Didn’t even think of that. You’re right.

I’m actually removing this myself because the rule is no politics

All my homies work at Lawrence Livermore

I imagine you are right

Feel free to repost

Eat my shorts, honky

Well they are in the category of bad MLK statues but yeah I agree oral sex is not very similar to a stern expression

This statue of King was also thought to be an improper depiction.

“We don’t even see his feet. He is embedded in the rock like something not yet fully born, suited and stern, rising from its roughly chiseled surface. His face is uncompromising, determined, his eyes fixed in the distance, not far from where Jefferson stands across the water. But kitsch here strains at the limits of resemblance: Is this the Dr. King of the “I Have a Dream” speech? Or the writer of the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech?”

-Edward Rothstein

Being obtuse for a moment, let me just say: build it right!

That means minimalism! No architecture astronauts! No unnecessary abstraction! No premature optimisation!

Lean on opinionated frameworks so as to focus on coding the business rules!

And for the love of all that is holy, have your developers sit next to the people that will be using the software!

All of this will inherently reduce runaway algorithmic complexity, prevent the sort of artisanal work that causes leakiness, and speed up your code.

Why am I suddenly seeing this guy’s name every single day? Is it a Lemmy thing?

Any even partially publicly funded government code should be open sourced, just like the new rules for public funding and publishing of scientific research. If people actually paid attention this would crush my former local government department.

Oddly yes

Come to Australia then

I knew a guy who worked for TBI. He “loved” busting people for DUI. They need a psychologist to come in and tell them what validity means. Generally, however, DUI people need to have their licence removed permanently.

This is the winning response I think.

deleted by creator