Considering how crazy expensive accommodations have become the last couple of years, concentrated in the hands of greedy corporations, landlords and how little politicians seem to care about this problem, do you think we will ever experience a real estate market crash that would bring those exorbitant prices back to Earth?

  • Cheesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    No, unless we separate housing from investment, it will never be affordable. I don’t foresee the political will to make it happen.

  • MossBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I honestly think were heading for a total societal collapse. If the people with power and resources were the sort that were inclined to use it for good, they would have done it already. Given that we haven’t seen this, it’s reasonable that this accumulation at the top will continue unabated and that more and more people will fall into poverty and despair.

    This is a recipe for revolution, and revolution is largely incompatible with stability, especially in the near term.

    I wish this wasn’t the case. I suspect this century’'s deaths will dwarf last century’s.

    • Bye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      No way, I think we are going to find out that circus is more important than bread, very soon. When people start needing to eat expired food and bugs, they won’t revolt as long as they have TikTok etc.

  • who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not without some real force or change, middle class has invested to much of their retirement into the housing market to allow the prices to tank. Those who have are not going to risk it for the have nots.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Imagine storing all of your nation’s wealth in real estate that is actively decaying by the minute instead of into companies that make products and provide jobs. What a stupid fucking idea.

  • ThisIsMyLemmyLogin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    No. As the effects of climate change become worse, people will migrate to cooler places, which will only push up prices in those places. Poor people will be left to live in uninhabitable and uninsurable areas, while the rich will get to live in comfort.

    Climate change is essentially a class struggle, like everything else in life. As long as the 1% don’t have to suffer, nothing will be done. To get the rich to do something about climate change, it will have to affect them directly.

    • DarkWasp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I also think in addition to what you mentioned people don’t want to address that the population is a problem as well. The earth more than doubled the people living on it in 70 years from all of human history, that’s not just sustainable. You can hypothetically fit 20 people in a one bedroom but just because you can doesn’t mean you should.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      limate change is essentially a class struggle, like everything else in life. As long as the 1% don’t have to suffer, nothing will be done. To get the rich to do something about climate change, it will have to affect them directly.

      Exactly this. Elysium comes to mind, altough it won’t be a space station in orbit but probably a densely populated blue zone in Western Antarctica defended by turret boats or some shit.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m in a hot climate and it’s far more expensive here than it is in cooler parts of the country, and it continues to be that way. Your hypothesis would be for the distant future, but that’s not what’s driving costs right now and in the immediate future.

      • IsThisWhereWeGoNow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Sure, but the premise of the question is if “we will ever have affordable housing again in our lifetime?” There is no reason to believe there will be affordable housing right now or in the immediate future, and this comment hypothesises why climate change will cause affordable housing to continue to be problematic in the distant future as well.

  • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    The solution is simple, but will never happen. Make it illegal to own a home you don’t live in.

    • randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      What about apartments? Dorms? Would that make being homeless illegal?

      Canada banned foreign ownership, and a bunch of local shell companies popped up. So it is not as simple as it sounds.

      • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you don’t live in the building and it’s for permanent accomodation, you don’t own any part of it. Very simple. Feel free to rent out part of the building though if you do.

        Whatever mental gymnastics you did to get from there to homelessness being illegal don’t apply.

        • randon31415@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          |Make it illegal to own a home you don’t live in -> Feel free to rent out part of the building though if you do.

          Wouldn’t renting out a building you don’t live in be illegal? Or is AirBnB a loophole?

          • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Wouldn’t renting out a building you don’t live in be illegal

            Yes. That’s the point. You can own it if it’s your residence even if someone else lives there too.

            Also you don’t seem to comprehend the concept of bed and breakfast

            • randon31415@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              So the only apartments in this brave new world would have the landlords literally living in them with you. That doesn’t sound like an upgrade to me.

              • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                Your grasp of the distinction between apartment and building is as abysmal as every other concept you mention.

                Also you seem to be equally ignorant of the idea of owning an apartment and of social housing.

                • randon31415@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Ah, you are just a common troll. Got it. I was a bit tired, so I fed you after midnight. Won’t make that mistake again. Good night.

    • Hikermick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is so stupid. The fact that people upvote this makes me want to go back to reddit

      • Hikermick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think the people here are young and well meaning but don’t have much real world experience yet.

  • NathanielThomas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The opposite. I think home ownership will gradually seep away and only corporations will own houses. We’ll all basically rent small hovels from multinationals or it’ll be a package of the company we work for, like the dystopian show Severance.

  • BossPaint@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is kind of just something that krept into my mind but I think with a slowing birthrate that we may just end up with too many homes at some point in the next 25 years.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If you’re talking about the US, the slowing birthrate is compensated for by immigration. This is what drives immigration policy and why the US hasn’t fallen into the same demographic slump as Japan has, and China soon will.

      Add to this that much of the tight housing market is driven by people around the world investing in US real estate. Some estimates are as high as 30% of homes sitting empty, held by foreign investors, just appreciating.

      Between these two things, we are extremely far from being able to visualize too much housing. I hope we get there, though. Because it would fix the high pricing and allow us to demolish some of the oldest, shittiest housing which is only still around because the market is so nuts.

    • u_tamtam@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Perhaps, but in an energy-scarce world, who would be able to afford living in an old, inefficient house? I obviously hope to be wrong but increasing material price and labour might alone offset whatever price decrease the extra inventory of a decreasing population might bring. I hope to be wrong, ofc.

      • Urbanfox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        My old place was a cold, stone cottage and was a nightmare to keep heated.

        The kitchen at one point was measuring 6°C and that was with the heating on in the winter.

        We got out of there in December 2019 and I’m so glad we did, because with COVID, Brexit and the war, house prices went bananas, energy bills went through the roof and interest rates have increased massively.

        We could never have afforded this place today. I really feel for young folks today, we bought our first home at 33 years old after years of saving and that was in the time of almost no interest - it would be impossible now.

  • fabio1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    I bought an apartment about 15 years ago. I finally finished paying it about 3 years ago, and recently got an offer to move to Ontario. With the current house prices and what I was offered there (about 80k), I could barely make rent for my family. I really wanted to move but had to say no because of stupid absurd rent prices. What’s weird is that if I wanted to rent the place I bought I would not be able to afford it either. This is bullshit.

  • elscallr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah but the market is going to have to absolutely tank first. There’s a lot of money in that bubble, and it’s going to be fucking painful when it does. But it’ll get there.

    • DosCommas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      When it tanks people would be laid off and have no money for houses. Basically 2007 all over again. The rich would swoop up all the cheap real estate.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        And the cycle would repeat a-fucking-gain, with the poor wanting silly things like owning their own land or homes and decent living wages being blamed for the next burst bubble

  • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The problem is not affordable housing, there’s plenty of that in the US, the problem is getting people to states where housing is affordable without significant drops in quality of life due to lack of access to services and such.

    Like, you could buy land in Detroit for the price of a decent car, put a trailer on it and you’re already on the property ladder, but you’re in Detroit.

  • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    After the climate mass deaths, migrations and/or wars, there should be plenty of land.

    Although it might not be habitable.

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    I suspect that a strong push for fully remote work would help the US with housing costs due to a chunk of the workforce moving out of the cities and into the boonies.

  • Pat12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    No. With climate change more land will be unlivable, there will be more conflicts and more immigration (legal and illegal). Housing will increase because demand is high and supply will shrink further b

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    No. Not because of overpopulation or such, but because the powers that be have simply discovered how lucrative it is to use housing as a business investment, and the fact that everyone NEEDS housing, no exceptions.

    This is essentially a supply problem, so the “supply side” of this equation is the side with all the power. The end.

    • sarchar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      No. Not because of overpopulation, but because the central bank is devaluing the currency. That transfers wealth from all of us and gives it to TPTB.

    • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, birth rate is steadily dropping. As people die the housing market could change. There are free houses in rural Japan because their population has been declining and young folks all moved to the cities. In 30-50 years we could see something similar.

      • set_secret@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        you’re not factoring in catastrophic climate change into your equation. in 30 to 50 years much of the equatorial regions will ne unlivable. massive levels of climate refuges will be shifting. we’re seeing unlivable wet bulb temps TODAY. so this isn’t catastrophising. it’s an almost certainty at this juncture.

        • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          I dunno, I try not to worry about these things to much. I’m not having kids I do what I can to live a low carbon footprint life. Not really anything I can do about it. Thinking about moving somewhere cooler with more solid natural water access incase of societal collapse… I like to garden and preserve shit anyway.

          • set_secret@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            That’s honestly the best you can do at this point. individual change is really limited when industry is like 85% of the issue. I try and do the same. grow my own food, drive an ev powered by solar panels, don’t eat meat etc. but it really feels futile when it’s a drop in the ocean as far as impact goes.