• muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    People forget head of the Vatican is an incredibly powerful political position. The pope changing his plans doesn’t say he’s afraid of you. It says you are less reasonable than the Catholic Church.

    His absence is so much more damaging to the GOP than his presence. He played them good!

    That being said, I am a little disappointed the pope didn’t call Donald’s bluff. If he shows up and died on American soil, the entire world (who needs only half a reason to stop tolerating our shit) would unite against us. If he survived, Trump would look even more impotent. Damn.

  • Stamau123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    2 days ago

    On the matter VP Vance had this to say “I think it’s always a bad idea to offer an opinion on stories that are unconfirmed and uncorroborated, so I’m not going to do that.”

    this is coming from the “Haitians are breaking into homes to eat your pets!” guy

    • ChadGPT2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Nothing reasonable about pedophile protecting fascist JD Vance. Let’s not allow them to position him as a viable leader.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    So they threatened the pope of the catholic church with assassination… Thats some Israeli level shit. Is Trump even the president at this point?

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The last pope died shortly after meeting with Vance. Sure he had pneumonia (but felt well enough to take a meeting), but Vance could conceivably have had something on his hand that interacted with the popes diminished health. Its pure speculation of course, and no one can prove it either way and the timing is suspect, when you see them now threatening the current pope with assassination. Assassination just comes to their mind huh?

      • andz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Vance doesn’t exactly look like the kind of guy who prioritizes washing his hands after a visit to the bathroom …or couch. Who knows what he had growing under those fingernails.

  • santa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Does threatening The Pope and starting a war with Iran disqualify you from retaining a gold plastic FIFA Peace Prize?

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is a huge story and I’m trying to find another source that also claims threats were made.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      https://www.newsweek.com/avignon-papacy-explained-what-reported-us-threat-to-pope-and-vatican-means-11803877

      As things got heated, Colby reportedly lectured Cardinal Pierre on the military power of the U.S. and told him that the Catholic Church must pick a side, according to Hale, and mentioned the “Avignon papacy.”

      All information about the meeting was obtained by Ferraresi from Vatican and U.S. officials briefed on the Pentagon meeting. What Could Such a Reference Indicate?

      There is no doubt that a reference to the “Avignon papacy” by a Pentagon official was meant to make the Vatican feel uneasy about crossing the Trump administration.

      Some have suggested that the reference of this chapter of medieval history might signal the Trump administration’s intention to trigger a new schism, while others think it would suggest its willingness to use military force against the Holy See. Ferraresi, however, said that interpreting it as a military threat is “just absurd.”

      According to Mike Young, author of a newsletter on civic accountability, the mention of the “Avignon papacy” was a reference to “an implicit model for what happens to religious institutions that oppose state power.”

      In a post on X, he wrote: “That’s not a slip of the tongue. That’s a studied historical reference deployed deliberately in a room with the Pope’s senior diplomat. The message was not subtle.”

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve seen other references elsewhere. Any quotes on what was said seem to reference the Free Press article. But the other sources are still reporting that there was a meeting, and the Vatican didn’t like what they heard,whatever it was.

      https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/pope-leo-visit-us-trump-president-b2954080.html

      According to Vatican and U.S. officials who were briefed on the meeting and spoke to the publication, the Pentagon criticized the Pope’s statements in January, interpreting them as hostile attacks on Trump’s policies.

      A Vatican official speaking to The Free Press said the Pope has no plans to visit the U.S. while Trump is in office.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    It would be ironic if Trump does to the Vatican what he did to Venezuela, even after the US Catholic Bishops’ drive toward outlawing Abortion might have been the decisive factor giving Trump enough support to win both elections.

    • dance_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      From what I’ve seen, there seems to be a difference in priorities between Catholic leadership in America vs the rest of the world. If the Republicans continue to antagonize the Pope, that would probably work in their favor.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re not wrong, but that’s not the way Catholicism works. People overplay the “infallibility” angle, but the bishops are supposed to listen to the Pope, that’s the whole point.

        The logical end result of “a difference in priorities between Catholic leadership in America vs the rest of the world.” is either that the US bishops get in line, or we have a new Schism.

        And I think this Pope knows it. The original Pope Leo is literally the Patron Saint of “defending against heresy”. He chose that name for a reason.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s the middle ground of enough bishops get fired to bring the rest inline.

        • dance_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’re totally right about the fact that they’re supposed to follow the Pope, but they’re also throwing references to the Avignon Papacy.

          It could also very well be a schism where you have the American cardinals declare the Pope is from their own ranks backed by the State while another is in Rome. We’ve already seen a superpower do this with Buddhism.

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Someone in the meeting then reportedly mentioned the Avignon Papacy to Pierre. This refers to a 14th century attack on the Vatican by the French king, in which Pope Boniface VIII was murdered by assassins and the Vatican was forced to relocate to Avignon where it could be controlled by the French crown for the next 67 years.

    Sounds like they’re threatening to do to the pope what they did to Maduro.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Vatican could probably wipe out just about any government on Earth if it wanted to. They’ve got billions of sleeper agents all over the world who’d do whatever it tells them, many of them in the very governments they want to destroy. “The US has threatened to destroy Catholicism. You know what you need to do!” and suddenly everyone from mafiosos to Irish grannies to couch fuckers would be booking flights to Mar-a-Lago.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Organized crime is in bed with the administration make no mistake. They are junior partners, or in the case of organized crime in the service of certain nation-state actors they are controlling partners.

      Just as an aside, when Steve Bannon was in prison, he hung out with the mobsters.