• arrakark@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    13 days ago

    LOL. If you have to buy your customers to get them to use your product, maybe you aren’t offering a good product to begin with.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      13 days ago

      That stood out to me too. This is effectively the investor class coercing use of AI, rather than how tech has worked in the past, driven by ground-up adoption.

      • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        That’s not what this is. They find profitable businesses and replace employees with Ai and pocket the spread. They aren’t selling the Ai

        • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          They’re rent seeking douchbags who don’t add value to shit. If there was ever an advertisement for full on vodka and cigarettes for breakfast bolshevism it’s these assholes.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      There is another major reason to do it. Businesses are often in multi year contracts with call center solutions, and a lot of call center solutions have technical integrations with a business’ internal tooling.

      Swapping out a solution requires time and effort for a lot of businesses. If you’re selling a business on an entirely new vendor, you have to have a sales team hunting for businesses that are at a contract renewal period, you have to lure them with professional services to help with implementation, etc.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Plenty of good, non-AI technologies out there that businesses are just slow or just don’t have the budget to adopt.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 days ago

    bunch of greedy fucks.

    greed should be a registered mental illness that’s no different than OCD, schizophrenia, or PTSD.

    1000001574

    • doodledup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Everyone is greedy. It’s just rational maximization of profits. You do too. Or would you want to voluntarily waive parts of your salary?

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 days ago

        No, most people do not seek out competitor businesses (or even businesses in other sectors like in this case) so they can fire all the human workers in the hope of making more money.

        Non-tax-deductable donations are a voluntary waiver of salary. Most people have ethics and a conscience, its just the greedy minority that fuck it up for the community-minded majority.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s just rational maximization of profits.

        No, it really isn’t. It is rational to consider all upsides and downsides (profit just being one) of a decision and then weigh them according to your own personal priorities before trying to achieve an optimal result. This very rarely results in profits being the only priority.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        would you want to voluntarily waive parts of your salary?

        Yes, I tend to vote for increased taxes to invest in education, environment, social welfare. And yes, that includes progressive taxes that hit me harder (as long as that also applies to the wealthy), and vice taxes that target my vices

        • doodledup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          In the meantime ask your boss for a lower salary so your company can make more profits.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Hopefully you can see the difference between working for someone else profit, vsinvestments in all of our well being and a more fair tax structure

            • doodledup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              So there is levels to greediness? You can call for higher taxes to have your conscience clear so you can be greedy elsewhere?

              Everyone is greedy. Nobody wants less income if it affects their quality of life.

              • AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                True, but there’s no reason that can’t coexist with a sense of fairness, and witha long term greater good

                Of course I don’t want to pay more taxes. However I realize I’ve been more successful than some, and a more progressive tax scheme is fair. I realize I have vices and don’t mind if there is a discouragement, as long as it applies to everyone fairly. I realize my success is based on a successful society and understand it is only fair to leave society in at least as good condition as I found it. Most importantly I have kids so I’m all for building a better future for them …. And understand that includes the society they will live in, the environment they will live in

    • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      Isn’t that what we call “Innovation” in our capitalist society?

      You build a thing. Pour your blood sweat and tears into it. Some VC goon buys it during a downturn. They fire most of the staff. Strip the copper out of the walls. Make the service shittier and shittier until all that is left is its faltering brand recognition then sell it all for a bundle to the very next sucker they can?

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        Innovation is enshittification these days. It used to be invention, where entirely new products and materials came about. Then there was innovation, incremental improvement coupled with price hikes. Now “innovation” seems strictly rearranging deck chairs with worse service, and reducing employee count for increased profits.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I am so glad I got out of IT before AI hit. I don’t know how I would have handled customer calls asking why our chat is telling them their shit works when it doesn’t or to cover their computer in cooking oils or whatever.

    And only after they banged their head against the AI for two hours and are already pissed will they reach someone. No thanks.

    Thank god I can troubleshoot on my own.

    • tauisgod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 days ago

      When VC and PE call a company or industry “mature” it means they don’t see increasing revenue, only something to be sucked dry and sold for parts. To them, consistent revenue is worthless, it must be skyrocketing or nothing. If you want to see this in action right now, look what Broadcom is doing to VMWare. They also saw VMWare as a “mature company”.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 days ago

    “What if we threw a ton of money after the absolute shit ton of money we threw away?”

  • m_xy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    Necessity is the mother of invention and capitalism is its drunk abusive stepfather

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Ohh no. Please don’t destroy call centers. What will we do without them. Ohh the humanity.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 days ago

      Good luck calling your bank, social security, healthcare, DMV, IRS, etc with the obscure problems we all have, if they’re a poorly trained chatbot

    • sunbytes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      They’re not going away, they’re just going to be more persistent with their cold calling, and more infuriating with their call answering.

    • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      I had an issue with some equipment from ATT, it took about 6 different try’s before I finally found a human capable enough to help resolve my issue, which involved replacing the equipment.

      This future sounds so much worse to fix a complicated issue.