclusively on Peer-Tube.

      Suddenly millions of people would be using peer-tube. Then they’d ask “what is the fediverse?”

      If you want to keep the fediverse small and isolated, go stay on hexbear, or whatever that one isolated instance is.

      I would rather every single human be using the fediverse.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    You seem to be under the impression that it’s good if this place grows explosively. It’s not. There’s no VC to pay back here (and thank fuckin god for that). There’s no ad revenue here (again, this is good).

    Also, not entirely sure what exactly to make of the weirdly targeted quip about a Chinese child, but spidey sense says it’s nothing good.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not sure what VC stands for…

      But the Chinese boy with the broken leg is my 103 year old grandmother in a wheelchair. But he’s not actually Taylor Swift, which is the point of the comparison.

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s why she hosts her own domain, instead of sending half a million followers to some random fediverse instance.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This solves the issues of having the same username across all platforms, assuming you host an instance for every platform you want to use. And also mske those domains private. But it doesn’t address that same username being used on another instance/domain.

      Like imagine someone had the usernsme Ada@someoffensivedomain.social and was impersonating you. If you made your living off your name, an imposter would affect your image.

      • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        If I was making my living off of my name, I wouldn’t even know some random user with no followers from a troll domain exists.

        Whatever the reason celebs don’t take to the fediverse, this isn’t it…

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Reminds me of ICANN fucking up all the domain names.

    CocaCola.com CocaCola.new CocaCola.drink Cocacola.world CocaCola.bev

    Etc.

    Shameful. One thing that might work for the fediverse is federal institutions running their own Mastadon instances on .gov to move away from announcements on Twitter. You can’t fake .gov domains.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think it might be kind of nice to be Tom Hanks and have the name WilsonsOnlyFriend@lemmy.world and just chat and chill.

  • vamp07@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I see this as a benefit. Generally speaking celebrity posts are the most useless threads on most platforms.

  • RandomVideos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Discord and email worked for a long time with needing something extra after the name. Why would the fediverse be different?