cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29061644

We’ve done it, we got rid of another soulless right wing politician!

Peter Dutton first made his party lose this election and now also lost his own seat much like Pierre Pullover

We’ve still got a government that green-lit new coal power plants in it’s last term, screwed over the Aboriginal community with a poorly run referendum, and still doesn’t give a shit about climate change, but baby steps hey.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    We have a basic rule that the headline must match the article. Current headline reads:

    “Peter Dutton to leave Coalition leaderless, conceding he has lost his seat of Dickson”

    I’ll give you a fair shot to correct it before just removing it.

    • kingofras@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Done. Only because I respect you.

      It doesn’t make sense that rule. But you’ll disagree anyway and there’s never a chance of winning a mod argument anyway.

      The article headline you want is pointless and meaningless to the 99% of the world who visits this.

      Peter Dutton to leave Coalition leaderless, conceding he has lost his seat of Dickson

      I added context and a little bit of juice to it so it would make for a better headline for non-Australians. Did I add some anti Trump sentiment? Sure. Did that misconstrue the content of the article? No.

      I understand the current rule makes it easy to mod the place, but it also means you don’t let the OP add context for Lemmy. The rule should be: you can’t misconstrue the content of the article.

      Anyway, I appreciate all you mods do and I respect the rules that are in place.

    • PagPag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just remove it.

      People who do this shit are actively making this place worse.

  • boughtmysoul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    While I’m extremely happy about the election results, let’s not forget that the Conservatives were on track to sweep before Trump shit the bed so badly that the entire world had to hold its nose.

  • altasshet@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The Canadian cons didn’t actually boot Polievre, instead they’re giving him an easy to win riding and a brand new seat in parliament so he can stay on. Which probably means he’ll stick around and win the next election. I hate it.

    Edit: autocorrect

      • piskertariot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s about 3 seconds of googling to find out that there will be byelection in Battle River-Crowfoot, which went 81.8% in favour of the Conservative candidate. Polievre will run there, get swept in, and pretend that he represents Canadians.

      • PixelProf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not op but https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-to-run-in-alberta-byelection-1.7525104

        Basically he asked a con in the highest % of con votes to step down to trigger a by-election. It’s an area where the other parties don’t even campaign, they just hand it to the cons.

        There are already talks of “liberals rigged the election” so that he can deflect and not make it a personal failing that he lost a riding that’s historically always been conservative and lost a 25 point lead in the polls in a few months.

        • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          What even is the point of “representing your district” if they could just nominate a random person from across the country that never before stepped foot in that district?

          • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            Welcome to Canadian Parliamentary politics, where every good step forward has an equal and opposite step backwards.

            While I still prefer it to the alternative system to the south; where it’s all bad steps. I’d be lying if I said our own system was perfect by any means.

          • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Carney could deny the by-election or at least delay it, but that’d cause conservative tears so he’s avoiding the drama.

        • kingofras@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh god… We had Jacinta Pryce (extreme right winger in Oz) try the same here tonight. How do they expect this to work? I suppose because it worked for Diaper Don…

      • altasshet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sorry, didn’t check back until now, but looks like it got sourced in the meantime.

    • fleet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ya, and also the conservatives lost by 1% of the popular vote, and had excellent numbers overall. I really wish we kicked them to the curb, but that’s hardly the case. Sounds like Australia did a much better job.

      • altasshet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s exactly what makes me believe they will win next time with little effort. Unless the LPC delivers big, people are not going to vote “anything but conservative” again.

        If Carney is smart, he actually pushes for proportional representation. It would save the liberals next election, all the smaller parties would be on board, and even if he gets ousted after, he would have secured his place in the history books (not sure how susceptible he is to appeals to his vanity…)

    • Jack_Burton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I dunno, I’d like to try to be hopeful. The NDP has a real shot to completely rebrand and come back swinging. Convince Charlie Angus to come out of retirement and lead the party, and spend the next however-long-this-term-lasts rebuilding support. I can’t think of a better outcome than having to Sophie’s Choice between Carney and Angus. Imagine having to choose between 2 legitimately good party leaders.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      The good news is that the riding he has to run in is incredibly rural. He’s going to hate it.

      Poilievre is a city boy. He grew up in the Calgary suburbs. Then he moved to Ottawa to become an MP. The only job he’s ever had involving physical exertion is when he was a paperboy as a kid. Now he’s going to have to spend some time in his new riding surrounded by farmers. The biggest “city” there has a population under 20k. Everything else is towns, villages and hamlets. Assuming he buys a house in Camrose, if he wants Thai food, he’ll have to drive over an hour to get to Edmonton.

      Maybe because the conservatives have such an overwhelming majority in Battle River - Crowfoot, they won’t care that he’s a carpetbagger and he won’t have to put much effort in there. But, I think eventually he’ll have to spend some time in his riding, and it will be a major culture clash.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Almost the exact playbook as in Canada. Except it’s a close minority here. But the Maple Maggot, after losing his own seat, has decided to take over another MP’s seat in a by-election.

      • ibelieveinthehousehippo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I know the chances are very, very slim, but I’d love to see the people of Battle-River-Crowfoot vote ABC and make that little weiner lose again.

        There are so many hilarious opportunities with this by-election.

        -91 candidates run and he comes in 91st

        -Trudeau also runs there and wins

        -He runs, loses, and repeats the process until the Liberals have a majority

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Trudeau might be the first candidate to ever achieve a negative number of votes if he ran in Crowfoot.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The riding he’s chosen to run in is one of the most conservative in the country. The guy who’s stepping down won something like 80% of the vote.

          But, the Liberals should run someone who actually lives in that riding and keeps reminding the voters there that Poilievre doesn’t live there and doesn’t know anything about his new riding. It won’t be enough to keep him from winning this time, but there’s a chance that over time it will start to matter to voters that their MP doesn’t live there and knows nothing about their riding.

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          He runs, loses, and repeats the process until the Liberals have a majority

          No repetition necessary. The Liberals are one seat away from a majority.

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Mot really, Labor did nothing over the last 3 years and get rewarded for that as well as Greens losing a few seats.

      Best case scenario was minority Labor gov shared with the Greens.

  • Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Foreign elections being won based on real opposition to Trump and those that style themselves after him. Democrats can do this, but it means they would have to stop trying to make deals with nazis.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bravo to the Australian voters. However, you should have purchased the submarines from the French.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    YISSSSS congratulations !! Pierre pull-over. I am gonna steal this.

    Love it.

    For anyone needing how to actually pronounce this douche canoe’s name is Peepeepoopoo as we say in liberal Canada