• Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    47 minutes ago

    I’m an old guy with a long romantic career. When I had this conversation it was about shaving her legs. I understand some young people these days expect full Brazillian, or at least a tidy trim. I suspect this figures into the current segregation of the sexes.

    One first-date purposely did not shave her legs as a disincentive for intimacy, I wouldn’t have minded, but she felt embarrassed over one day’s growth. We were chaste that night, but had a second date.

    Different partners trimmed or shaved completely (some brave women waxed) and I was delightedin all cases. In LTRs, sometimes shaving resulted consistently in ingrown hairs, in which case I insisted please don’t do so on my behalf.

    But then, I was a kid in the 1970s and society was getting accustomed to the idea of being our natural selves, body hair, (armpit hair,) and all. It stemmed, I think, from the hippy movement. It was very live and let live.

    But of course, for the glamour and cosmetics industry, that just wouldn’t do.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Is that an absolute statement, or in general?

      Like, if some fwll out while you were going to town and got their hair on it, would you pick it back up? Let’s ignore the obvious problems with eating sweets and a partner at the same time for the question.