• Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Like what kind of fucking trash do you have to be? It’s a floating luxury palace, I’m sure it has a helicopter aboard it. He’s in no rush, all the money in the world, and with the opportunity comes up to be a good person, he not only refused to help once, but repeatedly.

    The captain should be stripped of their license and he should be unable to own or operate a boat within American waters. Better yet, make him pay 250 million to park it in a US harbor, and spring it on him with the boat has no choice but to dock and refuel in the US.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Mark Zuckerberg has faced questions over why a small cruise ship in south-east Alaska rescued a stranded skiff and its crew when his 387ft superyacht had been closer.

    The Silicon Valley billionaire’s yacht, worth a reported $300m, is said to have “repeatedly” declined to assist when a nearby boat called for help last week.

    Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook and Instagram owner Meta Platforms, was not onboard at the time, a spokesperson told Forbes.

    So, basically, it starts to look like they have standing orders to be selfish and anti-social to point of pushing up against maritime law.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The reply? Because I didn’t want the poors on my yacht.

    He is a disgusting parasite PoS – also an acceptable answer.

  • BeBopALouie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yuckerburg change his story today and said that they didn’t hear it. I read it in another article people from another boat not sure which one were booing them so they must have known ?

  • shweddy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    $5 says there were kids on his boat

    I’ll rescind this when the impartial 3rd party investigation says otherwise

    • Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Exactly. The people running the government in the surveillance state shouldn’t get the presumption of innocence.

      They are public figures and not only that they have all of the resources to provide proof of any claims that they make.