Now I understand why at each windows 11 update, they introduce more bugs than ever

  • krimson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    188
    ·
    2 months ago

    Horseshit.

    The current state of code generated by AI is sketchy at best. I often get plain wrong answers because the model tries to derive. It comes up with calls to functions and properties that just do not exist.

    “You are right, I made a mistake. Here is a better answer.” Continues to give wrong answers.

    Apart from that, apps that are glued together from AI generated code are not maintainable at all. What if there is a bug somewhere and you so not comprehend what is actually happening? Ask AI to fix it? Yeah good luck with that.

    I do use AI for simple questions, and it works fairly well for that, but this claim by MS is just marketing bullshit.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      2 months ago

      This ^

      “20%-30% of code inside the company’s repositories”

      Now, if they had said “20%-30% of code written in the past 6 months…” I might buy that.

      The repositories are going to have all the current codebase, likely going back years now. AI generated code is barely viable at this point and really only pretty recently.

      No way 1/3rd of all current codebase is AI.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 months ago

        Even 20% of new code would be a stretch unless they count every first iteration of code written by AI that needs to be replaced by a human later because it was plain wrong.

    • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      “You are right, I made a mistake. Here is a better answer.” Continues to give wrong answers

      The exact same wrong answer. Co-Pilot is especially bad for that. I’m practically giving up using it outside of vs code because the actual copilot AI is dog shit stupid m

  • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    He used the words “written by software”. This is ambiguous and doesn’t mean AI, for example, using annotations for variables and generating the getters and setters would count. Right click and create function body for interface function definitions also.

    They’re exaggerating to pretend their AI is more useful than it is.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    Power move by the zucc by first asking how much genai is used at Microsoft then refusing to answer his own question at Facebook 😂

  • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Everybody saying this is why their products are shit are really confusing me. It’s not like Microsoft just started being terrible. They’ve been terrible for a real long time. Way before AI was a thing. This is just a symptom of Microsoft’s awfulness not a reason for it.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      There were alpha versions of windows 8 with less glaring/annoying bugs than windows 11, though

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Windows 11 is so terrible so far that if I’ll need to use Windows 10 for dev reasons, I’ll either pirate the extended support patches, or use a shitbox (obsolete PC for optimization purposes) disconnected from the internet. I do fear that I might have to hack a GUI onto LDB or GDB, because I got too used to RemedyBG (I’m already using Kate).

    • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The AI is not the reason their software is bad, but their software is bad for the same reason they’re claiming to use AI to write it.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    If they mean “30% of the code we wrote last month” then I might believe it. Though I bet it is not across the board but deep in one or two areas. Still, it’s a crazy number.

    But he said something like “30% of the code in our repositories” which would mean everything, including their entire legacy of code. And that I simply do not believe.

    • Womble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Its a shit article with Tech crunch changing the words to get people in a flap about AI (for or against), the actual quote is

      “I’d say maybe 20 percent, 30 percent of the code that is inside of our repos today and some of our projects are probably all written by software”

      “Written by software” reasonably included machine refactored code, automatically generated boilerplate and things generated by AI assistants. Through that lens 20% doesnt seem crazy.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It wouldn’t surprise me at all if they entered the entire codebase for Windows 11 into an LLM and asked it to optimize it or some shit lol

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I bet they’re counting code written while someone had an AI plugin installed as “written by AI” and I bet that accounts for almost all of that 30%. On top of that, I’m betting that they made it mandatory to have such a plug in, and the other 70% is just code written before they mandated this.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would be very surprised if 30% of their code lines had even been touched at all by anyone since AI coding assistants became a thing.

      • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I could see stuff getting small changes and them claiming that the entirety of the new version is “written by AI”.

    • SandmanXC@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also, having 1/3 lines with obvious code that can be auto suggested correctly would make sense, but that is hardly code “written by ai” in the way they suggest.

      • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d guess a lot of the people writing the code don’t even have it turned on, it’s just installed because management said it had to be, because management wants to be able to tell investors they’re “innovating work flows”.

        • Balder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I am a small sample to confirm that’s exactly the reason in my brother’s company.

          And in my company we’re pressured to make X prompts every week to the company’s own ChatGPT wrapper to show we’re being productive. Even our profit shares have a KPO attached to that now. So many people just type “Hello there” every morning to count as another interaction with the AI.

    • Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      What? There products have long been shit ever before AI was even a thing.

      Anyone remember windows ME? I sure as fuck do.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m still forced to use Microsoft Outlook and teams, unfortunately, and boy oh boy is it bad.

    Yesterday i spent 45 minutes of a 1,5 meeting (that would have been 45 minutes) on trying teams to please try and use the right microphone, please share a screen (not working under Firefox or chrome now, apparently)

    I can’t wait for the day that I have some time to get us off that dog shit

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Outlook is pretty damned bullet proof, Teams, OTOH, is a fucking mess. I can see IT wanting to keep everything in the same ecosystem, that’s perfectly sane, but I’m certain Zoom can be setup to honor AD credentials. We set it to use Google SSO.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Outlook…

        Ok

        Pretty solid

        Bahaha hahahahaha

        Sorry.

        Outlook is a lot of things. “Gooey crap” would be one way to describe it, but “solid”? Yeah, no. Gmail is (well, was) pretty solid. There are a lot of other webmail providers out there, including self hosted options and most are pretty solid, yeah. Outlook, though? It’s a shit show, it’s annoying.

        Do you love me? Please love me, please give feedback, please give feedback again, please look at this, hey am I the best? Am I…

        STFU YOU PIECE OF CRAP! Can you PLEASE just let me do my email without being an attention whore every hour?

        Even down to the basics. Back button? “What is that? Never heard of it, can’t go back to the message I just was on because I’m Microsoft software and so half baked.”

        Having two tabs open? “Oh noes, now I get scawed, now I don’t know how to manage sessions anymore, better just sign you out everywhere.” What is it with Microsoft and not being able to do something basic as sessions normal? I’m not even asking for good, definitely not “awesome”, just normal, and that is already too much to ask.

        Try running it in Firefox! I’m sure it’s totally not on purpose, just “oopsie woopsie poopsie” accidentally bwoken. Maybe it’s working again today, who knows, tomorrow it’ll be broken again. I run everything on Firefox except the Microsoft sites, they have to be in chrome because fuck you, that’s why.

        Seriously, I can’t take any Microsoft software seriously at this point, and all of it is on its way out in our company, I’m making sure of that

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Code written by software doesn’t mean AI unless you ignore compilers

    Executives lie to boost profits and justify their decisions, I doubt MS execs even know how much of their code is AI generated just like the ad sales company exec they were talking to in the article

  • Bieren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Work for a big software company. With all the offshoring of devs, I expect most of our code is now AI. And it shows.

      • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Quality degredation and Disjointed experience comes to minds. Microsofts tech is such a mess right now i dont know how they come back from it honestly. Too many competing frameworks, bad schemas, broken tooling, bad documentation.

        Im not even factoring in windows 11.

        I used to be a windows dev guy, but with this landscape I dunno why i would do it to myself. Developing for linux systens is such a better experience. At least there are standards and ubernerds who adhere to them.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Coming back from this is easy.

          Extend support for windows 10 for another 4 years. Take a break from their OS release cycle and get the next OS right. Remove the Microsoft account mandate from sign in. Remove AI by default. Remove Ads, weather, news and other bloat from the OS. The focus should be creating the cleanest, simplest, abstraction between the user and the hardware.

          • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Its not nearly that easy. They are dealing with personalities behind all of this, investors they made promises to, etc. What you are describing is the right thing to do, its just very complicated with a ship as big as microsoft to turn on a dime like that. The bigger the org, the slower it is to react and the harder it is to course correct

  • sqibkw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Windows hate train looks fun, but as someone who works in the industry, most of that code is probably just unit tests and boilerplate stuff.

    Copilot is decent at quickly writing huge amounts of mostly correct, tedious unit test code, depending on your language/framework. And since Microsoft works with languages like C# and .NET for their native apps, and likely backend too, there is quite a bit of verbosity that Copilot can take care of. Also, documentation might count as well.

    No real code is AI-generated. He’s just saying shit like this to keep idiot investors happy.