Mine is orzo. It’s slippery and it should grow a spine and be either pasta or rice but not both.

  • JASN_DE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Conchiglioni/Conchiglie, the ones roughly formed like a mussel. They tend to stick inside each other during cooking.

    Spaghetti are sadly not rough enough for the sauces to stick to them.

    • Upsidedownturtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      💯 Spaghetti, linguine, and similarly shaped pastas are the worst form factor. It holds virtually no sauce, which is the highlight of most pasta dishes. Conversely, spirals, wagon wheels, and texas shaped pastas are great because they have very high sauce:pasta ratios.

    • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Agree. Don’t like smaller rotini either.

      Orzo is great, but I get a brand that makes them significantly larger than Barilla. They’re quite large, much better texture.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Angel hair is probably my most disliked. It just tastes terrible and gets overcooked so easily. I also dislike ditalini but not nearly as much since that usually only goes in like minestrone soup and it might just be that I’m not a fan of minestrone.

    For the best pasta shapes, look no further than Buccatini (the objectively better spaghetti), cellentani (idk it’s just fun), and gemelli (perfect texture for lightly sauced dishes).

    I used to hate farfalle, but I’m okay with that one now. We’ve made our peace. It’s another example of a pasta shape that I only had in one particular dish that I didn’t care for and I formed a negative association as a result.

  • QualifiedKitten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d have to say shells, particularly the “shells & cheese” size. I always have quite a few shells stick together and end up undercooked, and I don’t really encounter that challenge with other shapes.

    I actually like orzo a lot, but I’ve always had it in dishes where it behaves like (and is possibly mixed with) rice. I think it adds a nice (creamy?) balance to some other carby things, such as a veggies. Trader Joe’s sells one that really like that has orzo mixed with spinach, sundried tomatoes, and feta(?) cheese.

  • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hard to say because different pastas are made for different uses, and might not work as well if used for other things.

    But if I had to pick one I’d say Angel hair. It’s just too thin and it makes me uncomfortable.

  • Akesi Seli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m ashamed (as an Italian) to discover only now thanks to this post that “orzo” can be a pasta format and not just another cereal (it also means “barley”). I always heard the term “risoni” for it but “orzo” apparently is used as well. And I agree, it sucks.

    In case you did not know there is a cylindric variant too called “tempestina” which is even more awful (mainly used for soups, or for small children). It’s uncommon to see grown adults eat them but, unfortunately, they exist.

  • Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    As much as I love lasagna, the noodles are the worst part of preparing the dish. They’re awkwardly large and heavy (for a noodle), and God help you if you overcook them even a bit as they will disintegrate under their own weight.

    • CitricBase@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Am I missing something? You don’t have to precook lasagna noodles, you put them straight in the lasagna and they cook in the sauce.

      • Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        depends heavily on the recipe. Due to my “enthusiasm” for pasta in general I prefer to make a much smaller portion, which is very easy to do with a lasagna in a mug, the only real downside is that the noodles need to be pliable first.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Capellini.

    Spaghetti (or even linguini) is the minimum thickness for being able to cook with a soft outer layer to pick up sauce while still keeping some toothiness inside.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Large shells and tubes. It feels like noodles were not meant to be that big, like it’s unnatural. They always look so wet, and then it reminds me that all noodles are wet, but are at a proper size so you can ignore it.

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hah, you made me think of manicotti, which I loved as a kid (cheese tubes!) but can’t even stomach the idea of now.

  • pelya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t think I care about shape, as long as it’s made from durum wheat. Now, we have a lot of pasta here that’s made from regular baking flour, it’s still very common in EE countries, and it’s damn cheap. You must boil it for 40 seconds and not a second more, or it instantly clumps all together and turns into a wallpaper glue.