• Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    185
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    A decade ago, It was predicted that we would hit 1.5°C between 2050-2060, and even as recently as 2 years ago the prediction had moved forward to between 2030-2040.
    The next decade or two are going to be very… interesting

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The IPCC calculations were always criticized for being overly optimistic. Anyone following this debate knew that we would hit 1.5 C sooner rather than later.

      We are definitely going to hit 3 degrees in our lifetime, once the melting tundras release their methane store.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        If anyone is curious about what 3C looks like, here’s a solid video on how a 3C world would look.

        https://youtu.be/uynhvHZUOOo?si=yk8rvR1Bg3t4aKGe

        It’s 16 minutes so as a TL;DW: Not “extinction event” but extremely bad. Areas of the globe will simply become unlivable - and these areas tend to be highly populated. The resulting mass migrations and shortages of water/food will lead to conflict, often between nuclear powers. End result: humanity will keep on living, but it will be a significantly more deadly environment and a significantly more conflict-prone political environment. Economic collapse will hit major metropolitan centers.

        If watching the video bums you out try to focus on the absolutely bonkers cool sideburns the climate scientist has. Cheered me up a little. Like a handsome person telling you that you have a bad disease.

        Anyway, vote for climate-positive outcomes wherever possible and consider joining a climate lobbyist group. I’m a member of this one but I’m sure there are others.

        https://citizensclimatelobby.org/

        • milkjug@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          As if all that is not depressing on its own, there just a little less than half of the world that believe it’s a hoax. While they’re being cooked alive. And continue to vote for politicians that perpetuate the idea it’s a hoax.

    • ruford1976@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      what’s worse is that it’s actually 1.6 C

      it says in the article here

      Data released last week from Copernicus, a branch of the European Union Space Programme, shows August was 1.59C warmer than 1850–1900 levels, following a 1.6C increase in July.

      • Sylver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, it’s honestly horrifying to see the lack of reaction around the world. If you live anywhere near the coast, you better get the fuck out or tell your kids to.

        • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s nice by the coast though, I’d just put aquatic pilings under my house and have a ruggedised shelter built into it. Even if I live to a hundred and fifty with all the ice melted my land will still be under less water than the intercoastal platforms we’ve been routinely building since world war one.

    • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      I believe by “interesting,” you mean “moist.” At least, for everyone above/below ±35° latitude.

      Also, I hope you enjoyed photosynthesis while it lasted because once the permafrosts at ±60° latitude thaw, we’re in for a tough time.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have kids. I am fucking livid that the assholes who pretend climate change isn’t happening have decided to sacrifice their kids and mine on the altar of making a quick buck.

    You can’t eat money, assholes. And you can’t bring it with you when you die. If the future is nothing but more and more severe weather to the point that civilization collapses under the strain, then I hope you live long enough to see it and are unable to hide from reality anymore.

  • Rufus Q. Bodine III@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    We had a good run. Good luck to the next species to dominate the earth. May you avoid religious dogma, find an economic system that respects your natural environment, and a political system that respects the right to live a clean and healthy world.

      • theodewere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        we probably taste like shit… they sit around the campfire and remember the good old days of fresh, free range Dino blood as far as the proboscis could poke… not this Walmart meat they get now…

      • Sylver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Depends on how you quantify it. We sure did make a lot of money, or at least the winners did.

      • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        I mean, we left the planet. We created art. We did some good, and life will diversify again after we’re gone.

        • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          and life will diversify again after we’re gone.

          Here’s hoping; but that’s far from a safe assumption. The kicker about the changes we’re making to this planet is that a lot of them are positive feedback loops, so even if 100% of humans just got thanos-snapped out of existence RIGHT NOW, meaning a complete stop on fossil fuel consumption, deforestation, etc; the damage we’ve already caused will continue to get worse on its own with no further input from us.

          So how far can those feedback loops go until they’re broken naturally? They might stabilize; they might just carry on until this planet is molten.

          There will for sure be life after the last human dies, but given a few thousand more years, even the most resilient of critters could still be fucked because of us.

        • jcit878@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          we did just waste a good few million years of evolution though (let’s say 65 million accounting for the rise of mammals). earth isn’t going to be habitable forever, from memory there’s less than a billion years left before the temp would increase with the expanding sun enough to make liquid water impossible. feels like we kind of shot earth in the foot a bit here

          • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            65 million years isn’t that bad on a geologic scale

            As long as there isn’t a runaway greenhouse effect that turns Earth to Venus, life would almost certainly continue, with or without us.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Realistically, extinction would be sweet relief compared to what is actually in store for humans with climate change. More likely that we hang around in smaller communities and death / suffering is even more widespread.

    • Chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I wonder if primates are incapable of building a global economic system that doesn’t end in disaster

  • ViewSonik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yay! I welcome our fiery lava hot summers tbat will eventually boil us alive! Whoohoo! Lets go big oil! Lets go water pollution! Lets go deforestation! Whoooofuckinhooooo!!

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Apart from the voting which is above all else, if you REALLY want to do something on an individual basis, you should reduce your meat or become a vegetarian. It seems that’s what experts claim has the biggest impact. Apart from that, don’t have children, or 2 at most.

      • Bipta@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Please don’t have children. Think about the life you’re condemning them to.

      • Rose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Why vegetarian, not vegan? Cows are a major contributor to the emissions, and people tend to increase their dairy consumption when going vegetarian.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          You seem like more of a mauve hajji, if I’m being honest. You’re definitely a fall.

          See if that rpg comes in teal and ooh girl

          chefs kiss

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Depends on your definition of peaceful. Industrial sabotage that specifically targets unmanned equipment would still be peaceful by my definition, for example.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        This, it’s the only thing that really counts, we all need to pull together, the only way to do that, is to vote in politicians that actually give a shit.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Oh boy not the false equivalence again. If you don’t give a shit yourself then don’t vote.

            It makes a difference who gets the power, and your main influence is your power to vote.

            • Slowy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I always do vote for the party with most proactive views on climate change.

              I just feel really jaded that they are going to make much of a difference, short term capitalistic gains seem more important to all

              Edit - I’m also beginning to feel that voting isn’t my most powerful move. Disruptive protests are looking better and better.

              • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                It may not be the most powerful for all, but for most it is.

                Just don’t go along with something like Just Stop Oil, that’s not constructive or helpful in any way, and it’s off-putting for the vast majority tiring people of the issue, rather than waking their interest.

          • vrojak@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yes, some that really give a shit might not be a part of a major party in whatever country you live in, but even among established parties there are people who are more inclined to do something about the climate catastrophe than others.

    • genoxidedev1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      Honestly, I’m pretty sure the deficit we could create on an individual basis will just be used by companies instead, so I’m just gonna agree with the others on voting being the most effective method of making a difference.

    • darq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      As others have said, voting is important. But also I’d guess that direct action will play a large role in the next few decades.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    We did it! 🎉🎊

    Just goes to show what we can accomplish when, as a species, we put our minds to a goal.

    2.5c here we come!

  • TsarVul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Writing is firmly on the wall, gang. All I see is patch notes for the wars for arable land meta.

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    They need to disclose their high tech stuff so we can finally replace petrol/diesel/kerosene and start saving the planet. I wish i could do more.