This will cover up so many dusty farts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GWXinarYic

Reference: https://youtu.be/8QFPRuzmsBA?t=109

Regular sleep schedule - good

People get to the weekend and think they’ll get away with staying up late and sleeping in.

It’s not worth it.

Per the article, they just developed a faster algorithm for a specific type of material simulation.

You’re underplaying it.

As per the article:

This has broad implications for industries that require detailed material analysis, including:

Aerospace and Defense: Improved modeling of material stress and failure in aircraft structures.

Engineering and Manufacturing: More efficient testing of materials for construction and industrial applications.

Military Research: Faster development of impact-resistant materials for defense systems.

For those (like me) who aren’t familiar with virus genetics, this is called recombination. Yes, it is possible between influenza and bird flu because they are the same virus type.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8439/#A2330

They appear to be clueless, so those with a clue may out themselves.

Guess what day it is today

no bullshit installed

Edge

Pick one

Meanwhile, in the better hemisphere: Why is the sun still up? I’m tryin’ to sleep!

Online dating is essentially a startup pitch. You spend weeks reviewing ‘applications,’ then finally meet for an in-person ‘investor meeting’ to discuss potential ‘synergies.’ If things go well, you can initiate a merger, but if the market shifts—aka they’re not into your favorite TV shows—you’ll quietly dissolve the partnership and move on to the next opportunity.

You’re 41. No one is stopping you from buying and eating gummy snacks.

Don’t let your dreams be dreams.

Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses.

I see economists complaining about variations of this policy being bad, e.g. leading to food desserts.

Sounds delicious. Let us eat cake.

What’s a word for when everyone is laboring, but no one is getting paid?

“Line go up” is the animating force of the age the rich and powerful, the critical philosophical principal around which our entire society their lives is are arranged.

I choose not to confuse their values as mine or that of my community.

You’re using the New York Times to support the idea that the New York Times didn’t support the war.

What do you think could be an issue with using that evidence?

Edit: I find it amusing that the article you shared is partially blocked (censored) unless I sign up to the NYT.

These sources show that the New York Times supported the war because it poorly reported the idea that Iraq had WMDs. The NYT did not do its due dilligence, intentionally mislead the public, or a mix of factors.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/the-new-york-times-wmd-coverage

https://www.smh.com.au/opinion/the-new-york-times-role-in-promoting-war-on-iraq-20040323-gdilbl.html

Just more peanuts. It’s all part of the risk calculations.