The six-year-old student who shot his teacher in the US earlier this year, boasted about the incident saying “I shot [her] dead”, unsealed court documents show.

While being restrained after the shooting at a Virginia school, the boy is said to have admitted “I did it”, adding “I got my mom’s gun last night”.

His teacher, Abigail “Abby” Zwerner - who survived - filed a $40m (£31.4m) lawsuit earlier this year.

The boy has not been charged.

The boy’s mother, however, Deja Taylor, has been charged with felony child neglect and misdemeanour recklessly leaving a loaded firearm as to endanger a child.

In Ms Zwerner’s lawsuit, filed in April, she accuses school officials of gross negligence for ignoring warning signs and argues the defendants knew the child "had a history of random violence

The documents also mention another incident with the same student while he was in kindergarten. A retired teacher told police he started “choking her to the point she could not breathe”.

  • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    2 years ago

    This boy choked someone and shot someone else before turning 7. Maybe a psychiatric hospital should be his home.

  • MonkRome@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s amazing to me how focused these comments are on the child being “evil” and not the environment that created this situation. A child isn’t born believing that shooting their teacher is a viable solution to their problems. At 6 years old you’re barely functional. For this to happen they had to exist in a profoundly fucked up environment with no moral compass and access to a lot of information, presented without good context, far above their age. Everyone responsible for raising this kid should be held responsible.

    This kid needs years of therapy and support and a loving caregiver. Before the age of 10 children are incredibly impressionable and still undergoing very basic core development, until the age of 25 people are still in development to some level. There are many years ahead where this child can be saved from themselves. There is no reason to call a 6 year old irredeemable.

    • BigDawg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 years ago

      It can be both sadly. Some kids are born not right. But will usually be ok with good and professional follow up and loving parents. But there are some kids born without the ability to emphasize with others and that never will get the help they need. And they become terrifying in their teens.

      • IrrationalAndroid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        Empathy is something that is taught. If some kid does not have the ability to have empathy for others, it’s likely because they were neglected/abused during childhood, and were not taught such a thing as empathy.

      • IrrationalAndroid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’d like someone more knowledgeable to confirm this, but I remember that kids cannot be diagnosed certain PDs, so I’m not sure that this can really apply to a child. Also, PDs more often than not derive from childhood problems.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      After the kindergarten incident the child should’ve been given a psychiatric evaluation. It is possible he’s got a “screw loose” but in the vast majority of cases like this you’ll find there’s violence in the home. The foster system sucks ass, but in this case rolling the dice probably would’ve led to a better outcome than leaving him in that home.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    2 years ago

    The intentional shooting itself is all I need to know that the little kid has really significant issues that need to be treated. The fact that he bragged about it isn’t news; he’s six, I’m not expecting him to act maturely about anything.

    • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      My mom works in a school as a therapist for very mentally ill children. There are a few that have been sent to the bad kids school because of violence. I wouldn’t be surprised if she told me one of the kids shot someone.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh look another shooting that basic safe storage laws could have prevented, without even restricting firearm ownership, but ammosexuals still resist them.

    • Falmarri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      How would safe storage laws prevent this? They would just result in another charge for the mother. You really think someone who leaves a gun around with a 6 year old with behavioral issues would lock it up just because of a law?

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Bingo they’re just a barrier to entry that negatively effects those of lower income since safes aren’t cheap. Start a program to provide secure no cost safes upon request and I’m with you.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          This is just poor logic. Guns themselves cost money, which negatively effects those one lower incomes. Should we provide free guns to anyone that wants one too?

          And you know what else negatively effects those on low incomes? Being shot.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Not at all. Guns are often inherited and transferred without fee. And yes in my opinion if you pass a free series of tests on gun ownership/responsibility/safety then yeah, as a militaristic country invasion is almost certainty sooner or later. Should we be militaristic? Probably not but we adjust for the conditions as they are not as we wish them to be.

            Correct, systemic issues including fun fact gun control attempts make lower income areas higher crime and thus higher gun crime. Weird huh?

            • gmtom@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              Correct, systemic issues including fun fact gun control attempts make lower income areas higher crime and thus higher gun crime. Weird huh?

              Are you having a stroke? None of this makes any sort of sense.

        • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Some states require a trigger lock to be sold along with the weapon. Not as good as a safe but it should prevent accidental discharge. That being said I would support a program to provide no-cost lock boxes (not giant safes) for handguns.

      • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Storage laws are the easiest to abide by, though. My stuff all lives in a safe, which key is on my person, because my dotty wife and ditzy daughter frequently forget to lock the door behind them.

        Is an intruder just gonna take the safe and lockboxes? Yep.

        Am I gonna report that theft as “lockbox, contained one pistol (SN:xxxxxxxx); loaded magazine, 9 rounds?” You betcha.

        As you say, LPL videos are free so a lockbox and safe are like, the least obstructive Imlediments ever. What’s the harm in this Pascal’s wager?

        Edit: bah! Wrong reply bug! This was directed to a comment down thread 👇

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        How would safe storage laws prevent this? They would just result in another charge for the mother. You really think someone who leaves a gun around with a 6 year old with behavioral issues would lock it up just because of a law?

        The implication is that you actually enforce the laws after you implement them, rather than just implementing them as a way to add a charge. For example in my country police will come to inspect my house at least once a year to make sure im storing them properly and if a neighbour complains or something they will also make an unschedules checked.

        I get American gun owners would take this basic safety precaution as the deepest violation of a tyranical government and would shoot a cop before they let them inspect their home for safety, but my point is if they did agree to sensible safe storage legislation this wouldnt have happened

    • Armok: God of Blood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      The boy’s mother, however, Deja Taylor, has been charged with felony child neglect and misdemeanour recklessly leaving a loaded firearm as to endanger a child.

      It looks like she violated the storage laws.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, its more like they came up with that as a way to punish someone for this act. As far as im aware, there isnt a law describing how guns need to be sotred to keep them away form kids and if there is, it sure as hell isnt enforced.

        • Armok: God of Blood@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          How do you enforce this other than punishing it when something happens? The police can’t just go into people’s homes to double check that they have their firearms stored safely. People aren’t going to report themselves.

    • 30mag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Would you not consider the following to be a safe storage law?

      https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/18.2-56.2/

      § 18.2-56.2. Allowing access to firearms by children; penalty. A. It shall be unlawful for any person to recklessly leave a loaded, unsecured firearm in such a manner as to endanger the life or limb of any child under the age of fourteen. Any person violating the provisions of this subsection shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.

      B. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to authorize a child under the age of twelve to use a firearm except when the child is under the supervision of an adult. Any person violating this subsection shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. For purposes of this subsection, “adult” shall mean a parent, guardian, person standing in loco parentis to the child or a person twenty-one years or over who has the permission of the parent, guardian, or person standing in loco parentis to supervise the child in the use of a firearm.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Laws don’t force people to use gun safety protocols, but I think the violation of such laws needs to be a felony (no more guns for you).

  • prole@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yo, how strong does a kindergartner need to be to be able to choke out a fully grown adult? Wild.

    • SwallowsDick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Bigger boy (for his age) and a smaller woman, especially a kid using all his strength, it can definitely happen.

    • Aderyna@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      My 5 year old is very big compared to my 5’1" 105 lbs. Honestly I could totally see a kid his size if they were deranged being able to do some serious damage to someone my size.

  • Hank@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Y’all are acting outraged while this boy could’ve stopped the Sandy Hook-shooting. It’s only due to unlucky circumstances that he happened to shoot his teacher instead. Wrong place, wrong time. Poor boy.

  • eckte@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    ‘In kindergarten choking her till she could not breath’ BITCH that’s a 5 year old fuck him up.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I think you woefully underestimate how much it’s drilled into teachers’ heads not to use any sort of physical force at all

      Very, very high chance she loses her job and is potentially charged with assault of she had

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        Loses her job and also can’t get a job anywhere else. It’d essentially be the end of her career

      • eckte@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Idgaf. If a five year old is choking me till the point I can’t breath there will be (appropriate) consequences. He spends 8 hours a day at that school you bet your ass he will behave in my class.

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 years ago

          You can just say you have absolutely zero experience in the classroom, it’s OK.

          • sadreality@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 years ago

            When I was in classroom nobody was ever choking the teacher and if they tried, they would get dropped kicked like a soccer ball.

            • Alto@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 years ago

              Tell that to the teacher from the middle school I went to that got fired for pushing a kid that tried to stab him with a pencil

              • sadreality@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 years ago

                Sounds like a shiti employer, really. Either get a new one or switch career. At this point I don’t get why one would want to be a teacher in the US. Bad pay, zero respect from parents or admins, plus homework as an adult

                Jfc, these people need to be on anti work and work reform to start regaining dignity.

                If society cannot respect the teacher, fuck such shiti society IMHO.

                • eckte@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Why the downvotes? He’s right. Some brainwashed dumbfucks in this thread. Teach your kids manners otherwise other people are very fast fed up with the behavior of your kid.

            • eckte@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Dropkick that little motherfucker. Ciaooo see you again with your parents after school and if your kid doesn’t behave next time he needs to find another school.

        • YeetPics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 years ago

          We know ydgaf, that’s why you keep leaving these braindead comments. The world in your head has little correlation with the one we find ourselves living in.

    • Uranhjort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Hmmm, yes, let us murder this child before he has a chance to murder us. This is what a society does.

      • CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Bruh, I’m just appealing to utilitarianism here. Also, remember that this child almost murdered an innocent teacher.

        • Uranhjort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Approx. 20.000 juveniles were arrested for murder or attempted murder in 2020 (per the US Dept of Justice) Shall we put them all down, as you say? Just to be safe?

          Calling your position utilitarianism is interesting, in what way is really, actually murdering a child (never mind the massive amount of legal, ethical and emotional complications that entail) to prevent a hypothetical future murder maximizing utility for anyone?

          • CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            No, of course we shouldn’t put them all down. But extreme cases like this ought to be considered carefully, and if the risk is high, we should remove these individuals from society.

            To your second point, this child already almost killed someone and then bragged about it, showing no remorse. There is a very good chance he will grow up to try and commit murder again; he’s too far gone. That’s where the utility maximisation comes in.

            And re: your point about there being a great deal of legal, ethical, and emotional complications for this kind of policy intervention, I completely agree. Good thing we’re just talking shit on Lemmy, right? 😂

    • Spez's_Ballz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t agree with this rehabilitation bullshit, it’s only for rich and small countries with already high living standards. Any other country, and it will be just like you said, a bunch of people working their assess off just for a slight chance at a psycho not turning into a disgusting asshole.

      • CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah. I would also say that even in rich and small countries, it’s hard. Some people are just born psychos - far ends of the bell curve, etc etc.

      • Baconheatedradiator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes rehabilitation costs money and time, but do you realise that the death penalty often uses more money and resources than keeping somebody alive and in prison for the remainder of their life?

        It baffles me when people like you jump to these extreme conclusions. Kids a fucked up little shit, but here you are calling for his death. That in itself is extremely fucked up.

    • Blinx615@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Age 6 was the time to intervene but the system is trash, bare minimum assistance provided generally makes things worse.

  • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Great “article” BBC. Let’s vilify the 6 year old who is too young to be any more fucked up than his home environment has directly caused him to be or to otherwise grasp the finality of these actions, with only a brief mention of the mother, and no discussion at all about the easy access to guns which lies at the root of every such story.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wonder if unfettered access to violent media, without parental guidance or context, coupled with a culture of narcissistic whinging about how important guns are for life, with zero structure at home led to this happening.

    • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      As a person who grew up with unrestricted access to violent media, I argue against this point.

      I was watching violent and bloody films like Blade, Kill Bill, From Dusk Till Dawn around the time I was 5. There are a host of violent games avaliable from that time, too.

      I feel like there are two reasons one would seek this type of media out: the aesthetics of violence (there’s a reason John Wick has 4 films) and genuine psychopathy, a craving to emulate.

      I’d argue very few people have an actual craving to emulate extreme violence, even in an environment saturated with its artificial presentation, and that those people would do so without the access to said saturated media. I blame the parents mostly. It’s not the movies that make the attitude for how to treat others, it’s how you’re shown to treat others in real life

      Even as a toddler I understood film was fake

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Kids psychologically profile the same as a psychopath. This is because kids usually haven’t developed their sense of empathy yet.