• stevestevesteve@lemmy.world
    1203·
    2 months ago

    “well baby snoop it’s called adoption” as if they’d have a problem explaining little orphan Annie or Stuart little or any number of adopted children

  • acchariya@lemmy.world
    78·
    2 months ago

    Yes, a cartoon lesbian couple is highly inappropriate for the grandson of a drug huffing, ho banging gangster.

    • Karjalan@lemmy.world
      414·
      2 months ago

      While his take here is shitty, I think doing drugs and having sex with women for money is not something that warrants out right condemnation imo.

      His involvement in murder and assault, and the sexual assault and battery accusations are much more damming and legit reasons to shit on him though.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        121·
        2 months ago

        Broadly it might not be worthy of condemnation, but in the context of “child appropriate” it would seem to be way less appropriate than what he is complaining about.

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          2·
          2 months ago

          I think Snoop is being a dumbass here (like I did when he went to Trump’s inauguration party) but this is a bad argument. He didn’t make the music for young children.

  • MisterMoo@lemmy.worldEnglish
    641·
    2 months ago

    Upvoting for awareness of what a snowflake Snoop is and in the hopes we can get past the “awww he and Martha Stewart are best buds” era.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    45·
    2 months ago

    I hate this argument. “You people can’t exist in public because I might have to talk to my stupid kids”.

  • RattlerSix@lemmy.worldEnglish
    361·
    2 months ago

    It’s wild to me that someone who got rich selling songs to teens about fucking bitches, selling drugs and killing cops could keep a straight have (edit: face! Straight face!) while saying he’s offended about anything.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      6·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, what a soft ass human being. Soft constitution (lack of integrity) and soft morals make for a pathetic excuse for a human being.

  • x4740N@lemmy.world
    314·
    2 months ago

    Is there a credible source of evidence that “Snoop Dogg” actually said this?

    If he actually said this then he’s a horrible fucking human being but I don’t like accusing someone of doing something horrible without evidence

    I’ve already seen it happen to people online and false accusations can ruin lives and it can be hard to repair that life after its been ruined

    I’ve never heard of this claim apart from this image

    EDIT:

    Looked at a few comments with links to articles and have only skimmed through 2 so far but yeah he’s a piece of fucking shit

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    272·
    2 months ago

    Right because lesbians should only exist in pornos (like the GGW ones Snoop promoted at one point). Definitely not in real life, right Snoop?

    Fucks sake, we can’t depict two people in love because you can’t explain it to your grandson? Should we not depict space travel or is he a rocket scientist that we don’t know about?

  • Zink@programming.dev
    261·
    2 months ago

    My son just started third grade. It is actually super easy to answer questions like this if you’re a kind person who allows others to keep their humanity if they are different, and if you actually cultivate a relationship with your child.

    Explaining how two women parent a child? Wow, that must be tough my snoop guy. Better to just hide from the public like a little bitch, as you might say.

    I mean, I’ve had to address things like the topic of death because of a grandparent dying young and a future sibling ending in a miscarriage. And the original due date recently passed too. oof.

    But thank fucking god that in my family’s weakened state, none of us were assaulted by the vile image of two women holding hands and kissing a baby on the head at the same time.

    Check this out though Dogg: if you were sent back 50 years in time with white skin and no memory, within a week you’d be fighting to bring back segregation. Cunt.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    231·
    2 months ago

    He made adult music knowing it would be listened to by children. At some point in his career he must have realized he was talking directly to children while in the studio.

    I’m sure he cares about kids and isn’t just a stupid asshole saying a line because something pulled his string.

    ~You got a stick in your ass, Snoop!~

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      6·
      2 months ago

      He made adult music knowing it would be listened to by children.

      Snoop deserves criticism for this and his Trump inauguration appearance, but this is a deeply stupid criticism that can be made about literally any entertainer.

      • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        2 months ago

        Essentially he was. This is him saying I have no moral threshold and am available as an influencer to say and do whatever I am paid for. AKA I am still relevant to your agenda… Call me. It is the same as all the big tech CEOs bending to 47 after bending to diversity initiatives. People with no ethics or morals fly the banner of whomever has control and do so in ways the average person is far too stupid to process. 47 is hard pressed for black and minority supporters. For a leader of dogmatic tribal fools, aka an influencer, the vacuum of minority supporters for 47 is an open bounty for a very large paycheck in exchange for ethics especially in the Southeastern USA where any sway over potential Democratic voters is critical for the fascist republican agenda. Nothing is simple or straight forward when a person is at this level of political engagement and wealth.