Federal immigration officers are asserting sweeping power to forcibly enter people’s homes without a judge’s warrant, according to an internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated Press, marking a sharp reversal of longstanding guidance meant to respect constitutional limits on government searches.
The memo authorizes ICE officers to use force to enter a residence based solely on a more narrow administrative warrant to arrest someone with a final order of removal, a move that advocates say collides with Fourth Amendment protections and upends years of advice given to immigrant communities.
Castle doctrine says otherwise.
Sir, this is
a Wendy’sMinnesota. There’s no castle doctrine, but rather a duty to retreat.I could absolutely be wrong about this because I’ve never really looked it up, but I thought “duty to retreat” still allowed use of lethal force once there is nowhere left to retreat (for example, once in your own home).
Part of those pesky “inalienable rights”.
Look, if I’m on that jury I’m not convicting you if nazis break down your door and you start defending yourself
I understand, however in the article it states “The shift comes as the Trump administration dramatically expands immigration arrests nationwide…”
There’s a reason this started in areas such as Minnesota. I fully believe this is just trial runs and laying the (il)legal framework to handle more difficult areas.
“Nationwide” is sanewashing. It’s really expanding specifically to blue states (because its real purpose is punishing the regime’s political enemies).
Incorrect. Minnesota has a castle doctrine for defending your home, a duty to retreat in public.