Federal immigration officers are asserting sweeping power to forcibly enter people’s homes without a judge’s warrant, according to an internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated Press, marking a sharp reversal of longstanding guidance meant to respect constitutional limits on government searches.

The memo authorizes ICE officers to use force to enter a residence based solely on a more narrow administrative warrant to arrest someone with a final order of removal, a move that advocates say collides with Fourth Amendment protections and upends years of advice given to immigrant communities.

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Surely it will work, right? All those school shootings and accidental murders, they were for this. To stand up to tyranny. Surely Americans won’t just roll over/cheer like they always do. Surely not. Lmao

      • finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I just hope they don’t go too hard with the tweets and protests! They’re getting results! And democratic senators writing letters! Oof!

        /s

        (I support the protesters, the ICE victims, and NOT ICE, but day after day it just gets worse, and that’s all they’re doing - tweeting and marching - as ICE commit atrocity after atrocity).

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      We already know how. It won’t.

      Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

      When ingroups do it, its castle doctrine. When outgroups do it its terrorism. There is no law in the US. Just an uncivilized savage land now.

    • bdot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      well - considering the “assassination attempt” on Trump, and how anyone speaking against the regime is a “domestic terrorist,” my money is on the idea that very soon there will be some ICE agents that have an encounter with “ANTIFA thugs,” and this is where martial law will be declared.

      Trump is insane right now, and he is big mad that he’s not getting his way in Switzerland; he’s getting bullied right back, and he’s starting to see that people are laughing at him.

      • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        If that was the goal it would’ve been false flagged already. The goal really is just a simple as they don’t think their actions will have consequences, and so far they’ve been largely correct.

    • zib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      The legal side of it would probably be unfairly weighted in ICE’s favor, but I suspect if they tried this in a place like Texas, by the time it got to court, those frozen water nazis would already be shot the hell up.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I expect that within a few months you’ll find NICS checks returning “DENY” for anyone who has ties to terrorism. The evidence of terrorism will be membership in things ike the ACLU, being a registered Democrat, having a reading level of 8th-grade or higher, etc.

    • You need the other document

      When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

      when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

      (Hey, It’s not illegal to quote the nation’s founders, right? 👀)

      Edit: Btw I remember this was required class material… must be awkward for the highschoolers of current times lol

    • PhatalFlaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sir, this is a Wendy’s Minnesota. There’s no castle doctrine, but rather a duty to retreat.

      • Nate Cox@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        I could absolutely be wrong about this because I’ve never really looked it up, but I thought “duty to retreat” still allowed use of lethal force once there is nowhere left to retreat (for example, once in your own home).

        Part of those pesky “inalienable rights”.

      • Pavidus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        I understand, however in the article it states “The shift comes as the Trump administration dramatically expands immigration arrests nationwide…”

        There’s a reason this started in areas such as Minnesota. I fully believe this is just trial runs and laying the (il)legal framework to handle more difficult areas.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          “Nationwide” is sanewashing. It’s really expanding specifically to blue states (because its real purpose is punishing the regime’s political enemies).

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Next they’ll be breaking into churches and schools, watch for it. Churches used to be considered off-limits, but I’m betting they are only off-limits in the bible belt, not the rest of the country.

  • hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Trump previously: “Take the guns first, go through due process second.” (actual quote)

    Trump today: “Take the homes first, go through due process second.”

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Trump today: “Take the homes first, go through due process second.”

      There is no evidence for the second half of that.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m pretty sure that has the same enforceability legal standing as ICE saying its legal for them to shoot anyone anywhere for any reason.