I figured out how to get my food with NO delivery fee: I get off my fat ass and get it myself. Novel approach, I know.
DoorDash is a hell of a lot cheaper than catching a DUI charge tho
I’m happy that you are physically able, that you have places within walking distance to pick the food up from, or if not that you own a vehicle and are not vision impaired or afflicted with some other ailment that would make driving impossible. I hope you reflect on how fortunate you are.
I do, all the time.
My point was that most people are able to procure their own food without paying exorbitant fees for it; in their case, I consider it lazy and wasteful. That’s also my opinion, and people are free to apply their own judgement.
Me who is physically disabled and can’t leave my house: 👁️👄👁️
It is not that easy for everyone. I for example can’t afford a car. And restaurants aren’t exactly around the corner. So if i want to get food like that, i have to have it delivered.
What about public transport?
5 euros is cheaper for delivery than 15 for a train ticket. Its not that big of a deal honestly. I don’t know the pricing in america but its not to bad where i live. The food itself is becoming way to expensive though.
I only order food a few times a year so its no problem.
It’s significantly different in America. I think doordash has different payment structures in Europe bcos of laws whereas, in most of America, drivers are paid next to nothing. It’s like tipping culture with American service workers, except way worse.
So like, inflated prices (set by the restaurant and optional, but often done to make up for doordash’s cut) + delivery fee (pocketed by doordash of course!) + ridiculous tip bcos now I gotta pay this driver’s livable wage.
Door dash really is an unsustainable business. It’s probably gonna tank in the next 5 years, I’d bet.
USPS should not focus on profitability and fuck Uber and the gig economy.
yes! it is a SERVICE Americans already pay for in taxes, the need to make a profit on it makes no sense.
No we don’t. The USPS is not tax funded, it is self funded by shipping costs and stamp sales.
I have been bamboozled, swore it was
I’d be very fine with it being tax funded instead of being funded by stamps and parcel metering. We might have much less shit mail as a result. It was an actual part of this government, not a corporation like now, before 1970, when the Reorg Act went into effect. Look before 1970 then USPS workers were not allowed to collectively bargain but that still could have been achieved with the a different outcome in 1970.
I would be very fine with tax funding because as a service the work they do facilitates other sectors’ viabilities. There might also be more accountability to help the workers.
This is a perfect illustration of why we should not privatize essential services.
We probably shouldn’t, but this is a terrible example why.
Thankfully food delivery isn’t essential, therefore it should be privatized (preferably by a restaurant that delivers to places hundreds of miles away by plane)
“Essential” is your criteria? To be clear, you’re saying that anything that’s an actual human need, should be state run?
And somehow USPS can still pay their couriers more.
Shhh, Musk might hear you and destroy it.
Don’t worry they already have a plan
One is not designed to generate profit. Nor should it be for that exact reason.
USPS is the most underappreciated thing in the world. In the shittiest areas I’ve ever lived it’s still been fairly reliable. In a nice area, forget about it, perfect.
One of these is a government service and subsidized.
If most of that went to the driver I would be OK with it. I never use those services, they exploit workers
I only do when my daughter is staying somewhere and doesn’t have food to eat. That’s rare, but it has happened a few times.
Government vs private.
It’s the same with healthcare believe it or not.
I don’t care if my mail is still warm when they put it in my mailbox.
Look at that money on the table! Of course we should privatize the USPS!
(/s of course)
Today we are learning about economies of scale, kids!
See the giant bag? He’s got multiple orders in it.
Not as efficient as driving to every mailbox in a row, to be sure.
But it also doesn’t cost Uber probably more than 25% of what they charge for an order, to pay the delivery driver.
A lot of it is about latency too. You’re paying to have someone go get it right now and take it to you right now. Post services pick up stuff daily and get it there over the course of a week or so depending on where exactly it’s going. If you were paying someone to come to you, pick it up, drive it straight to where it’s going, well, it’d be faster, but cost a ton more.
Cooking, the lost art.
You pay 30usd for the food delivery? In the UK it usually is few quid.
Here is a real order from DoorDash recently. The post is exaggerating, but it is definitely a lot once you add all the cost of the fees and tip (spare me snide comments about American tipping culture and just view it as another weird fee we have to pay).
If it’s anything like bolt or uber, they take 30 percent from food price also (which is hidden from the final consumer)
We don’t, unless it’s alot of food. So much food in fact that the equivalent sized package would cost more than $10.50 for USPS to take 3+ days to deliver.
I love USPS but this whole thread makes people look like they’ve been huffing markers all afternoon.
It’s all a racket here. The cost off the food is typically higher than the restaurants menu price, then there’s an upcharged service fee, separate delivery fee, and tip. So, by the time you’re done, you just paid double for that $12-15 item, and Uber eats is the worst of the bunch.
And yet, it won’t keep you from ordering food.
The issue is that there’s still demand for it at that price.
You know that product pitch, “if you sell just one to every person in the world you’ll be a millionaire.” Well, Uber eats is a similar approach, but they can sell a lot of food deliveries until the food arrives cold or it’s the wrong order or the myriad problems food deliveries encounter.
