The state’s ban on gender-affirming pediatric care “cannot be justified” by science, a two-year review concluded.
They forgot to rig it.
But seriously, the response is disgusting. This is a report you requested, using experts seeking genuine truth. The goal was to improve lives and understand the effects of treatment. There are ethical reasons one could reject a report saying it’s not good, namely bodily autonomy and individual freedom, but when the evidence comes back that you shouldn’t restrict this individual freedom, that’s pretty heinous to do so.
You forgot the tiny detail that their feelings don’t care about facts.
Facts don’t care about their feelings, but their feelings don’t care about facts either.
Who would you rather believe, my man-made book about our magical friend in the sky or some stupid data driven peer reviewd scientific study?
I mean, it isn’t as though politicians are above fabricating a bunch of medicalized Trans bigotry. The UK’s Cass Report is one such example.
What’s amazing is that Utah’s researchers did the leg work properly, rather than conducting a series of FOX News style interviews and Steven Crowder inspired trolling.
Someone should force Keir Starmer and the UK Government to read this report. They have been bad but they may not be quite as far gone as the Republicans.
Wait Nazis aren’t rational and just?
Well they more I hear about them, the less I like em.
Since when did Republicans give a rats ass about science?
In the off-chance it doesn’t totally disprove them.
“hey we didn’t say anything about science… did you guys order the wrong kind of study? i meant like bible study”
Good job there’s more than 20 other studies out there for them to p-hack
