Mastodon: @RmDebArc_5@toot.io
This may be a joke and I’m just to dense, but I’m pretty sure there is one
I was talking about written reviews, not just a like/dislike (star) system
Steam is, in my opinion, way better for the user (even if it may be worse for the developer).
Epic lacks features that are important to me like reviews, the ability to view your library in a browser, warnings about DRM, Linux support, a hole bunch of features to discover games, a workshop, big picture mode.
Additionally, in my experience at least, their official launcher under Windows is a buggy mess compared to steam.
You also have to consider air resistance, that should reduce the energy of the bowling ball when hitting you, making it easier to stop
You could always lock the post
I’d like to know if this is just a firmware update or unfixable, but sadly this seems just an ad rather than news
kbin has been discontinued but there is a fork called mbin, piefed and loops are missing and some very small projects, also bridgyfed isn’t there but it’s still a pretty good overview
Yes, and there are already lots of different ones that, at least partially, work together:
Don’t know if there is something LinkedIn like though
AFAIK they bought their only real competition (funimation). Regarding recommendations: I personally find piracy streaming sites have the best recommendations, I mostly use them just for recommendations and don’t even watch there, also you could take a look at !anime@ani.social, specifically the recommendation threads
Yes, but that would require that everywhere else there are bright lights
I think the main problem is they don’t want to maintain multiple accounts
Well, fifty percent of world wars were started by invading Poland, including the most recent one
I believe “the Left” doesn’t really have that much of a problem with copyright, it’s just that the current implementation is absurd regarding length and because of the way stuff like the DMCA and the general society is structured, it is very much rules for thee but not for me with the companies. Copyright (in its current form) mainly protects the revenue of companies while imposing large restrictions on the consumer and by an extent derivative works. However with AI, not only are the models trained and content to which large corporations have control over but also stuff like blogs, copy left code, indie books etc, so this would be one of the cases where copyright could (and should IMO) protect the authors, but realistically this will be a fight entirely between the big players, be it copyright holders or AI companies, that have the funds to fight the legal battles. I think that this has shown a lot of people that, at least in a capitalist society, there should be some form of copyright, but definitely in a reformed way that actually protects creators instead of corporations and doesn’t last indefinitely. Copyright is also very much a problem for left leaning ideology under capitalism ideally there would be no copyright but creators would still get paid, which isn’t really compatible with capitalism.
!unixsocks@lemmy.blahaj.zone crosspost when?
You do you can block posts with the name Trump in then?
Then how about mbin?