In 20 years after all journalists are fired or leave, The Onion will be the only news outlet left.

There is a precedent for lawlessness. Literally anything is constitutional now, you just do it and ignore the court ruling. Where have you been the last decade?

Upvoted for honesty lol.

Not your fault that the Internet is full of casual misinformation. None of us are immune from that.

American here, trick question, it’s E. Irrelevant, the driver is only paid through tips and the employer doesn’t pay payroll taxes, so his working hours are of no consequence.

If they planned a 1 month migration of a small component, 6 months to complete would be pretty lucky imo. Refactoring Legacy Code mentions the 2.0 approach they’re taking. Spoiler alert, it doesn’t work…

Source? For uh, reasons.

I did. I got banned for “Musk fuming is fatally toxic”. The platform is dead now. I bet he has good dirt on Huffman.

According to the Fox News poll, 100% of all people* approve the Federal censorship of transgender…"

(* People as defined per Executive Order “All Men are Created Equal”, Jan 6 2026).

The irony is that Paxton herself is a dildo.

Best we can do is Saint America.

That is one hell of a way to lose an argument, oof. I thought it was fitting that you were gaslighting a false narrative until the very end. Definite grade school bully vibes. 10/10 would debate again.

Brave search allows misinformation goggles for anyone that believes 2 + 2 = 5.

You win the argument. I concede that 2 plus 2 indeed equals 5. By rejecting any evidence, not actually refuting my points and making up your own logic, your argument is identical to 1+1=3, therefore proving 2+2=5, which is what my first question was. Up is down, you win the argument, and Republicans didn’t cheat. I applaud your bliss and ignorance, sir.

That is pants on fire false. In many cases ballots were rejected for no reason and had to be recast. Democrats and especially Black people were affected disproportionately, why do you think that is only the case in 2024? There is evidence of this being instructed to GOP party leaders as a strategy. And even if true, do you think it’s “fair” to make an all black community stand in line for 3 hours to vote because you removed mail in ballots? Does this not meet the definition of “chest”?

You’ve dodged my actual question 3 times so I win this argument by default. What evidence would it take? You are arguing in bad faith because the answer is none. Look I understand you need to believe you won and your side didn’t cheat despite the evidence. It’s cool, you just go with that.

What evidence would you need to see to convince you? Would any evidence convinced you or do you choose to believe without caring about reality?

One such review of evidence of what I’m saying that contradicts your argument:

https://sdvoice.info/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won-here-are-the-numbers/

Too many logical fallacies in your comment to reply without losing your attention span but I’ll try.

Eligible voters were removed, the link proves it. Quasilegal because it’s a gray area in the law, here’s litigation against the practice but only in some states and inconsistently, hence “quasi”: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/mass-purges-are-new-voter-suppression. Not controversial: a strange lie, of course it’s controversial, most people don’t believe your argument. People didn’t want to vote for Trump in China/India, that is more relevant than your argument as I’ve said before you circled back. No one cheated: false, again.

If that evidence is unconvincing, what evidence would you need to see to convince you? Would any evidence convinced you or do you choose to believe without caring about reality?

There are many reasons for an election win or loss. But the big one we care about in 2024 was widespread purging. It’s quasilegal, there’s evidence of it, it’s cheating, and it suppresses Democrat votes much more.

There were 7 billion people who didn’t immigrate into the US and thus didn’t vote, they were very clear as to why they didn’t come to America. That’s just as relevant as your 90 million, actually more because it’s 100x the people! Don’t get me started on extraterrestrials we didn’t find, there could be trillions. It was clear the reasons we didn’t fund SETI.

“Vandalizing isn’t vandalizing”. You made no argument here.

A strawman, Republicans claimed election fraud (2 + 2 = 5), Democrats claimed voter suppression disproportionately affects them (2 + 2 = 4). What do you think 2 + 2 = ?

You think that violent insurrection against our country by storming the capitol is the same as vandalizing a few cars? How long do you think the sentences should be for each crime? I’d say one is 100x the sentence of the other.

US History: 1774-2025.