The executives don’t seem interested in quality standards. Maybe the union will.

You used quotes. That’s for repeating what someone said verbatim. And “the legal cause ofnher death” is very different than she was killed by the boyfriend.

Look, it’s bad enough as it is, but you don’t have to lie on the quote. It never said that in the article.

Mmmm, cow AND pig

There’s a standard playbook. Just say the same things as Don or Ron. Talk about woke pineapple slices or something and you’re in. Just commit. Like Chris Rock said, Republicans don’t let “sense” fuck up their argument.

Well, its kill or be killed out there. If you’re the only one alive, they can only hear your side of the story

That’s fine but where’s the line. If someone pulls up in your driveway, is it OK to shoot them? If they knock on your door? What if you have an argument and they throw popcorn at you? The last one was deemed reasonable in Florida. If you have a legitimate conflict with someone, is it just a matter of who kills who first? If someone breaks into your home, this case, he broke the glass and was trying to open the door. Can you shoot them? Do you need to warn them first? What if they were just outside walking around creepily. Is it OK to kill them? Can i provoke someone then when thry come at me, can i kill them? Where’s the line? This is a real question because right now the rules don’t make sense.

I agree with you, I do. It should be legal to protect your property. The problem is when you have a gun, everything looks like a shooting. If you didn’t have a gun, how would you handle the situation? You could leave. You could lock yourself in an interior room and wait for the cops. You could fight them Kevin style. All of those options, at the end of the day, would give you a better chance of not killing somebody.

The constitution isn’t a law. All laws I’ve read describe the punishment for breaking the law. The constitution does not. The government can’t limit speech (within bounds). The government can’t limit guns (within bounds). The government can’t allow insurrectionists to run the government.

This sounds like propaganda to me. I haven’t heard anything like that on the local news.

What’s a vacant house? Is it unowned? Or is it a second house?

Guns are the primary cause. They should go first. The others are secondary causes. They should go next.

So far, nothing has come out on the women. I’m starting to think there’s an inside source. I think it’s Roberts.

Is there a space in your username?